» Articles » PMID: 28900781

Submillisievert Imaging Protocol Using Full Reconstruction and Advanced Patient Motion Correction in 320-row Area Detector Coronary CT Angiography

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Radiology
Date 2017 Sep 14
PMID 28900781
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Radiation exposure remains a concern in the use of coronary CT angiography (CCTA). Full reconstruction (Full) and reconstruction using advanced patient motion correction (APMC) could obtain a lower radiation dose using low tube current scanning in a 320-row Area Detector CT (320-ADCT). The radiation dose for an imaging protocol using Full and APMC in daily practice was estimated. A total of 209 patients who underwent CCTA in 1 rotation scanning with 100 kv and adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D in 320-ADCT were enrolled. Imaging protocols were classified into 3 groups based on estimated slow filling time: (1) slow filling time ≥ 275 msec, Full with 30% of usual tube current (N = 43)(Full30%mA) (2) 206.3 msec ≤ slow filling time < 275 msec, APMC with 50% of usual tube current (N = 48)(APMC50%mA); and (3) 137.5 msec ≤ slow filling time < 206.3 msec, Half reconstruction with usual tube current (N = 118)(Half100%mA). Radiation dose was estimated by the effective dose. The diagnostic accuracy of CCTA was compared with that of invasive coronary angiography in 28 patients. The effective doses of Full30%mA, APMC50%mA, and Half100%mA were 0.77 ± 0.31, 1.30 ± 0.85, and 1.98 ± 0.68, respectively. Of 28 patients, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value in vessel-based analyses were: Full30%mA, 66.7, 82.4, 80.0, 40.0, and 93.3%; APMC50%mA, 100.0, 80.0, 83.3, 50.05, and 100.0%; and Half100%mA, 90.9, 83.0, 86.3, 78.95, and 92.9%, respectively. An imaging protocol using Full30%mA and APMC50%mA was one of the methods how radiation dose could be reduced radiation dose maintained diagnostic accuracy compared to imaging using conventional Half100%mA.

Citing Articles

Incremental Diagnostic Value of CT Fractional Flow Reserve Using Subtraction Method in Patients with Severe Calcification: A Pilot Study.

Kamo Y, Fujimoto S, Nozaki Y, Aoshima C, Kawaguchi Y, Dohi T J Clin Med. 2021; 10(19).

PMID: 34640414 PMC: 8509262. DOI: 10.3390/jcm10194398.


Network Medicine: A Clinical Approach for Precision Medicine and Personalized Therapy in Coronary Heart Disease.

Infante T, Del Viscovo L, De Rimini M, Padula S, Caso P, Napoli C J Atheroscler Thromb. 2019; 27(4):279-302.

PMID: 31723086 PMC: 7192819. DOI: 10.5551/jat.52407.


Cardiovascular imaging 2017 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Reiber J, Alaiti A, Bezerra H, De Sutter J, Schoenhagen P, Stillman A Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018; 34(6):833-848.

PMID: 29651658 DOI: 10.1007/s10554-018-1349-6.

References
1.
Tanaka R, Yoshioka K, Muranaka K, Chiba T, Ueda T, Sasaki T . Improved evaluation of calcified segments on coronary CT angiography: a feasibility study of coronary calcium subtraction. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013; 29 Suppl 2:75-81. DOI: 10.1007/s10554-013-0316-5. View

2.
Oda S, Utsunomiya D, Funama Y, Yonenaga K, Namimoto T, Nakaura T . A hybrid iterative reconstruction algorithm that improves the image quality of low-tube-voltage coronary CT angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012; 198(5):1126-31. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.11.7117. View

3.
Hou Y, Ma Y, Fan W, Wang Y, Yu M, Vembar M . Diagnostic accuracy of low-dose 256-slice multi-detector coronary CT angiography using iterative reconstruction in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Eur Radiol. 2013; 24(1):3-11. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-013-2969-9. View

4.
Mori S, Nishizawa K, Ohno M, Endo M . Conversion factor for CT dosimetry to assess patient dose using a 256-slice CT scanner. Br J Radiol. 2006; 79(947):888-92. DOI: 10.1259/bjr/66519303. View

5.
Matsutani H, Sano T, Kondo T, Morita H, Arai T, Sekine T . ECG-edit function in multidetector-row computed tomography coronary arteriography for patients with arrhythmias. Circ J. 2008; 72(7):1071-8. DOI: 10.1253/circj.72.1071. View