Letter-recognition and Reading Speed in Peripheral Vision Benefit from Perceptual Learning

Overview

Journal Vision Res

Specialty Ophthalmology

Date 2004 Jan 31

PMID 14751554

Citations 62

Authors

Susana T L Chung

Gordon E Legge

Sing-Hang Cheung

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Visual-span profiles are plots of letter-recognition accuracy as a function of letter position left or right of the midline. Previously, we have shown that contraction of these profiles in peripheral vision can account for slow reading speed in peripheral vision. In this study, we asked two questions: (1) can we modify visual-span profiles through training on letter-recognition, and if so, (2) are these changes accompanied by changes in reading speed? Eighteen normally sighted observers were randomly assigned to one of three groups: training at 10 degrees in the upper visual field, training at 10 degrees in the lower visual field and a no-training control group. We compared observers' characteristics of reading (maximum reading speed and critical print size) and visual-span profiles (peak amplitude and bits of information transmitted) before and after training, and at trained and untrained retinal locations (10 degrees upper and lower visual fields). Reading speeds were measured for six print sizes at each retinal location, using the rapid serial visual presentation paradigm. Visual-span profiles were measured using a trigram letter-recognition task, for a letter size equivalent to 1.4x the critical print size for reading. Training consisted of the repeated measurement of 20 visual-span profiles (over four consecutive days) in either the upper or lower visual field. We also tracked the changes in performance in a sub-group of observers for up to three months following training. We found that the visual-span profiles can be expanded (bits of information transmitted increased by 6 bits) through training with a letter-recognition task, and that there is an accompanying increase (41%) in the maximum reading speed. These improvements transferred, to a large extent, from the trained to an untrained retinal location, and were retained, to a large extent, for at least three months following training. Our results are consistent with the view that the visual span is a bottleneck on reading speed, but a bottleneck that can be increased with practice.

Citing Articles

Is the Normal Periphery in Young Adults a Good Model for Reading in the Presence of Central Vision Loss?.

Chung S, Legge G Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2025; 66(2):62.

PMID: 39992670 PMC: 11878245. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.66.2.62.

The temporal dynamics of visual crowding in letter recognition: Modulating crowding with alternating flicker presentations.

Silva A, Lehmann R, Perikleous N, Thompson B J Vis. 2023; 23(10):18.

PMID: 37768277 PMC: 10540873. DOI: 10.1167/jov.23.10.18.

A gaze-contingent saccadic re-referencing training with simulated central vision loss.

Ganesan S, Melnik N, Azanon E, Pollmann S J Vis. 2023; 23(1):13.

PMID: 36662502 PMC: 9872842. DOI: 10.1167/jov.23.1.13.

Training peripheral vision to read: Using stimulus exposure and identity priming.

Yu D Front Neurosci. 2022; 16:916447.

PMID: 36090292 PMC: 9451508. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.916447.

Reading text works better than watching videos to improve acuity in a simulation of artificial vision.

Rassia K, Moutoussis K, Pezaris J Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):12953.

PMID: 35902596 PMC: 9334451. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-10719-6.

References

Legge G, Klitz T, Tjan B . Mr. Chips: an ideal-observer model of reading. Psychol Rev. 1997; 104(3):524-53. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.104.3.524. View

Ball K, Sekuler R . A specific and enduring improvement in visual motion discrimination. Science. 1982; 218(4573):697-8. DOI: 10.1126/science.7134968. View

Ball K, Sekuler R . Direction-specific improvement in motion discrimination. Vision Res. 1987; 27(6):953-65. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(87)90011-3. View

Kleen S, Levoy R . Low vision care: correlation of patient age, visual goals, and aids prescribed. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1981; 58(3):200-5. View

Mansfield J, Legge G, Bane M . Psychophysics of reading. XV: Font effects in normal and low vision. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996; 37(8):1492-501. View

Ellison A, Walsh V . Visual field asymmetries in attention and learning. Spat Vis. 2001; 14(1):3-9. DOI: 10.1163/156856801741323. View

Poggio T, Fahle M, Edelman S . Fast perceptual learning in visual hyperacuity. Science. 1992; 256(5059):1018-21. DOI: 10.1126/science.1589770. View

He S, Cavanagh P, Intriligator J . Attentional resolution and the locus of visual awareness. Nature. 1996; 383(6598):334-7. DOI: 10.1038/383334a0. View

Chung S . The effect of letter spacing on reading speed in central and peripheral vision. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002; 43(4):1270-6. View

10.

Chung S, Mansfield J, Legge G . Psychophysics of reading. XVIII. The effect of print size on reading speed in normal peripheral vision. Vision Res. 1998; 38(19):2949-62. DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(98)00072-8. View

11.

WERTHEIM T . Peripheral visual acuity: Th. Wertheim. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1980; 57(12):915-24. View

12.

Westheimer G . Is peripheral visual acuity susceptible to perceptual learning in the adult?. Vision Res. 2001; 41(1):47-52. DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(00)00245-5. View

13.

Karni A, Sagi D . Where practice makes perfect in texture discrimination: evidence for primary visual cortex plasticity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991; 88(11):4966-70. PMC: 51788. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.88.11.4966. View

14.

Elliott D, Strong J, Pace R, Plotkin A, Bevers P . Demographic characteristics of the vision-disabled elderly. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997; 38(12):2566-75. View

15.

Legge G, Mansfield J, Chung S . Psychophysics of reading. XX. Linking letter recognition to reading speed in central and peripheral vision. Vision Res. 2001; 41(6):725-43. DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(00)00295-9. View

16.

Ball K, Beard B, Roenker D, Miller R, Griggs D . Age and visual search: expanding the useful field of view. J Opt Soc Am A. 1988; 5(12):2210-9. DOI: 10.1364/josaa.5.002210. View

17.

Fahle M, Edelman S . Long-term learning in vernier acuity: effects of stimulus orientation, range and of feedback. Vision Res. 1993; 33(3):397-412. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(93)90094-d. View

18.

Sommerhalder J, Oueghlani E, Bagnoud M, Leonards U, Safran A, Pelizzone M . Simulation of artificial vision: I. Eccentric reading of isolated words, and perceptual learning. Vision Res. 2003; 43(3):269-83. DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(02)00481-9. View

19.

Nilsson U, Frennesson C, Nilsson S . Location and stability of a newly established eccentric retinal locus suitable for reading, achieved through training of patients with a dense central scotoma. Optom Vis Sci. 1999; 75(12):873-8. DOI: 10.1097/00006324-199812000-00009. View

20.

Rubin G, Turano K . Low vision reading with sequential word presentation. Vision Res. 1994; 34(13):1723-33. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(94)90129-5. View