» Articles » PMID: 29018195

Prior Preferences Beneficially Influence Social and Non-social Learning

Overview
Journal Nat Commun
Specialty Biology
Date 2017 Oct 12
PMID 29018195
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Our personal preferences affect a broad array of social behaviors. This includes the way we learn the preferences of others, an ability that often relies on limited or ambiguous information. Here we report an egocentric influence on this type of social learning that is reflected in both performance and response times. Using computational models that combine inter-trial learning and intra-trial choice, we find transient effects of participants' preferences on the learning process, through the influence of priors, and persistent effects on the choice process. A second experiment shows that these effects generalize to non-social learning, though participants in the social learning experiment appeared to additionally benefit by using their knowledge about the popularity of certain preferences. We further find that the domain-general egocentric influences we identify can yield performance advantages in uncertain environments.People often assume that other people share their preferences, but how exactly this bias manifests itself in learning and decision-making is unclear. Here, authors show that a person's own preferences influence learning in both social and non-social situations, and that this bias improves performance.

Citing Articles

D2/D3 dopamine supports the precision of mental state inferences and self-relevance of joint social outcomes.

Barnby J, Bell V, Deeley Q, Mehta M, Moutoussis M Nat Ment Health. 2024; 2(5):562-573.

PMID: 38746690 PMC: 11088992. DOI: 10.1038/s44220-024-00220-6.


Time-specific convergence and divergence in individual differences in behavior: Theory, protocols and analyzes.

Stamps J, Biro P Ecol Evol. 2023; 13(11):e10615.

PMID: 38034332 PMC: 10682899. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.10615.


A Common Neural Account for Social and Nonsocial Decisions.

Arabadzhiyska D, Garrod O, Fouragnan E, Luca E, Schyns P, Philiastides M J Neurosci. 2022; 42(48):9030-9044.

PMID: 36280264 PMC: 9732824. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0375-22.2022.


Neural substrates of motivational dysfunction across neuropsychiatric conditions: Evidence from meta-analysis and lesion network mapping.

Feng C, Huang W, Xu K, Stewart J, Camilleri J, Yang X Clin Psychol Rev. 2022; 96:102189.

PMID: 35908312 PMC: 9720091. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2022.102189.


Dopaminergic challenge dissociates learning from primary versus secondary sources of information.

Rybicki A, Sowden S, Schuster B, Cook J Elife. 2022; 11.

PMID: 35289748 PMC: 9023054. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.74893.


References
1.
Ratcliff R, McKoon G . The diffusion decision model: theory and data for two-choice decision tasks. Neural Comput. 2007; 20(4):873-922. PMC: 2474742. DOI: 10.1162/neco.2008.12-06-420. View

2.
Janowski V, Camerer C, Rangel A . Empathic choice involves vmPFC value signals that are modulated by social processing implemented in IPL. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2012; 8(2):201-8. PMC: 3575723. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsr086. View

3.
Williams D, Williams H . Auto-maintenance in the pigeon: sustained pecking despite contingent non-reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969; 12(4):511-20. PMC: 1338642. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-511. View

4.
Behrens T, Hunt L, Woolrich M, Rushworth M . Associative learning of social value. Nature. 2008; 456(7219):245-9. PMC: 2605577. DOI: 10.1038/nature07538. View

5.
Robbins J, Krueger J . Social projection to ingroups and outgroups: a review and meta-analysis. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2005; 9(1):32-47. DOI: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0901_3. View