» Articles » PMID: 28957654

Folding Membrane Proteins by Deep Transfer Learning

Overview
Journal Cell Syst
Publisher Cell Press
Date 2017 Sep 29
PMID 28957654
Citations 31
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Computational elucidation of membrane protein (MP) structures is challenging partially due to lack of sufficient solved structures for homology modeling. Here, we describe a high-throughput deep transfer learning method that first predicts MP contacts by learning from non-MPs and then predicts 3D structure models using the predicted contacts as distance restraints. Tested on 510 non-redundant MPs, our method has contact prediction accuracy at least 0.18 better than existing methods, predicts correct folds for 218 MPs, and generates 3D models with root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) less than 4 and 5 Å for 57 and 108 MPs, respectively. A rigorous blind test in the continuous automated model evaluation project shows that our method predicted high-resolution 3D models for two recent test MPs of 210 residues with RMSD ∼2 Å. We estimated that our method could predict correct folds for 1,345-1,871 reviewed human multi-pass MPs including a few hundred new folds, which shall facilitate the discovery of drugs targeting at MPs.

Citing Articles

From cell lines to cancer patients: personalized drug synergy prediction.

Kuru H, Cicek A, Tastan O Bioinformatics. 2024; 40(5).

PMID: 38718189 PMC: 11215552. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btae134.


Distinct structural motifs are necessary for targeting and import of Tim17 in mitochondrion.

Darden C, Donkor J, Korolkova O, Barozai M, Chaudhuri M mSphere. 2024; 9(1):e0055823.

PMID: 38193679 PMC: 10871166. DOI: 10.1128/msphere.00558-23.


Deep transfer learning for inter-chain contact predictions of transmembrane protein complexes.

Lin P, Yan Y, Tao H, Huang S Nat Commun. 2023; 14(1):4935.

PMID: 37582780 PMC: 10427616. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-40426-3.


Contact-Assisted Threading in Low-Homology Protein Modeling.

Bhattacharya S, Roche R, Shuvo M, Moussad B, Bhattacharya D Methods Mol Biol. 2023; 2627:41-59.

PMID: 36959441 PMC: 10340115. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-2974-1_3.


Machine learning in computational modelling of membrane protein sequences and structures: From methodologies to applications.

Sun J, Kulandaisamy A, Liu J, Hu K, Gromiha M, Zhang Y Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2023; 21:1205-1226.

PMID: 36817959 PMC: 9932300. DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2023.01.036.


References
1.
Wang S, Li W, Liu S, Xu J . RaptorX-Property: a web server for protein structure property prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016; 44(W1):W430-5. PMC: 4987890. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkw306. View

2.
Brunger A, Adams P, Clore G, DeLano W, Gros P, Grosse-Kunstleve R . Crystallography & NMR system: A new software suite for macromolecular structure determination. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 1998; 54(Pt 5):905-21. DOI: 10.1107/s0907444998003254. View

3.
Phatak M, Adamczak R, Cao B, Wagner M, Meller J . Solvent and lipid accessibility prediction as a basis for model quality assessment in soluble and membrane proteins. Curr Protein Pept Sci. 2011; 12(6):563-73. DOI: 10.2174/138920311796957603. View

4.
McAllister S, Floudas C . Alpha-helical topology prediction and generation of distance restraints in membrane proteins. Biophys J. 2008; 95(11):5281-95. PMC: 2586566. DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.108.132241. View

5.
Wang S, Peng J, Ma J, Xu J . Protein Secondary Structure Prediction Using Deep Convolutional Neural Fields. Sci Rep. 2016; 6:18962. PMC: 4707437. DOI: 10.1038/srep18962. View