» Articles » PMID: 30173633

The Application of Computational Models to Social Neuroscience: Promises and Pitfalls

Overview
Journal Soc Neurosci
Publisher Routledge
Date 2018 Sep 4
PMID 30173633
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Interactions with conspecifics are key to any social species. In order to navigate this social world, it is crucial for individuals to learn from and about others. From learning new skills by observing parents perform them to making complex collective decisions, understanding the mechanisms underlying social cognitive processes has been of considerable interest to psychologists and neuroscientists. Here, we review studies that have used computational modelling techniques, combined with neuroimaging, to shed light on how people learn and make decisions in social contexts. As opposed to standard social neuroscience methods, the computational approach allows one to directly examine where in the brain particular computations, as estimated by models of behavior, are implemented. Findings suggest that people use several strategies to learn from others: vicarious reward learning, where one learns from observing the reward outcomes of another agent; action imitation, which relies on encoding a prediction error between the expected and actual actions of the other agent; and social inference, where one learns by inferring the goals and intentions of others. These computations are implemented in distinct neural networks, which may be recruited adaptively depending on task demands, the environment and other social factors.

Citing Articles

FrAMBI: A Software Framework for Auditory Modeling Based on Bayesian Inference.

Barumerli R, Majdak P Neuroinformatics. 2025; 23(2):20.

PMID: 39928214 DOI: 10.1007/s12021-024-09702-5.


Social conformity is a heuristic when individual risky decision-making is disrupted.

Orloff M, Chung D, Gu X, Wang X, Gao Z, Song G PLoS Comput Biol. 2024; 20(12):e1012602.

PMID: 39621793 PMC: 11651703. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012602.


Humans can infer social preferences from decision speed alone.

Bavard S, Stuchly E, Konovalov A, Gluth S PLoS Biol. 2024; 22(6):e3002686.

PMID: 38900903 PMC: 11189591. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002686.


Heterogeneity in strategy use during arbitration between experiential and observational learning.

Charpentier C, Wu Q, Min S, Ding W, Cockburn J, ODoherty J Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):4436.

PMID: 38789415 PMC: 11126711. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-48548-y.


The social transmission of empathy relies on observational reinforcement learning.

Zhou Y, Han S, Kang P, Tobler P, Hein G Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(9):e2313073121.

PMID: 38381794 PMC: 10907261. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2313073121.


References
1.
Mahmoodi A, Bang D, Olsen K, Zhao Y, Shi Z, Broberg K . Equality bias impairs collective decision-making across cultures. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015; 112(12):3835-40. PMC: 4378431. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1421692112. View

2.
ODoherty J, Hampton A, Kim H . Model-based fMRI and its application to reward learning and decision making. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007; 1104:35-53. DOI: 10.1196/annals.1390.022. View

3.
Jones R, Somerville L, Li J, Ruberry E, Libby V, Glover G . Behavioral and neural properties of social reinforcement learning. J Neurosci. 2011; 31(37):13039-45. PMC: 3303166. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2972-11.2011. View

4.
Ereira S, Dolan R, Kurth-Nelson Z . Agent-specific learning signals for self-other distinction during mentalising. PLoS Biol. 2018; 16(4):e2004752. PMC: 5915684. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2004752. View

5.
Whiten A, McGuigan N, Marshall-Pescini S, Hopper L . Emulation, imitation, over-imitation and the scope of culture for child and chimpanzee. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009; 364(1528):2417-28. PMC: 2865074. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0069. View