» Articles » PMID: 29018216

Structural and Mechanistic Characterization of an Archaeal-like Chaperonin from a Thermophilic Bacterium

Overview
Journal Nat Commun
Specialty Biology
Date 2017 Oct 12
PMID 29018216
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The chaperonins (CPNs) are megadalton sized hollow complexes with two cavities that open and close to encapsulate non-native proteins. CPNs are assigned to two sequence-related groups that have distinct allosteric mechanisms. In Group I CPNs a detachable co-chaperone, GroES, closes the chambers whereas in Group II a built-in lid closes the chambers. Group I CPNs have a bacterial ancestry, whereas Group II CPNs are archaeal in origin. Here we describe open and closed crystal structures representing a new phylogenetic branch of CPNs. These Group III CPNs are divergent in sequence and structure from extant CPNs, but are closed by a built-in lid like Group II CPNs. A nucleotide-sensing loop, present in both Group I and Group II CPNs, is notably absent. We identified inter-ring pivot joints that articulate during ring closure. These Group III CPNs likely represent a relic from the ancestral CPN that formed distinct bacterial and archaeal branches.Chaperonins (CPNs) are ATP-dependent protein-folding machines. Here the authors present the open and closed crystal structures of a Group III CPN from the thermophilic bacterium Carboxydothermus hydrogenoformans, discuss its mechanism and structurally compare it with Group I and II CPNs.

Citing Articles

Heat shock proteins with an emphasis on HSP 60.

Malik J, Lone R Mol Biol Rep. 2021; 48(10):6959-6969.

PMID: 34498161 DOI: 10.1007/s11033-021-06676-4.


Structural analysis of the Sulfolobus solfataricus TF55β chaperonin by cryo-electron microscopy.

Zeng Y, Sobti M, Stewart A Acta Crystallogr F Struct Biol Commun. 2021; 77(Pt 3):79-84.

PMID: 33682792 PMC: 7938637. DOI: 10.1107/S2053230X21002223.


Complex Destabilization in the Mitochondrial Chaperonin Hsp60 Leads to Disease.

Rodriguez A, Von Salzen D, Holguin B, Bernal R Front Mol Biosci. 2020; 7:159.

PMID: 32766281 PMC: 7381220. DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2020.00159.


Bridging human chaperonopathies and microbial chaperonins.

de Macario E, Yohda M, Macario A, Robb F Commun Biol. 2019; 2:103.

PMID: 30911678 PMC: 6420498. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-019-0318-5.


Single-Ring Intermediates Are Essential for Some Chaperonins.

Bhatt J, Enriquez A, Wang J, Rojo H, Molugu S, Hildenbrand Z Front Mol Biosci. 2018; 5:42.

PMID: 29755985 PMC: 5934643. DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2018.00042.


References
1.
Albanese V, Yam A, Baughman J, Parnot C, Frydman J . Systems analyses reveal two chaperone networks with distinct functions in eukaryotic cells. Cell. 2006; 124(1):75-88. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.11.039. View

2.
Reissmann S, Parnot C, Booth C, Chiu W, Frydman J . Essential function of the built-in lid in the allosteric regulation of eukaryotic and archaeal chaperonins. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2007; 14(5):432-40. PMC: 3339572. DOI: 10.1038/nsmb1236. View

3.
Laksanalamai P, Whitehead T, Robb F . Minimal protein-folding systems in hyperthermophilic archaea. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004; 2(4):315-24. DOI: 10.1038/nrmicro866. View

4.
Hirtreiter A, Calloni G, Forner F, Scheibe B, Puype M, Vandekerckhove J . Differential substrate specificity of group I and group II chaperonins in the archaeon Methanosarcina mazei. Mol Microbiol. 2009; 74(5):1152-68. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06924.x. View

5.
Saibil H . Chaperone machines in action. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2008; 18(1):35-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2007.11.006. View