» Articles » PMID: 28809057

Understanding Frames: A UK Survey of Parents and Professionals Regarding the Use of Standing Frames for Children with Cerebral Palsy

Overview
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 2017 Aug 16
PMID 28809057
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Standing frames are used for children with cerebral palsy (CP). They may improve body structure and function (e.g., reducing risk of hip subluxation, and improving bladder and bowel function), improving activity (e.g., motor abilities) and participation (e.g., interaction with peers), but there is little evidence that they do. We aimed to identify current UK standing frame practice for children with CP and to understand stakeholder views regarding their clinical benefits and challenges to use.

Method: Three populations were sampled: clinicians prescribing standing frames for children with CP (n = 305), professionals (health and education) working with children with CP who use standing frames (n = 155), and parents of children with CP who have used standing frames (n = 91). Questionnaires were developed by the co-applicant group and piloted with other professionals and parents of children with CP. They were distributed online via clinical and parent networks across the UK.

Results: Prescribing practice was consistent, but achieving the prescribed use was not always possible. Respondents in all groups reported the perceived benefits of frames, which include many domains of the International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health for Children and Youth. Challenges of use are related to physical space and child-reported pain.

Conclusions: These survey findings provide information from key stakeholders regarding current UK standing frame practice.

Citing Articles

Supported Standing and Supported Stepping Devices for Children with Non-Ambulant Cerebral Palsy: An Interdependence and F-Words Focus.

Paleg G, Williams S, Livingstone R Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024; 21(6).

PMID: 38928915 PMC: 11203597. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21060669.


Health Parameters in Standing and Nonstanding Nonambulatory Adults With Cerebral Palsy.

Murphy K, Gueron L, McMillin C, Marben K Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2021; 3(2):100110.

PMID: 34179748 PMC: 8212004. DOI: 10.1016/j.arrct.2021.100110.


Effect of assisted walking-movement in patients with genetic and acquired neuromuscular disorders with the motorised Innowalk device: an international case study meta-analysis.

Schmidt-Lucke C, Kaferle J, Rydh Berner B, Ahlborg L, Hansen H, Skjellvik Tollefsen U PeerJ. 2019; 7:e7098.

PMID: 31249736 PMC: 6587941. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.7098.


Understanding frames: A UK survey of parents and professionals regarding the use of standing frames for children with cerebral palsy.

Goodwin J, Colver A, Basu A, Crombie S, Howel D, Parr J Child Care Health Dev. 2017; 44(2):195-202.

PMID: 28809057 PMC: 5811781. DOI: 10.1111/cch.12505.

References
1.
Fehlings D, Switzer L, Agarwal P, Wong C, Sochett E, Stevenson R . Informing evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for children with cerebral palsy at risk of osteoporosis: a systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011; 54(2):106-16. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2011.04091.x. View

2.
Huang I, Sugden D, Beveridge S . Assistive devices and cerebral palsy: factors influencing the use of assistive devices at home by children with cerebral palsy. Child Care Health Dev. 2008; 35(1):130-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2008.00898.x. View

3.
Ben-Shlomo Y, Kuh D . A life course approach to chronic disease epidemiology: conceptual models, empirical challenges and interdisciplinary perspectives. Int J Epidemiol. 2002; 31(2):285-93. View

4.
Noronha J, Bundy A, Groll J . The effect of positioning on the hand function of boys with cerebral palsy. Am J Occup Ther. 1989; 43(8):507-12. DOI: 10.5014/ajot.43.8.507. View

5.
Rosenbaum P, Paneth N, Leviton A, Goldstein M, Bax M, Damiano D . A report: the definition and classification of cerebral palsy April 2006. Dev Med Child Neurol Suppl. 2007; 109:8-14. View