» Articles » PMID: 28973564

Linking Crowding, Visual Span, and Reading

Overview
Journal J Vis
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2017 Oct 4
PMID 28973564
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The visual span is hypothesized to be a sensory bottleneck on reading speed with crowding thought to be the major sensory factor limiting the size of the visual span. This proposed linkage between crowding, visual span, and reading speed is challenged by the finding that training to read crowded letters reduced crowding but did not improve reading speed (Chung, 2007). Here, we examined two properties of letter-recognition training that may influence the transfer to improved reading: the spatial arrangement of training stimuli and the presence of flankers. Three groups of nine young adults were trained with different configurations of letter stimuli at 10° in the lower visual field: a flanked-local group (flanked letters localized at one position), a flanked-distributed group (flanked letters distributed across different horizontal locations), and an isolated-distributed group (isolated and distributed letters). We found that distributed training, but not the presence of flankers, appears to be necessary for the training benefit to transfer to increased reading speed. Localized training may have biased attention to one specific, small area in the visual field, thereby failing to improve reading. We conclude that the visual span represents a sensory bottleneck on reading, but there may also be an attentional bottleneck. Reducing the impact of crowding can enlarge the visual span and can potentially facilitate reading, but not when adverse attentional bias is present. Our results clarify the association between crowding, visual span, and reading.

Citing Articles

Investigating the crowding effect on letters and symbols in deaf adults.

Kamble V, Buyle M, Crollen V Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):16161.

PMID: 38997432 PMC: 11245469. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-66832-1.


Customizing spatial remapping of letters to aid reading in the presence of a simulated central field loss.

Flowers C, Legge G, Engel S J Vis. 2024; 24(4):17.

PMID: 38635281 PMC: 11033602. DOI: 10.1167/jov.24.4.17.


Enhancing the Functional Performance of Patients with Late-Stage Age-Related Macular Degeneration Implanted with a Miniature Telescope using Rehabilitation Training.

Sasso P, Savastano A, Vidal-Aroca F, Minnella A, Francione G, Sammarco L Ophthalmol Ther. 2024; 13(3):697-707.

PMID: 38165600 PMC: 10853143. DOI: 10.1007/s40123-023-00871-1.


Abnormal basic visual processing functions in binocular fusion disorders.

Benhaim-Sitbon L, Lev M, Polat U Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):19301.

PMID: 37935803 PMC: 10630403. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-46291-w.


Consistency of preferred retinal locus across tasks and participants trained with a simulated scotoma.

Maniglia M, Visscher K, Seitz A Vision Res. 2022; 203:108158.

PMID: 36527839 PMC: 9914520. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2022.108158.


References
1.
Martelli M, Di Filippo G, Spinelli D, Zoccolotti P . Crowding, reading, and developmental dyslexia. J Vis. 2009; 9(4):14.1-18. DOI: 10.1167/9.4.14. View

2.
Chung S . The effect of letter spacing on reading speed in central and peripheral vision. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002; 43(4):1270-6. View

3.
Lee H, Kwon M, Legge G, Gefroh J . Training improves reading speed in peripheral vision: is it due to attention?. J Vis. 2010; 10(6):18. PMC: 2951270. DOI: 10.1167/10.6.18. View

4.
Doron A, Manassi M, Herzog M, Ahissar M . Intact crowding and temporal masking in dyslexia. J Vis. 2015; 15(14):13. DOI: 10.1167/15.14.13. View

5.
Legge G, Cheung S, Yu D, Chung S, Lee H, Owens D . The case for the visual span as a sensory bottleneck in reading. J Vis. 2008; 7(2):9.1-15. PMC: 2729064. DOI: 10.1167/7.2.9. View