Comparison of the Toxicity Profile of PD-1 Versus PD-L1 Inhibitors in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Analysis of the Literature
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: Monoclonal antibodies against programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) are effective therapies in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Herein, the authors performed a systematic review investigating differences in the toxicities of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors.
Methods: An electronic literature search was performed of public databases (MEDLINE, Excerpta Medica dataBASE [EMBASE], and Cochrane) and conference proceedings for trials using PD-1 inhibitors (nivolumab and pembrolizumab) and PD-L1 inhibitors (atezolizumab, durvalumab, and avelumab) in patients with NSCLC. A formal systematic analysis was conducted with Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software (version 2.2). Clinical and demographic characteristics, response, and toxicity data were compared between both groups.
Results: A total of 23 studies reported between 2013 and 2016 were eligible for analysis. The total number of patients evaluated for toxicities was 3284 patients in the PD-1 group and 2460 patients in the PD-L1 group. The baseline patient characteristics of the 2 groups were similar, although there was a trend toward increased squamous histology in the group treated with PD-L1 (32% vs 25%; P = .6). There was no difference in response rate noted between PD-1 (19%) and PD-L1 (18.6%) inhibitors (P = .17). The incidence of overall adverse events (AEs) was comparable between the PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors (64% [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 63%-66%] vs 66% [95% CI, 65%-69%]; P = .8). Fatigue was the most frequently reported AE with both classes of drugs. Patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors were found to have a slightly increased rate of immune-related AEs (16% [95% CI, 14%-17%] vs 11% [95% CI, 10%-13%]; P = .07) and pneumonitis (4% [95% CI, 3%-5%] vs 2% [95% CI, 1%-3%]; P = .01) compared with patients who received PD-L1 inhibitors.
Conclusions: In this systematic review involving 5744 patients with NSCLC, the toxicity and efficacy profiles of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors appear to be similar. Cancer 2018;124:271-7. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
Boucheron T, Chiche L, Penaranda G, Souquet M, Pegliasco H, Deturmeny J Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2025; 21:273-282.
PMID: 40060169 PMC: 11890422. DOI: 10.2147/TCRM.S479686.
Zhang X, Wang J, Wang G, Zhang Y, Fan Q, Lu C JAMA. 2025; .
PMID: 39992668 PMC: 11851304. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2024.28463.
Zhang H, Huang J, Xu H, Yin N, Zhou L, Xue J Front Immunol. 2025; 16:1523455.
PMID: 39931055 PMC: 11808008. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1523455.
Gockeln L, Wirsdorfer F, Jendrossek V Front Cell Dev Biol. 2025; 12:1471072.
PMID: 39872847 PMC: 11769960. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2024.1471072.
A Real-World Comparison of the Safety Profile for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Oncology Patients.
Alwhaibi A, Alenazi M, Alghadeer S, Mansy W, Alsaif R, Abualreesh N J Clin Med. 2025; 14(2).
PMID: 39860394 PMC: 11765622. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14020388.