» Articles » PMID: 28987557

Stapled Anastomosis Versus Hand-sewn Anastomosis of Gastro/duodenojejunostomy in Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal Int J Surg
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2017 Oct 9
PMID 28987557
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Controversy exists regarding the best anastomotic method for pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). We aimed to evaluate the perioperative outcomes of PD with stapled anastomosis (SA) versus hand-sewn anastomosis (HA) of gastrojejunostomy or duodenojejunostomy.

Methods: We conducted a systematic search of electronic information sources, including MEDLINE; EMBASE; CINAHL; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry; ClinicalTrials.gov; ISRCTN Register, and bibliographic reference lists. We applied a combination of free text and controlled vocabulary search adapted to thesaurus headings, search operators and limits in each of the above databases. Delayed gastric emptying (DGE), postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), anastomotic bleeding, anastomotic leak, intra-abdominal abscess and mortality were defined as the outcome parameters. Combined overall effect sizes were calculated using fixed-effect or random-effects models.

Results: We identified 1 randomised controlled trial (RCT) and 5 observational studies reporting a total of 890 patients who underwent PD with SA (n = 300) or conventional HA (n = 590). Our analysis demonstrated that SA significantly reduced postoperative DGE (OR: 0.37, 95% CI 0.25-0.54, P < 0.00001) but significantly increased anastomotic bleeding (OR: 13.4, 95% CI 2.96-57.41, P = 0.0007) compared to HA. No significant difference was found in POPF (OR: 0.83, 95% CI 0.56-1.21, P = 0.33); anastomotic leak (OR: 0.50, 95% CI 0.09-3.79, P = 0.58); intra-abdominal abscess (OR: 1.39, 95% CI 0.71-2.70, P = 0.34); or mortality (RD: -0.01, 95% CI 0.03-0.02, P = 0.65) between two groups.

Conclusions: Our analysis demonstrated that compared to conventional HA, SA may be associated with lower incidence of DGE after PD without increasing the risk of clinically significant POPF, anastomotic leak or mortality. However, it is associated with higher rate of anastomotic bleeding which mandates careful and precise haemostasis of the stapled line. Considering the current limited evidence, no definitive conclusion can be drawn. Future research is required.

Citing Articles

Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting clinically relevant delayed gastric emptying in patients undergoing total pancreatectomy.

Li T, Lin C, Zhao B, Li Z, Zhao Y, Han X BMC Surg. 2024; 24(1):283.

PMID: 39363181 PMC: 11448429. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-024-02575-0.


Endoscopic clipping of gastrojejunostomy leakage following Whipple procedure: A case report.

Muhammedoglu B, Ay O World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024; 16(9):3041-3047.

PMID: 39351554 PMC: 11438800. DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i9.3041.


Delayed gastric emptying after pancreatoduodenectomy: an analysis of risk factors.

Sabogal J, Monroy D, Rey Chaves C, Ayala D, Gonzalez J Updates Surg. 2024; 76(4):1247-1255.

PMID: 38598061 PMC: 11341576. DOI: 10.1007/s13304-024-01795-6.


Endoscopic Management of Bleeding in Altered Anatomy after Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery.

Gibiino G, Binda C, Secco M, Giuffrida P, Coluccio C, Perini B Medicina (Kaunas). 2023; 59(11).

PMID: 38003990 PMC: 10672978. DOI: 10.3390/medicina59111941.


Surgical Techniques of Gastrojejunostomy in Robotic Pancreatoduodenectomy: Robot-Sewn versus Stapled Gastrojejunostomy Anastomosis.

Takagi K, Umeda Y, Yoshida R, Fuji T, Yasui K, Kimura J J Clin Med. 2023; 12(2).

PMID: 36675661 PMC: 9863298. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12020732.