» Articles » PMID: 28827646

A Machine Learning Approach Using Survival Statistics to Predict Graft Survival in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Multicenter Cohort Study

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2017 Aug 23
PMID 28827646
Citations 48
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Accurate prediction of graft survival after kidney transplant is limited by the complexity and heterogeneity of risk factors influencing allograft survival. In this study, we applied machine learning methods, in combination with survival statistics, to build new prediction models of graft survival that included immunological factors, as well as known recipient and donor variables. Graft survival was estimated from a retrospective analysis of the data from a multicenter cohort of 3,117 kidney transplant recipients. We evaluated the predictive power of ensemble learning algorithms (survival decision tree, bagging, random forest, and ridge and lasso) and compared outcomes to those of conventional models (decision tree and Cox regression). Using a conventional decision tree model, the 3-month serum creatinine level post-transplant (cut-off, 1.65 mg/dl) predicted a graft failure rate of 77.8% (index of concordance, 0.71). Using a survival decision tree model increased the index of concordance to 0.80, with the episode of acute rejection during the first year post-transplant being associated with a 4.27-fold increase in the risk of graft failure. Our study revealed that early acute rejection in the first year is associated with a substantially increased risk of graft failure. Machine learning methods may provide versatile and feasible tools for forecasting graft survival.

Citing Articles

A novel method to predict white blood cells after kidney transplantation based on machine learning.

He S, Li X, Zhao Z, Li B, Tan X, Guo H Digit Health. 2024; 10:20552076241288107.

PMID: 39484657 PMC: 11526406. DOI: 10.1177/20552076241288107.


A machine learning approach towards assessing consistency and reproducibility: an application to graft survival across three kidney transplantation eras.

Achilonu O, Obaido G, Ogbuokiri B, Aruleba K, Musenge E, Fabian J Front Digit Health. 2024; 6:1427845.

PMID: 39290362 PMC: 11405382. DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1427845.


The Role of Vitamin D Metabolism Genes and Their Genomic Background in Shaping Cyclosporine A Dosage Parameters after Kidney Transplantation.

Kotowska K, Wojciuk B, Sienko J, Bogacz A, Stukan I, Drozdzal S J Clin Med. 2024; 13(16).

PMID: 39201108 PMC: 11355102. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13164966.


Nephrology: a flourishing field with plentiful emerging topics.

Yoo K, Chao C Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 11:1463540.

PMID: 39156691 PMC: 11327083. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1463540.


Predicting graft survival in paediatric kidney transplant recipients using machine learning.

Aksoy G, Akcay H, Ari C, Adar M, Koyun M, Comak E Pediatr Nephrol. 2024; 40(1):203-211.

PMID: 39150523 DOI: 10.1007/s00467-024-06484-5.


References
1.
Lenihan C, Lockridge J, Tan J . A new clinical prediction tool for 5-year kidney transplant outcome. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014; 63(4):549-51. PMC: 4088343. DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.01.004. View

2.
Clayton P, Lim W, Wong G, Chadban S . Relationship between eGFR Decline and Hard Outcomes after Kidney Transplants. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016; 27(11):3440-3446. PMC: 5084878. DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2015050524. View

3.
Koo E, Jang H, Lee J, Park J, Kim S, Kim D . The impact of early and late acute rejection on graft survival in renal transplantation. Kidney Res Clin Pract. 2015; 34(3):160-4. PMC: 4608868. DOI: 10.1016/j.krcp.2015.06.003. View

4.
Krikov S, Khan A, Baird B, Barenbaum L, Leviatov A, Koford J . Predicting kidney transplant survival using tree-based modeling. ASAIO J. 2007; 53(5):592-600. DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0b013e318145b9f7. View

5.
Furness P, Kazi J, Levesley J, Taub N, Nicholson M . A neural network approach to the diagnosis of early acute allograft rejection. Transplant Proc. 2000; 31(8):3151. DOI: 10.1016/s0041-1345(99)00762-9. View