Rate of Reoperation Following Decompression-Only Procedure for Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review of Literature

Overview

Journal JB JS Open Access

Date 2024 Jul 8

PMID 38974406

Authors

Sathish Muthu

Stipe Corluka

Zorica Buser

James G Malcolm

Zhuojing Luo

Prajwal Gollahalli Shivashankar

Luca Ambrosio

Cristiana Griffoni

Andreas K Demetriades

Stjepan Ivandic

Yabin Wu

Jeffrey Wang

Hans-Jorg Meisel

Tim Sangwook Yoon

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Management of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis with decompression-only procedure has been performed for its added benefit of a shorter duration of surgery, lower blood loss, and shorter hospital stay. However, reported failure rates for decompression-only procedures vary depending on the methods utilized for decompression. Hence, we aim to identify the failure rates of individual methods of decompression-only procedures performed for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.

Methods: An independent systematic review of 4 scientific databases (PubMed, Scopus, clinicaltrials.gov, Web of Science) was performed to identify relevant articles as per the preferred reporting in systematic reviews and meta-analysis guidelines. Studies reporting on failure rates defined by reoperation at the index level following decompression-only procedure for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis were included for analysis. Studies were appraised using ROBINS tool of Cochrane, and analysis was performed using the Open Meta[Analyst] software.

Results: The overall failure rate of decompression-only procedure was 9.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] [6.5-11.7]). Furthermore, open decompression had failure rate of 10.9% (95% CI [6.0-15.8]), while microendoscopic decompression had failure rate of 6.7% (95% CI [2.9-10.6]). The failure rate gradually increased from 6.9% (95% CI [2.0-11.7]) at 1 year to 7% (95% CI [3.6-10.3]), 11.7% (95% CI [4.5-18.9]), and 11.7% (95% CI [6.6-16.7]) at 2, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Single level decompression had a failure rate of 9.6% (95% CI [6.3-12.9]), while multilevel decompression recorded a failure rate of 8.7% (95% CI [5.6-11.7]).

Conclusion: High-quality evidence on the decompression-only procedure for degenerative spondylolisthesis is limited. The decompression-only procedure had an overall failure rate of 9.1% without significant differences between the decompression techniques.

Level Of Evidence: Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Citing Articles

Learning curve insights in Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic (UBE) spinal procedures: proficiency cutoffs and the impact on efficiency and complications.

Peng J, Lin R, Fang D, He Z, Zhao Q, Li Q Eur Spine J. 2025; 34(3):954-973.

PMID: 39751813 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-024-08632-9.

References

Minamide A, Simpson A, Okada M, Enyo Y, Nakagawa Y, Iwasaki H . Microendoscopic Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: The Influence of Spondylolisthesis Stage (Disc Height and Static and Dynamic Translation) on Clinical Outcomes. Clin Spine Surg. 2018; 32(1):E20-E26. DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000710. View

Ghogawala Z, Dziura J, Butler W, Dai F, Terrin N, Magge S . Laminectomy plus Fusion versus Laminectomy Alone for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis. N Engl J Med. 2016; 374(15):1424-34. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1508788. View

Forsth P, Olafsson G, Carlsson T, Frost A, Borgstrom F, Fritzell P . A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Fusion Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2016; 374(15):1413-23. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1513721. View

Sato S, Yagi M, Machida M, Yasuda A, Konomi T, Miyake A . Reoperation rate and risk factors of elective spinal surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis: minimum 5-year follow-up. Spine J. 2015; 15(7):1536-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.02.009. View

Austevoll I, Hermansen E, Fagerland M, Storheim K, Brox J, Solberg T . Decompression with or without Fusion in Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis. N Engl J Med. 2021; 385(6):526-538. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2100990. View

Yagi M, Fujita N, Okada E, Tsuji O, Nagoshi N, Tsuji T . Comparisons of direct costs, outcomes, and cost-utility of decompression surgery with fusion versus decompression alone for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. J Orthop Sci. 2018; 23(4):653-657. DOI: 10.1016/j.jos.2018.04.001. View

