» Articles » PMID: 28885381

Characteristics of Medical Adverse Events/Near Misses Associated With Laparoscopic/Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Retrospective Study Based on the Japanese National Database of Medical Adverse Events

Overview
Journal J Patient Saf
Specialty Health Services
Date 2017 Sep 9
PMID 28885381
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to clarify the characteristics of adverse events/near misses during laparoscopic/thoracoscopic surgery.

Methods: Using relevant key words for minimally invasive surgeries, 540 records were identified in the database of the Japan Council for Quality Health Care. After data review and the classification of adverse events, 746 events associated with laparoscopic (laparo group) and/or thoracoscopic (thoraco group) surgery were identified. We calculated the frequency of each event, compared the frequency regarding recurrent events, and evaluated the types of event that had resulted in deaths between the 2 groups.

Results: There were 582 events in the laparo group, 159 in the thoraco group, and 5 in those undergoing combined surgery. Overall, injury of other organs (11.4%, 85/746), retention of a foreign body (9.1%, 68/746), breakage/failure of medical equipment or devices (6.2%, 46/746), massive bleeding (5.9%, 44/746), misperception of anatomy (5.6%, 42/746), and vascular injury (4.8%, 36/746) were frequently reported. There were marked differences in the frequency of injury of other organs (laparo group: 13.4%, 78/582; thoraco group: 4.4%, 7/159), massive bleeding (laparo group: 3.4%, 20/582; thoraco group: 14.5%, 23/159), and vascular injury (laparo group: 2.6%, 15/582; thoraco group: 12.6%, 20/159) between the 2 groups. Among the 56 patient-death reports, 132 adverse events were identified. In the thoraco group, bleeding events were frequently observed, whereas in the laparo group, various categories of events were noted.

Conclusions: We observed recurrent incidents and differences in the frequency between the 2 groups. Surgeons should keep in mind these characteristics. Retention of a foreign body and the breakage/malfunctioning of instruments might be reduced by the introduction of specialized checklists.

Citing Articles

The Assessment and Response of Rehabilitation Professionals to Sudden Deterioration in Symptoms: An Analysis of the National Database in Japan.

Sasanuma N, Takahashi K, Eguchi A, Yamauchi S, Uchiyama Y, Domen K Phys Ther Res. 2024; 27(1):21-34.

PMID: 38690533 PMC: 11057387. DOI: 10.1298/ptr.E10272.


Addressing the important error of missing surgical items in an operated patient.

Susmallian S, Barnea R, Azaria B, Szyper-Kravitz M Isr J Health Policy Res. 2022; 11(1):19.

PMID: 35382877 PMC: 8981682. DOI: 10.1186/s13584-022-00530-z.

References
1.
Yasuhara H, Fukatsu K, Komatsu T, Murakoshi S, Saito Y, Uetera Y . Occult risk of broken instruments for endoscopy-assisted surgery. World J Surg. 2014; 38(11):3015-22. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-014-2666-0. View

2.
Kawachi R, Tsukada H, Nakazato Y, Takei H, Koshi-ishi Y, Goya T . Morbidity in video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy for clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer: is VATS lobectomy really safe?. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009; 57(3):156-9. DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1039267. View

3.
Gawande A, Studdert D, Orav E, Brennan T, Zinner M . Risk factors for retained instruments and sponges after surgery. N Engl J Med. 2003; 348(3):229-35. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa021721. View

4.
Gibbs V . Retained surgical items and minimally invasive surgery. World J Surg. 2011; 35(7):1532-9. PMC: 3140941. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-011-1060-4. View

5.
Mei J, Pu Q, Liao H, Ma L, Zhu Y, Liu L . A novel method for troubleshooting vascular injury during anatomic thoracoscopic pulmonary resection without conversion to thoracotomy. Surg Endosc. 2012; 27(2):530-7. PMC: 3580039. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2475-1. View