» Articles » PMID: 28842052

Polyp Detection at Colonoscopy: Endoscopist and Technical Factors

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2017 Aug 27
PMID 28842052
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The adenoma detection rate (ADR) has emerged as the most important quality measure in colonoscopy, as it predicts the risk of interval cancer after colonoscopy. Measuring and improving ADR is the central focus of the current quality movement in colonoscopy. High ADRs can be achieved by a colonoscopist with a thorough understanding of the wide range of endoscopic appearances of precancerous lesions in the colorectum, effective bowel preparation, and meticulous technique using high definition colonoscopes. The knowledgeable and effective examiner needs no adjunctive devices or techniques to achieve master level ADRs. However, measurement reveals that many colonoscopists have ADRs that are below recommended minimum thresholds or below master levels. These colonoscopists, and even master level performers, can choose from a variety of adjunctive tools to improve ADR. This review describes these tools according to whether they are non-device methods (e.g. double right colon examination, patient position change, water exchange), mucosal exposure devices (wide angle colonoscopy, fold flattening devices), and lesion highlighting techniques (e.g. chromoendoscopy, electronic chromoendoscopy).

Citing Articles

Water-assisted colonoscopy in inflammatory bowel diseases: From technical implications to diagnostic and therapeutic potentials.

Pellegrino R, Palladino G, Izzo M, De Costanzo I, Landa F, Federico A World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2024; 16(12):647-660.

PMID: 39735395 PMC: 11669963. DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v16.i12.647.


The impact of endoscopist performance and patient factors on distal adenoma detection and colorectal cancer incidence.

Power S, Wooldrage K, Saunders B, Cross A BMC Gastroenterol. 2024; 24(1):44.

PMID: 38262960 PMC: 10804571. DOI: 10.1186/s12876-024-03125-x.


The Relationship Between Colonoscopy Practice Style, Operator Ergonomics and Procedure Quality.

Besler E, Celayir M, Teke E, Akyuz C, Toker S Cureus. 2023; 15(9):e45135.

PMID: 37711268 PMC: 10497800. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.45135.


Improving polyp detection at colonoscopy: Non-technological techniques.

Rajivan R, Thayalasekaran S World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2023; 15(5):354-367.

PMID: 37274557 PMC: 10236979. DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v15.i5.354.


Is There a Difference in Adenoma Detection Rates According to Indication? An Experience in a Panamanian Colorectal Cancer Screening Program.

Zuniga Cisneros J, Tunon C, Adames E, Garcia C, Rivera R, Gonzalez E Gastroenterology Res. 2023; 16(2):96-104.

PMID: 37187549 PMC: 10181342. DOI: 10.14740/gr1599.