Cheng X, Chen B . Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Decompression for Geriatric Patients with Central Spinal Stenosis and Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Novel Surgical Technique and Clinical Outcomes. Clin Interv Aging. 2020; 15:1213-1219. PMC: 7419630. DOI: 10.2147/CIA.S258702. View

Alimi M, Hofstetter C, Pyo S, Paulo D, Hartl R . Minimally invasive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with and without preoperative spondylolisthesis: clinical outcome and reoperation rates. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015; 22(4):339-52. DOI: 10.3171/2014.11.SPINE13597. View

Montano N, Stifano V, Papacci F, Mazzucchi E, Fernandez E . Minimally invasive decompression in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis associated with lumbar spinal stenosis. Report of a surgical series and review of the literature. Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2018; 52(4):448-458. DOI: 10.1016/j.pjnns.2018.06.004. View

10.

Liang Z, Xu X, Rao J, Chen Y, Wang R, Chen C . Clinical Evaluation of Paraspinal Mini-Tubular Lumbar Decompression and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis Grade I with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Cohort Study. Front Surg. 2022; 9:906289. PMC: 9127301. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.906289. View

11.

Ramhmdani S, Xia Y, Xu R, Kosztowski T, Sciubba D, Witham T . Iatrogenic Spondylolisthesis Following Open Lumbar Laminectomy: Case Series and Review of the Literature. World Neurosurg. 2018; 113:e383-e390. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.02.039. View

12.

Minamide A, Yoshida M, Simpson A, Nakagawa Y, Iwasaki H, Tsutsui S . Minimally invasive spinal decompression for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis and stenosis maintains stability and may avoid the need for fusion. Bone Joint J. 2018; 100-B(4):499-506. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B4.BJJ-2017-0917.R1. View

13.

Bisson E, Mummaneni P, Virk M, Knightly J, Alvi M, Goyal A . Open versus minimally invasive decompression for low-grade spondylolisthesis: analysis from the Quality Outcomes Database. J Neurosurg Spine. 2020; 33(3):349-359. DOI: 10.3171/2020.3.SPINE191239. View

14.

Moayeri N, Rampersaud Y . Revision surgery following minimally invasive decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis with and without stable degenerative spondylolisthesis: a 5- to 15-year reoperation survival analysis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2021; 36(3):385-391. DOI: 10.3171/2021.6.SPINE2144. View

15.

Guigui P, Barre E, Benoist M, Deburge A . Radiologic and computed tomography image evaluation of bone regrowth after wide surgical decompression for lumbar stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999; 24(3):281-8; discussion 288-9. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199902010-00018. View

16.

Sugiura T, Okuda S, Takenaka S, Nagamoto Y, Matsumoto T, Takahashi Y . Comparing Investigation Between Bilateral Partial Laminectomy and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Mild Degenerative Spondylolisthesis. Clin Spine Surg. 2020; 34(7):E403-E409. DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001109. View

17.

Matsunaga S, Sakou T, Morizono Y, Masuda A, Demirtas A . Natural history of degenerative spondylolisthesis. Pathogenesis and natural course of the slippage. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1990; 15(11):1204-10. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199011010-00021. View

18.

Inose H, Kato T, Yuasa M, Yamada T, Maehara H, Hirai T . Comparison of Decompression, Decompression Plus Fusion, and Decompression Plus Stabilization for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Prospective, Randomized Study. Clin Spine Surg. 2018; 31(7):E347-E352. PMC: 6072383. DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000659. View

19.

Page M, McKenzie J, Bossuyt P, Boutron I, Hoffmann T, Mulrow C . The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021; 372:n71. PMC: 8005924. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n71. View

20.

Kuo C, Merchant M, Kardile M, Yacob A, Majid K, Bains R . In Degenerative Spondylolisthesis, Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression Leads to Less Reoperations at 5 Years When Compared to Posterior Decompression With Instrumented Fusion: A Propensity-matched Retrospective Analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019; 44(21):1530-1537. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003121. View