» Articles » PMID: 28890222

Identifying Subsets of Patients with Single-level Degenerative Disc Disease for Lumbar Fusion: the Value of Prognostic Tests in Surgical Decision Making

Overview
Journal Spine J
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2017 Sep 12
PMID 28890222
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background Context: Fusion surgery for degenerative disc disease (DDD) has become a standard of care, albeit not without controversy. Outcomes are inconsistent and a superiority over conservative treatment is debatable. Proper patient selection is key to clinical success, and a comprehensive understanding of prognostic tests does not currently exist.

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the value of prognostic tests and sociodemographic factors in predicting outcomes following lumbar fusion surgery for DDD.

Study Design: This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data.

Patient Sample: We included patients who underwent fusion surgery for DDD between 2010 and 2016.

Outcome Measures: The outcome measures included pre- and postoperative visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index scores.

Materials And Methods: Prospectively collected patient data were reviewed for preoperative tests, perioperative data, and clinical outcomes. Prognostic tests used were discography, pantaloon cast test (PCT), Modic changes, and a summary of physical symptoms, coined "loading factor." By means of multivariate stepwise regression, prognostic factors that were useful in predicting outcomes were identified.

Results: A total of 91 patients fit the inclusion criteria, with a mean follow-up of 33±16 months. Discography, Modic changes, and loading factor were of no value for predicting outcome scores (p>.05). A positive PCT predicted improved outcomes in back pain severity, but only in patients without prior surgery (p=.02). Demographic factors that showed a consistent reduction in back pain were female sex (p=.021) and no prior surgery at index level (p=.009). No other sociodemographic factors were of predictive value (p>.05).

Conclusions: In patients without prior surgery, the PCT appears to be the most promising prognostic tool. Other prognostic selection tools such as discography and Modic changes yield disappointing results. In this study, female patients and those without prior spine surgery appear to be most likely to benefit from fusion surgery for DDD.

Citing Articles

Multicenter external validation of prediction models for clinical outcomes after spinal fusion for lumbar degenerative disease.

Grob A, Rohr J, Stumpo V, Vieli M, Ciobanu-Caraus O, Ricciardi L Eur Spine J. 2024; 33(9):3534-3544.

PMID: 38987513 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-024-08395-3.


Rate of Reoperation Following Decompression-Only Procedure for Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review of Literature.

Muthu S, Corluka S, Buser Z, Malcolm J, Luo Z, Gollahalli Shivashankar P JB JS Open Access. 2024; 9(3).

PMID: 38974406 PMC: 11221853. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.23.00163.


Correlation between the degree of pain relief following discoblock and short-term surgical disability outcome among patients with suspected discogenic low back pain.

Korhonen T, Pesala J, Jarvinen J, Haapea M, Niinimaki J Scand J Pain. 2022; 22(3):526-532.

PMID: 35355491 DOI: 10.1515/sjpain-2021-0160.


FUSE-ML: development and external validation of a clinical prediction model for mid-term outcomes after lumbar spinal fusion for degenerative disease.

Staartjes V, Stumpo V, Ricciardi L, Maldaner N, Eversdijk H, Vieli M Eur Spine J. 2022; 31(10):2629-2638.

PMID: 35188587 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-022-07135-9.


Prognostic factors for outcome following lumbar spine fusion surgery: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.

Achttien R, Powell A, Zoulas K, Staal J, Rushton A Eur Spine J. 2021; 31(3):623-668.

PMID: 34705106 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-021-07018-5.