» Articles » PMID: 28950298

Atezolizumab in Platinum-treated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: Post-progression Outcomes from the Phase II IMvigor210 Study

Overview
Journal Ann Oncol
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Oncology
Date 2017 Sep 27
PMID 28950298
Citations 143
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Conventional criteria for tumor progression may not fully reflect the clinical benefit of immunotherapy or appropriately guide treatment decisions. The phase II IMvigor210 study demonstrated the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab, a programmed death-ligand 1-directed antibody, in patients with platinum-treated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Patients could continue atezolizumab beyond Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 progression at the investigator's discretion: this analysis assessed post-progression outcomes in these patients.

Patients And Methods: Patients were treated with atezolizumab 1200 mg i.v. every 3 weeks until loss of clinical benefit. Efficacy and safety outcomes in patients who experienced RECIST v1.1 progression and did, or did not, continue atezolizumab were analyzed descriptively.

Results: In total, 220 patients who experienced progression from the overall cohort (n = 310) were analyzed: 137 continued atezolizumab for ≥ 1 dose after progression, 19 received other systemic therapy, and 64 received no further systemic therapy. Compared with those who discontinued, patients continuing atezolizumab beyond progression were more likely to have had a baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 (43.1% versus 31.3%), less likely to have had baseline liver metastases (27.0% versus 41.0%), and more likely to have had an initial response to atezolizumab (responses in 11.7% versus 1.2%). Five patients (3.6%) continuing atezolizumab after progression had subsequent responses compared with baseline measurements. Median post-progression overall survival was 8.6 months in patients continuing atezolizumab, 6.8 months in those receiving another treatment, and 1.2 months in those receiving no further treatment. Atezolizumab exposure-adjusted adverse event frequencies were generally similar before and following progression.

Conclusion: In this single-arm study, patients who continued atezolizumab beyond RECIST v1.1 progression derived prolonged clinical benefit without additional safety signals. Identification of patients most likely to benefit from atezolizumab beyond progression remains an important challenge in the management of metastatic urothelial carcinoma.

Clinicaltrials.gov Id: NCT02108652.

Citing Articles

Extracellular Vesicle-Based Strategies for Tumor Immunotherapy.

Jiramonai L, Liang X, Zhu M Pharmaceutics. 2025; 17(2).

PMID: 40006624 PMC: 11859549. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics17020257.


Integration of single-cell and bulk RNA sequencing to identify a distinct tumor stem cells and construct a novel prognostic signature for evaluating prognosis and immunotherapy in LUAD.

Zhao F, Chen M, Wu T, Ji M, Li F J Transl Med. 2025; 23(1):222.

PMID: 39987127 PMC: 11847374. DOI: 10.1186/s12967-025-06243-6.


Unveiling the crucial role of glycosylation modification in lung adenocarcinoma metastasis through artificial neural network-based spatial multi-omics single-cell analysis and Mendelian randomization.

Zhang P, Wang L, Liu H, Lin S, Guo D BMC Cancer. 2025; 25(1):249.

PMID: 39948531 PMC: 11823056. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-025-13650-x.


Integrated Multi-omics Data Analysis and Validation Reveal the Crucial Role of Glycogen Metabolism in Gastric Cancer.

Zhou X, Wu J, Liu Y, Wang X, Gao X, Xia X J Cancer. 2025; 16(4):1243-1263.

PMID: 39895799 PMC: 11786036. DOI: 10.7150/jca.104424.


Multi-omics analysis and experiments uncover the function of cancer stemness in ovarian cancer and establish a machine learning-based model for predicting immunotherapy responses.

Liu Z, Han L, Ji X, Wang X, Jian J, Zhai Y Front Immunol. 2024; 15:1486652.

PMID: 39726597 PMC: 11670203. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1486652.


References
1.
Rosenberg J, Hoffman-Censits J, Powles T, van der Heijden M, Balar A, Necchi A . Atezolizumab in patients with locally advanced and metastatic urothelial carcinoma who have progressed following treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy: a single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2016; 387(10031):1909-20. PMC: 5480242. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00561-4. View

2.
Bellmunt J, Choueiri T, Fougeray R, Schutz F, Salhi Y, Winquist E . Prognostic factors in patients with advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelial tract experiencing treatment failure with platinum-containing regimens. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28(11):1850-5. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.4599. View

3.
Rittmeyer A, Barlesi F, Waterkamp D, Park K, Ciardiello F, von Pawel J . Atezolizumab versus docetaxel in patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (OAK): a phase 3, open-label, multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016; 389(10066):255-265. PMC: 6886121. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32517-X. View

4.
Herbst R, Soria J, Kowanetz M, Fine G, Hamid O, Gordon M . Predictive correlates of response to the anti-PD-L1 antibody MPDL3280A in cancer patients. Nature. 2014; 515(7528):563-7. PMC: 4836193. DOI: 10.1038/nature14011. View

5.
Necchi A, Sonpavde G, Lo Vullo S, Giardiello D, Bamias A, Crabb S . Nomogram-based Prediction of Overall Survival in Patients with Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Receiving First-line Platinum-based Chemotherapy: Retrospective International Study of Invasive/Advanced Cancer of the Urothelium (RISC). Eur Urol. 2016; 71(2):281-289. PMC: 5576985. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.09.042. View