» Articles » PMID: 29036714

Accounting for Technical Noise in Differential Expression Analysis of Single-cell RNA Sequencing Data

Overview
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2017 Oct 17
PMID 29036714
Citations 36
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Recent technological breakthroughs have made it possible to measure RNA expression at the single-cell level, thus paving the way for exploring expression heterogeneity among individual cells. Current single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) protocols are complex and introduce technical biases that vary across cells, which can bias downstream analysis without proper adjustment. To account for cell-to-cell technical differences, we propose a statistical framework, TASC (Toolkit for Analysis of Single Cell RNA-seq), an empirical Bayes approach to reliably model the cell-specific dropout rates and amplification bias by use of external RNA spike-ins. TASC incorporates the technical parameters, which reflect cell-to-cell batch effects, into a hierarchical mixture model to estimate the biological variance of a gene and detect differentially expressed genes. More importantly, TASC is able to adjust for covariates to further eliminate confounding that may originate from cell size and cell cycle differences. In simulation and real scRNA-seq data, TASC achieves accurate Type I error control and displays competitive sensitivity and improved robustness to batch effects in differential expression analysis, compared to existing methods. TASC is programmed to be computationally efficient, taking advantage of multi-threaded parallelization. We believe that TASC will provide a robust platform for researchers to leverage the power of scRNA-seq.

Citing Articles

Development of a deep learning-based 1D convolutional neural network model for cross-species natural killer T cell identification using peripheral blood mononuclear cell single-cell RNA sequencing data.

Chokeshaiusaha K, Sananmuang T, Puthier D, Kedkovid R Vet World. 2025; 17(12):2846-2857.

PMID: 39897371 PMC: 11784060. DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2024.2846-2857.


Allogeneic CD33-directed CAR-NKT cells for the treatment of bone marrow-resident myeloid malignancies.

Li Y, Fang Y, Niu S, Zhu Y, Chen Y, Lyu Z Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):1248.

PMID: 39893165 PMC: 11787387. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-56270-6.


Enhancing single-cell transcriptomics using interposed anchor oligonucleotide sequences.

Sun J, Philpott M, Loi D, Hoffman G, Robson J, Mehta N Commun Biol. 2025; 8(1):67.

PMID: 39819888 PMC: 11739374. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-025-07474-5.


scPriorGraph: constructing biosemantic cell-cell graphs with prior gene set selection for cell type identification from scRNA-seq data.

Cao X, Huang Y, You Z, Shang X, Hu L, Hu P Genome Biol. 2024; 25(1):207.

PMID: 39103856 PMC: 11302842. DOI: 10.1186/s13059-024-03357-w.


Single-cell omics: experimental workflow, data analyses and applications.

Sun F, Li H, Sun D, Fu S, Gu L, Shao X Sci China Life Sci. 2024; 68(1):5-102.

PMID: 39060615 DOI: 10.1007/s11427-023-2561-0.


References
1.
Qiu X, Hill A, Packer J, Lin D, Ma Y, Trapnell C . Single-cell mRNA quantification and differential analysis with Census. Nat Methods. 2017; 14(3):309-315. PMC: 5330805. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.4150. View

2.
Finak G, McDavid A, Yajima M, Deng J, Gersuk V, Shalek A . MAST: a flexible statistical framework for assessing transcriptional changes and characterizing heterogeneity in single-cell RNA sequencing data. Genome Biol. 2015; 16:278. PMC: 4676162. DOI: 10.1186/s13059-015-0844-5. View

3.
Stegle O, Teichmann S, Marioni J . Computational and analytical challenges in single-cell transcriptomics. Nat Rev Genet. 2015; 16(3):133-45. DOI: 10.1038/nrg3833. View

4.
Sandberg R . Entering the era of single-cell transcriptomics in biology and medicine. Nat Methods. 2014; 11(1):22-4. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.2764. View

5.
Tung P, Blischak J, Hsiao C, Knowles D, Burnett J, Pritchard J . Batch effects and the effective design of single-cell gene expression studies. Sci Rep. 2017; 7:39921. PMC: 5206706. DOI: 10.1038/srep39921. View