Do Pet Dogs () Follow Ostensive and Non-ostensive Human Gaze to Distant Space and to Objects?

Overview

Journal R Soc Open Sci

Specialty Science

Date 2017 Aug 10

PMID 28791164

Citations 17

Authors

Charlotte Duranton

Friederike Range

Zsofia Viranyi

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Dogs are renowned for being skilful at using human-given communicative cues such as pointing. Results are contradictory, however, when it comes to dogs' following human gaze, probably due to methodological discrepancies. Here we investigated whether dogs follow human gaze to one of two food locations better than into distant space even after comparable pre-training. In Experiments 1 and 2, the gazing direction of dogs was recorded in a gaze-following into distant space and in an object-choice task where no choice was allowed, in order to allow a direct comparison between tasks, varying the ostensive nature of the gazes. We found that dogs only followed repeated ostensive human gaze into distant space, whereas they followed all gaze cues in the object-choice task. Dogs followed human gaze better in the object-choice task than when there was no obvious target to look at. In Experiment 3, dogs were tested in another object-choice task and were allowed to approach a container. Ostensive cues facilitated the dogs' following gaze with gaze as well as their choices: we found that dogs in the ostensive group chose the indicated container at chance level, whereas they avoided this container in the non-ostensive group. We propose that dogs may perceive the object-choice task as a competition over food and may interpret non-ostensive gaze as an intentional cue that indicates the experimenter's interest in the food location she has looked at. Whether ostensive cues simply mitigate the competitive perception of this situation or they alter how dogs interpret communicative gaze needs further investigation. Our findings also show that following gaze with one's gaze and actually choosing one of the two containers in an object-choice task need to be considered as different variables. The present study clarifies a number of questions related to gaze-following in dogs and adds to a growing body of evidence showing that human ostensive cues can strongly modify dog behaviour.

Citing Articles

Canine perspective taking: Anticipating the behavior of an unseen human.

Huber L, van der Wolf P, Menkveld M, Riemer S, Volter C iScience. 2025; 28(2):111811.

PMID: 39949961 PMC: 11821393. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.111811.

Using mobile eye tracking to study dogs' understanding of human referential communication.

Volter C, Gerwisch K, Berg P, Viranyi Z, Huber L Proc Biol Sci. 2025; 292(2040):20242765.

PMID: 39933589 PMC: 11813580. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2024.2765.

Dogs do not use their own experience with novel barriers to infer others' visual access.

Lonardo L, Putnik M, Szewczak V, Huber L, Volter C Proc Biol Sci. 2024; 291(2024):20232934.

PMID: 38864326 PMC: 7616301. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2023.2934.

Domestic dogs as a comparative model for social neuroscience: Advances and challenges.

Boch M, Huber L, Lamm C Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2024; 162:105700.

PMID: 38710423 PMC: 7616343. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105700.

Investigating belief understanding in children in a nonverbal ambiguous displacement and communication setting.

Guran C, Lonardo L, Tunte M, Arzberger K, Volter C, Hoehl S J Exp Child Psychol. 2023; 240:105830.

PMID: 38104460 PMC: 7616302. DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2023.105830.

References

Csibra G, Gergely G . Natural pedagogy. Trends Cogn Sci. 2009; 13(4):148-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2009.01.005. View

Oliva J, Rault J, Appleton B, Lill A . Oxytocin enhances the appropriate use of human social cues by the domestic dog (Canis familiaris) in an object choice task. Anim Cogn. 2015; 18(3):767-75. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-015-0843-7. View

Bugnyar T, Stowe M, Heinrich B . Ravens, Corvus corax, follow gaze direction of humans around obstacles. Proc Biol Sci. 2004; 271(1546):1331-6. PMC: 1691735. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2738. View

Miklosi A, Soproni K . A comparative analysis of animals' understanding of the human pointing gesture. Anim Cogn. 2005; 9(2):81-93. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-005-0008-1. View

Elgier A, Jakovcevic A, Barrera G, Mustaca A, Bentosela M . Communication between domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) and humans: dogs are good learners. Behav Processes. 2009; 81(3):402-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2009.03.017. View

Brauer J, Kaminski J, Riedel J, Call J, Tomasello M . Making inferences about the location of hidden food: social dog, causal ape. J Comp Psychol. 2006; 120(1):38-47. DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.120.1.38. View

Cooper R, Aslin R . Preference for infant-directed speech in the first month after birth. Child Dev. 1990; 61(5):1584-95. View

Topal J, Gergely G, Erdohegyi A, Csibra G, Miklosi A . Differential sensitivity to human communication in dogs, wolves, and human infants. Science. 2009; 325(5945):1269-72. DOI: 10.1126/science.1176960. View

Burnham D, Kitamura C, Vollmer-Conna U . What's new, pussycat? On talking to babies and animals. Science. 2002; 296(5572):1435. DOI: 10.1126/science.1069587. View

10.

Kis A, Hernadi A, Kanizsar O, Gacsi M, Topal J . Oxytocin induces positive expectations about ambivalent stimuli (cognitive bias) in dogs. Horm Behav. 2014; 69:1-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2014.12.004. View

11.

Teufel C, Gutmann A, Pirow R, Fischer J . Facial expressions modulate the ontogenetic trajectory of gaze-following among monkeys. Dev Sci. 2010; 13(6):913-22. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.00956.x. View

12.

Soproni K, Miklosi A, Topal J, Csanyi V . Dogs' (Canis familiaris) responsiveness to human pointing gestures. J Comp Psychol. 2002; 116(1):27-34. DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.116.1.27. View

13.

Gacsi M, McGreevy P, Kara E, Miklosi A . Effects of selection for cooperation and attention in dogs. Behav Brain Funct. 2009; 5:31. PMC: 2731781. DOI: 10.1186/1744-9081-5-31. View

14.

Werhahn G, Viranyi Z, Barrera G, Sommese A, Range F . Wolves (Canis lupus) and dogs (Canis familiaris) differ in following human gaze into distant space but respond similar to their packmates' gaze. J Comp Psychol. 2016; 130(3):288-98. PMC: 5321535. DOI: 10.1037/com0000036. View

15.

Range F, Viranyi Z . Development of gaze following abilities in wolves (Canis lupus). PLoS One. 2011; 6(2):e16888. PMC: 3044139. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016888. View

16.

Soproni K, Miklosi A, Topal J, Csanyi V . Comprehension of human communicative signs in pet dogs (Canis familiaris). J Comp Psychol. 2001; 115(2):122-6. DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.115.2.122. View

17.

Hare B . Can competitive paradigms increase the validity of experiments on primate social cognition?. Anim Cogn. 2014; 4(3-4):269-80. DOI: 10.1007/s100710100084. View

18.

ANDERSON J, Mitchell R . Macaques but not lemurs co-orient visually with humans. Folia Primatol (Basel). 1999; 70(1):17-22. DOI: 10.1159/000021670. View

19.

Miklosi A, Polgardi R, Topal J, Csanyi V . Use of experimenter-given cues in dogs. Anim Cogn. 2014; 1(2):113-21. DOI: 10.1007/s100710050016. View

20.

Tomasello M, Call J, Hare B . Chimpanzees understand psychological states - the question is which ones and to what extent. Trends Cogn Sci. 2003; 7(4):153-156. DOI: 10.1016/s1364-6613(03)00035-4. View