Cannabinoid CB Discrimination: Effects of Endocannabinoids and Catabolic Enzyme Inhibitors
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
An improved understanding of the endocannabinoid system has provided new avenues of drug discovery and development toward the management of pain and other behavioral maladies. Exogenous cannabinoid type 1 (CB) receptor agonists such as Δ-tetrahydrocannabinol are increasingly used for their medicinal actions; however, their utility is constrained by concern regarding abuse-related subjective effects. This has led to growing interest in the clinical benefit of indirectly enhancing the activity of the highly labile endocannabinoids -arachidonoylethanolamine [AEA (or anandamide)] and/or 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) via catabolic enzyme inhibition. The present studies were conducted to determine whether such actions can lead to CB agonist-like subjective effects, as reflected in CB-related discriminative stimulus effects in laboratory subjects. Squirrel monkeys ( = 8) that discriminated the CB full agonist AM4054 (0.01 mg/kg) from vehicle were used to study, first, the inhibitors of fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) or monoacylglycerol lipase (MGL) alone or in combination [FAAH (URB597, AM4303); MGL (AM4301); FAAH/MGL (JZL195, AM4302)] and, second, the ability of the endocannabinoids AEA and 2-AG to produce CB agonist-like effects when administered alone or after enzyme inhibition. Results indicate that CB-related discriminative stimulus effects were produced by combined, but not selective, inhibition of FAAH and MGL, and that these effects were nonsurmountably antagonized by low doses of rimonabant. Additionally, FAAH or MGL inhibition revealed CB-like subjective effects produced by AEA but not by 2-AG. Taken together, the present data suggest that therapeutic effects of combined, but not selective, enhancement of AEA or 2-AG activity via enzyme inhibition may be accompanied by CB receptor-mediated subjective effects.
Kangas B, Deshpande H, Withey S, Spealman R, Bergman J, Kohut S Neuropsychopharmacology. 2024; 50(3):576-585.
PMID: 39538014 PMC: 11735839. DOI: 10.1038/s41386-024-02024-9.
Jaiswal S, Akhilesh , Tiwari V, Ayyannan S Pharmacol Rep. 2023; 75(3):737-745.
PMID: 36913176 DOI: 10.1007/s43440-023-00468-2.
Antiemetic Effects of Cannabinoid Agonists in Nonhuman Primates.
Wooldridge L, Ji L, Liu Y, Nikas S, Makriyannis A, Bergman J J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2020; 374(3):462-468.
PMID: 32561684 PMC: 7445860. DOI: 10.1124/jpet.120.265710.
Dong B, Shilpa B, Shah R, Goyal A, Xie S, Bakalian M J Psychiatr Res. 2019; 120:103-112.
PMID: 31654971 PMC: 6916267. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2019.10.010.
Cannabinoid Antagonist Drug Discrimination in Nonhuman Primates.
Kangas B, Zakarian A, Vemuri K, Alapafuja S, Jiang S, Nikas S J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2019; 372(1):119-127.
PMID: 31641018 PMC: 6927407. DOI: 10.1124/jpet.119.261818.