» Articles » PMID: 29016784

Sex Differences in Outcomes of Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillator Therapy: Combined Registry Data from Eleven European Countries

Abstract

Aims: Therapy with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is established for the prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in high risk patients. We aimed to determine the effectiveness of primary prevention ICD therapy by analysing registry data from 14 centres in 11 European countries compiled between 2002 and 2014, with emphasis on outcomes in women who have been underrepresented in all trials.

Methods And Results: Retrospective data of 14 local registries of primary prevention ICD implantations between 2002 and 2014 were compiled in a central database. Predefined primary outcome measures were overall mortality and first appropriate and first inappropriate shocks. A multivariable model enforcing a common hazard ratio for sex category across the centres, but allowing for centre-specific baseline hazards and centre specific effects of other covariates, was adjusted for age, the presence of ischaemic cardiomyopathy or a CRT-D, and left ventricular ejection fraction ≤25%. Of the 5033 patients, 957 (19%) were women. During a median follow-up of 33 months (IQR 16-55 months) 129 women (13%) and 807 men (20%) died (HR 0.65; 95% CI: [0.53, 0.79], P-value < 0.0001). An appropriate ICD shock occurred in 66 women (8%) and 514 men (14%; HR 0.61; 95% CI: 0.47-0.79; P = 0.0002).

Conclusion: Our retrospective analysis of 14 local registries in 11 European countries demonstrates that fewer women than men undergo ICD implantation for primary prevention. After multivariate adjustment, women have a significantly lower mortality and receive fewer appropriate ICD shocks.

Citing Articles

Sex and Gender Differences in Ventricular Arrhythmias.

Warnock R, Modi R, Westerman S US Cardiol. 2024; 17:e12.

PMID: 39559519 PMC: 11571389. DOI: 10.15420/usc.2022.38.


Sex differences among subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator recipients: a propensity-matched, multicentre, international analysis from the i-SUSI project.

Schiavone M, Gasperetti A, Vogler J, Compagnucci P, Laredo M, Breitenstein A Europace. 2024; 26(5).

PMID: 38696701 PMC: 11100525. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euae115.


Underrepresentation of women in implantable cardioverter defibrillator trials.

Han J, Russo A Am Heart J Plus. 2024; 14:100120.

PMID: 38560561 PMC: 10978341. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2022.100120.


Sex-related similarities and differences in responses to heart failure therapies.

Chyou J, Qin H, Butler J, Voors A, Lam C Nat Rev Cardiol. 2024; 21(7):498-516.

PMID: 38459252 DOI: 10.1038/s41569-024-00996-1.


Gender Effect on Clinical Profiles, Pharmacological Treatments and Prognosis in Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure.

Fazzini L, Casati M, Martis A, Perra F, Rubiolo P, Deidda M J Clin Med. 2024; 13(3).

PMID: 38337574 PMC: 10856570. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13030881.


References
1.
Moss A, Schuger C, Beck C, Brown M, Cannom D, Daubert J . Reduction in inappropriate therapy and mortality through ICD programming. N Engl J Med. 2012; 367(24):2275-83. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1211107. View

2.
Seegers J, Conen D, Jung K, Bergau L, Dorenkamp M, Luthje L . Sex difference in appropriate shocks but not mortality during long-term follow-up in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Europace. 2015; 18(8):1194-202. PMC: 4974631. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euv361. View

3.
Rover C, Knapp G, Friede T . Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman approach and its modification for random-effects meta-analysis with few studies. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015; 15:99. PMC: 4647507. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-015-0091-1. View

4.
Kadish A . Prophylactic defibrillator implantation--toward an evidence-based approach. N Engl J Med. 2005; 352(3):285-7. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMe048351. View

5.
Conen D, Arendacka B, Rover C, Bergau L, Munoz P, Wijers S . Gender Differences in Appropriate Shocks and Mortality among Patients with Primary Prophylactic Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS One. 2016; 11(9):e0162756. PMC: 5019464. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162756. View