» Articles » PMID: 28932941

Single-center Ventral Hernia Repair with Porcine Dermis Collagen Implant

Overview
Journal Surg Endosc
Publisher Springer
Date 2017 Sep 22
PMID 28932941
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: This study aims to evaluate the outcomes and utilization of porcine acellular dermal collagen implant (PADCI) during VHR at a large tertiary referral center.

Methods: Records of 5485 patients who underwent VIHR from June 1995 to August 2014 were retrospectively reviewed to identify patients >18 years of age who had VIHR with PADCI reinforcement. Use of multiple mesh reinforcement products, inguinal hernias, and hiatal hernias were exclusion criteria. The primary outcome was hernia recurrence, and secondary outcomes were early complications and surgical site occurrences (SSOs). Uni- and multivariate analyses assessed risk factors for recurrence after PADCI reinforced VIHR.

Results: There were 361 patients identified (54.5% female, mean age of 56.7 ± 12.5 years, and mean body mass index (BMI) of 33.0 ± 9.9 kg/m). Hypertension (49.5%), diabetes (24.3%), and coronary artery disease (14.4%) were the most common comorbidities, as was active smoking (20.7%). Most were classified as American Association of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Class 3 (61.7%). Hernias were distributed across all grades of the ventral hernia working group (VHWG) grading system: grade I 93 (25.7%), grade II 51 (14.1%), grade III 113 (31.3%), and grade IV 6 (1.6%). Most VIHR were performed from an open approach (96.1%), and were frequently combined with concomitant surgical procedures (47.9%). Early postoperative complications (first 30 days) were reported in 39.0%, with 71 being SSO. Of the 19.7% of patients with SSO, there were 31 who required procedural intervention. After a mean follow-up of 71.5 ± 20.5 months, hernia recurrence was documented in 34.9% of patients. Age and male gender were predictors of recurrence on multivariate analysis.

Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest retrospective single institutional study evaluating PADCI to date. Hernias repaired with PADCI were frequently in patients undergoing concomitant operations. Reinforcement with PADCI may be considered a temporary closure, with a relatively high recurrence rate, especially among patients who are older, male, and undergo multiple explorations in a short perioperative period.

Citing Articles

Abdominal wall hernia repair: from prosthetic meshes to smart materials.

Saiding Q, Chen Y, Wang J, Leite Pereira C, Sarmento B, Cui W Mater Today Bio. 2023; 21:100691.

PMID: 37455815 PMC: 10339210. DOI: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100691.


Biologic Mesh in Surgery: A Comprehensive Review and Meta-Analysis of Selected Outcomes in 51 Studies and 6079 Patients.

Samson D, Gachabayov M, Latifi R World J Surg. 2021; 45(12):3524-3540.

PMID: 33416939 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-020-05887-3.


Stomal stenosis during gradual closure of a traumatic abdominal wall hernia.

Suzuki M, Matsushima H, Uehara K, Saiki T, Hayamizu A, Kamisasanuki T Int J Surg Case Rep. 2019; 60:284-286.

PMID: 31265988 PMC: 6609734. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2019.06.020.


Systematic review of the stage of innovation of biological mesh for complex or contaminated abdominal wall closure.

Kamarajah S, Chapman S, Glasbey J, Morton D, Smart N, Pinkney T BJS Open. 2018; 2(6):371-380.

PMID: 30511038 PMC: 6254002. DOI: 10.1002/bjs5.78.


Indications and Outcomes of a Cross-Linked Porcine Dermal Collagen Mesh (Permacol) for Complex Abdominal Wall Reconstruction: A Multicenter Audit.

Doussot A, Abo-Alhassan F, Derbal S, Fournel I, Kasereka-Kisenge F, Codjia T World J Surg. 2018; 43(3):791-797.

PMID: 30426186 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-018-4853-x.

References
1.
Catena F, Ansaloni L, Gazzotti F, Gagliardi S, Di Saverio S, DAlessandro L . Use of porcine dermal collagen graft (Permacol) for hernia repair in contaminated fields. Hernia. 2006; 11(1):57-60. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-006-0171-6. View

2.
OBrien J, Ignotz R, Montilla R, Broderick G, Christakis A, Dunn R . Long-term histologic and mechanical results of a Permacol™ abdominal wall explant. Hernia. 2010; 15(2):211-5. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-010-0628-5. View

3.
Burger J, Luijendijk R, Hop W, Halm J, Verdaasdonk E, Jeekel J . Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann Surg. 2004; 240(4):578-83. PMC: 1356459. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000141193.08524.e7. View

4.
Majumder A, Winder J, Wen Y, Pauli E, Belyansky I, Novitsky Y . Comparative analysis of biologic versus synthetic mesh outcomes in contaminated hernia repairs. Surgery. 2016; 160(4):828-838. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.04.041. View

5.
Abid S, El-Hayek K . Which mesh or graft? Prosthetic devices for abdominal wall reconstruction. Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2016; 77(3):157-8, 159-61. DOI: 10.12968/hmed.2016.77.3.157. View