» Articles » PMID: 28916808

The Effects of Domestication and Ontogeny on Cognition in Dogs and Wolves

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2017 Sep 17
PMID 28916808
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cognition is one of the most flexible tools enabling adaptation to environmental variation. Living close to humans is thought to influence social as well as physical cognition of animals throughout domestication and ontogeny. Here, we investigated to what extent physical cognition and two domains of social cognition of dogs have been affected by domestication and ontogeny. To address the effects of domestication, we compared captive wolves (n = 12) and dogs (n = 14) living in packs under the same conditions. To explore developmental effects, we compared these dogs to pet dogs (n = 12) living in human families. The animals were faced with a series of object-choice tasks, in which their response to communicative, behavioural and causal cues was tested. We observed that wolves outperformed dogs in their ability to follow causal cues, suggesting that domestication altered specific skills relating to this domain, whereas developmental effects had surprisingly no influence. All three groups performed similarly in the communicative and behavioural conditions, suggesting higher ontogenetic flexibility in the two social domains. These differences across cognitive domains need to be further investigated, by comparing domestic and non-domesticated animals living in varying conditions.

Citing Articles

Participation in a Prison-Based Training Programme Is Beneficial for Rescue Dogs.

Leonardi R, Vick S, Buchanan-Smith H Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(11).

PMID: 38891576 PMC: 11171100. DOI: 10.3390/ani14111530.


The Role of Life History and Familiarity in Performance of Working and Non-Working Dogs () in a Point-Following Task.

McCartney J, Leavens D Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(4).

PMID: 38396541 PMC: 10885941. DOI: 10.3390/ani14040573.


Why do dogs wag their tails?.

Leonetti S, Cimarelli G, Hersh T, Ravignani A Biol Lett. 2024; 20(1):20230407.

PMID: 38229554 PMC: 10792393. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2023.0407.


Domestication and breeding objective did not shape the interpretation of physical and social cues in goats (Capra hircus).

Nawroth C, Wiesmann K, Schlup P, Keil N, Langbein J Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):19098.

PMID: 37925577 PMC: 10625633. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-46373-9.


Visual perception of emotion cues in dogs: a critical review of methodologies.

Correia-Caeiro C, Guo K, Mills D Anim Cogn. 2023; 26(3):727-754.

PMID: 36870003 PMC: 10066124. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-023-01762-5.


References
1.
Range F, Viranyi Z . Development of gaze following abilities in wolves (Canis lupus). PLoS One. 2011; 6(2):e16888. PMC: 3044139. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016888. View

2.
Gacsi M, Kara E, Belenyi B, Topal J, Miklosi A . The effect of development and individual differences in pointing comprehension of dogs. Anim Cogn. 2009; 12(3):471-9. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-008-0208-6. View

3.
Kaminski J, Schulz L, Tomasello M . How dogs know when communication is intended for them. Dev Sci. 2012; 15(2):222-32. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01120.x. View

4.
Riedel J, Buttelmann D, Call J, Tomasello M . Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) use a physical marker to locate hidden food. Anim Cogn. 2005; 9(1):27-35. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-005-0256-0. View

5.
Range F, Viranyi Z . Wolves are better imitators of conspecifics than dogs. PLoS One. 2014; 9(1):e86559. PMC: 3906065. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086559. View