» Articles » PMID: 27452954

Comparative Analysis of Biologic Versus Synthetic Mesh Outcomes in Contaminated Hernia Repairs

Overview
Journal Surgery
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2016 Jul 26
PMID 27452954
Citations 57
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Contaminated operative fields pose significant challenges for surgeons performing ventral hernia repair. Although biologic meshes have been utilized increasingly in these fields, recent evidence suggests that synthetic meshes represent a viable option. We analyzed the outcomes of biologic and synthetic mesh utilized in patients undergoing major ventral hernia repair in clean-contaminated/contaminated fields.

Methods: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective review of patients undergoing open ventral hernia repair in clean-contaminated/contaminated fields using biologic or synthetic mesh. Patient and hernia details were characterized. Primary outcomes included 90-day surgical site event, surgical site infection, and hernia recurrence.

Results: A total of 126 patients undergoing major ventral hernia repair in clean-contaminated/contaminated fields (69 biologic and 57 synthetic meshes) were analyzed. Groups were similar in both patient and hernia characteristics. There were 13 (22.8%) surgical site events in the synthetic cohort compared to 29 (42.0%) in the biologic cohort, P = .024. Similarly, surgical site infections were less frequent in the synthetic group, with 7 (12.3%) vs 22 (31.9%), P = .01. With a mean follow-up of 20 months, there were more recurrences in the biologic group: 15 (26.3%) vs 4 (8.9%) in the synthetic group, P = .039.

Conclusion: The choice of mesh for clean-contaminated/contaminated ventral hernia repair remains debatable. We demonstrated that using synthetic sublay mesh resulted in a significantly lower wound morbidity and more durable outcomes versus a similar cohort of biologic repairs. This is likely secondary to improved bacterial clearance and faster integration of macroporous synthetics. Overall, our findings not only support suitability of synthetic mesh in contaminated settings but also challenge the purported advantage of biologics in clean-contaminated/contaminated ventral hernia repairs.

Citing Articles

Synthetic Versus Biologic Mesh for Complex Open Ventral Hernia Repair: 3-Year Follow-Up of a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Dhanani N, Lyons N, Lee K, Olavarria O, Arakelians A, Holihan J HCA Healthc J Med. 2025; 6(1):43-50.

PMID: 40071184 PMC: 11892401. DOI: 10.36518/2689-0216.1761.


Synthetic vs. biologic mesh for abdominal wall reconstruction in contaminated surgical fields. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and observational studies.

Frountzas M, Kanata D, Solia E, Smerdi D, Nikolaou C, Chamzin A Hernia. 2024; 29(1):43.

PMID: 39666204 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-024-03239-x.


Use of Biologic and Biosynthetic Mesh for Ventral Hernia Repair in Current Practice.

Mullens C, Schoel L, McGee M, Ehlers A, Telem D, Howard R JAMA Surg. 2024; 160(2):163-170.

PMID: 39661349 PMC: 11822553. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.5293.


Mesh exposure after ventral hernia repair with onlay biosynthetic mesh: a retrospective review of associated risk factors and management strategies.

Amro C, Ryan I, Lemdani M, Bascone C, McAuliffe P, Desai A Hernia. 2024; 28(6):2165-2176.

PMID: 39304545 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-024-03108-7.


Early Experience with Mesh Suture for DIEP Flap Abdominal Site Closures.

Hackenberger P, Stockslager C, Selimos B, Teven C, Fracol M, Howard M Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024; 12(8):e6095.

PMID: 39175518 PMC: 11340925. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006095.