» Articles » PMID: 38329583

Right Ventricular Dysfunction in Left Ventricular Assist Device Candidates: is It Time to Change Our Prospective?

Abstract

The use of left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) has significantly increased in the last years, trying to offer a therapeutic alternative to heart transplantation, in light also to the significant heart donor shortage compared to the growing advanced heart failure population. Despite technological improvements in the devices, LVAD-related mortality is still fairly high, with right heart failure being one of the predominant predictors. Therefore, many efforts have been made toward a thorough right ventricular (RV) evaluation prior to LVAD implant, considering clinical, laboratory, echocardiographic, and invasive hemodynamic parameters. However, there is high heterogeneity regarding both which predictor is the strongest as well as the relative cut-off values, and a consensus has not been reached yet, increasing the risk of facing patients in which the distinction between good or poor RV function cannot be surely reached. In parallel, due to technological development and availability of mechanical circulatory support of the RV, LVADs are being considered even in patients with suboptimal RV function. The aim of our review is to analyze the current evidence regarding the role of RV function prior to LVAD and its evaluation, pointing out the extreme variability in parameters that are currently assessed and future prospective regarding new diagnostic tools. Finally, we attempt to gather the available information on the therapeutic strategies to use in the peri-operative phase, in order to reduce the incidence of RV failure, especially in patients in which the preoperative evaluation highlighted some conflicting results with regard to ventricular function.

Citing Articles

The Prognostic Role of Pulmonary Arterial Elastance in Patients Undergoing Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: A Pilot Study.

Di Mauro M, Kittleson M, Cacioli G, Piazza V, Putini R, Gravino R J Clin Med. 2024; 13(23).

PMID: 39685561 PMC: 11642144. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13237102.


The ProtekDuo Cannula: A Comprehensive Review of Efficacy and Clinical Applications in Right Ventricular Failure.

Brewer J, Maybauer M J Clin Med. 2024; 13(14).

PMID: 39064117 PMC: 11278424. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13144077.

References
1.
Ruiz-Cano M, Ramazyan L, Schramm R, Lauenroth V, Paluszkiewicz L, Rojas S . Clinical implications of late-onset right ventricular failure after implantation of a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device as bridge to transplantation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021; 60(1):177-185. DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezab114. View

2.
Grunig E, Tiede H, Enyimayew E, Ehlken N, Seyfarth H, Bossone E . Assessment and prognostic relevance of right ventricular contractile reserve in patients with severe pulmonary hypertension. Circulation. 2013; 128(18):2005-15. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.001573. View

3.
Cameli M, Loiacono F, Sparla S, Solari M, Iardino E, Mandoli G . Systematic Left Ventricular Assist Device Implant Eligibility with Non-Invasive Assessment: The SIENA Protocol. J Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2017; 25(2):39-46. PMC: 5526884. DOI: 10.4250/jcu.2017.25.2.39. View

4.
Dufendach K, Zhu T, Castrillon C, Hong Y, Countouris M, Hickey G . Pre-implant right ventricular free wall strain predicts post-LVAD right heart failure. J Card Surg. 2021; 36(6):1996-2003. DOI: 10.1111/jocs.15479. View

5.
Nieminen M, Buerke M, Cohen-Solal A, Costa S, Edes I, Erlikh A . The role of levosimendan in acute heart failure complicating acute coronary syndrome: A review and expert consensus opinion. Int J Cardiol. 2016; 218:150-157. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.05.009. View