» Articles » PMID: 28847897

Derivation and Validation of a Novel Right-Sided Heart Failure Model After Implantation of Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices: The EUROMACS (European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support) Right-Sided Heart Failure...

Overview
Journal Circulation
Date 2017 Aug 30
PMID 28847897
Citations 72
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The aim of the study was to derive and validate a novel risk score for early right-sided heart failure (RHF) after left ventricular assist device implantation.

Methods: The EUROMACS (European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support) was used to identify adult patients undergoing continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation with mainstream devices. Eligible patients (n=2988) were randomly divided into derivation (n=2000) and validation (n=988) cohorts. The primary outcome was early (<30 days) severe postoperative RHF, defined as receiving short- or long-term right-sided circulatory support, continuous inotropic support for ≥14 days, or nitric oxide ventilation for ≥48 hours. The secondary outcome was all-cause mortality and length of stay in the intensive care unit. Covariates found to be associated with RHF (exploratory univariate <0.10) were entered into a multivariable logistic regression model. A risk score was then generated using the relative magnitude of the exponential regression model coefficients of independent predictors at the last step after checking for collinearity, likelihood ratio test, c index, and clinical weight at each step.

Results: A 9.5-point risk score incorporating 5 variables (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support class, use of multiple inotropes, severe right ventricular dysfunction on echocardiography, ratio of right atrial/pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, hemoglobin) was created. The mean scores in the derivation and validation cohorts were 2.7±1.9 and 2.6±2.0, respectively (=0.32). RHF in the derivation cohort occurred in 433 patients (21.7%) after left ventricular assist device implantation and was associated with a lower 1-year (53% versus 71%; <0.001) and 2-year (45% versus 58%; <0.001) survival compared with patients without RHF. RHF risk ranged from 11% (low risk score 0-2) to 43.1% (high risk score >4; <0.0001). Median intensive care unit stay was 7 days (interquartile range, 4-15 days) versus 24 days (interquartile range, 14-38 days) in patients without versus with RHF, respectively (<0.001). The c index of the composite score was 0.70 in the derivation and 0.67 in the validation cohort. The EUROMACS-RHF risk score outperformed (<0.0001) previously published scores and known individual echocardiographic and hemodynamic markers of RHF.

Conclusions: This novel EUROMACS-RHF risk score outperformed currently known risk scores and clinical predictors of early postoperative RHF. This novel score may be useful for tailored risk-based clinical assessment and management of patients with advanced HF evaluated for ventricular assist device therapy.

Citing Articles

A study on the global patterns in the design and development of ventricular assist devices: a visualization approach.

Sood A, Prasada Rao A Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025; 12:1371443.

PMID: 39981347 PMC: 11841463. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1371443.


Iron Deficiency in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

Nielsen W, Gustafsson F Card Fail Rev. 2024; 10:e08.

PMID: 39144580 PMC: 11322955. DOI: 10.15420/cfr.2023.26.


Management of Pulmonary Hypertension in Patients on Left Ventricular Assist Device Support.

Salem M, Al-Saffar F, Hall S Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 23(9):308.

PMID: 39077707 PMC: 11262404. DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2309308.


Cardiac power output ratio: Novel survival predictor after percutaneous ventricular assist device in cardiogenic shock.

Leung C, Wong I, Ho C, Chiang M, Fong Y, Lee P ESC Heart Fail. 2024; 11(6):3674-3686.

PMID: 38982624 PMC: 11631333. DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.14949.


Artificial Intelligence Approaches for Predicting the Risks of Durable Mechanical Circulatory Support Therapy and Cardiac Transplantation.

Grzyb C, Du D, Nair N J Clin Med. 2024; 13(7).

PMID: 38610843 PMC: 11013005. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13072076.