Are Physically Frail Older Persons More at Risk of Adverse Outcomes if They Also Suffer from Cognitive, Social, and Psychological Frailty?

Overview

Journal Eur J Ageing

Publisher Springer

Specialty Geriatrics

Date 2017 Aug 15

PMID 28804327

Citations 17

Authors

Bart H L Ament

Marjolein E de Vugt

Frans R J Verhey

Gertrudis I J M Kempen

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Frailty is considered a predictor for negative outcomes such as disability, decreased quality of life, and hospital admission. Frailty measures have been developed that include different dimensions. We examined whether people who are physically frail are more at risk for negative outcomes of frailty if they also suffer from psychological, cognitive, or social frailty. Frailty was measured at baseline by means of the Groningen Frailty Indicator (GFI), which comprises a physical, cognitive, social, and psychological dimension. Only frail persons were included in the study (GFI ≥ 5) that, in addition, had to be frail in the physical dimension (i.e., ≥1 on this dimension). IADL disability and quality of life were measured at baseline and at 12 months. Hospital admission was assessed during this period. In this, physically frail sample effects of the other three frailty dimensions were studied in regression models. The sample ( = 334, mean age 78.1, and range 70-92) included 40.1 % frail men and 59.9 % frail women. Overall, no additional effects for the cognitive, social, or psychosocial dimensions were found: other frailty dimensions did not have an additional impact on disability, quality of life, or hospital admission in people who already suffered from physical frailty. Higher scores of physical frailty were significantly related to IADL disability ( < 0.05) and hospital admission ( < 0.05). Additional analysis showed that the physical frailty score predicted IADL disability and hospital admission better than the GFI overall score. Results of this study suggest that persons, who are physically frail, according to the GFI, are not more at risk for negative outcomes of frailty (i.e., IADL disability, decreased quality of life, and hospital admission) if they in addition suffer from cognitive, social, or psychological frailty. In addition, for the prediction of IADL disability or hospital admission, the focus for screening should be on the physical frailty score instead of the GFI overall score including different dimensions.

Citing Articles

The association of multidimensional frailty with metabolic syndrome and low-grade inflammation in community-dwelling older adults in the Netherlands: a Lifelines cohort study.

Sealy M, van Vliet I, Jager-Wittenaar H, Navis G, Zhu Y Immun Ageing. 2024; 21(1):78.

PMID: 39538284 PMC: 11558828. DOI: 10.1186/s12979-024-00484-7.

Interventions that have potential to help older adults living with social frailty: a systematic scoping review.

Kastner M, Herrington I, Makarski J, Amog K, Bain T, Evangelista V BMC Geriatr. 2024; 24(1):521.

PMID: 38879489 PMC: 11179268. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-024-05096-w.

An observational analysis of frailty in combination with loneliness or social isolation and their association with socioeconomic deprivation, hospitalisation and mortality among UK Biobank participants.

Politis M, Crawford L, Jani B, Nicholl B, Lewsey J, McAllister D Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):7258.

PMID: 38538751 PMC: 10973409. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-57366-7.

Social frailty as a predictor of all-cause mortality and functional disability: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Goto T, Kishimoto T, Fujiwara S, Shirayama Y, Ichikawa T Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):3410.

PMID: 38341512 PMC: 10858956. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-53984-3.

Case management for integrated care of older people with frailty in community settings.

Sadler E, Khadjesari Z, Ziemann A, Sheehan K, Whitney J, Wilson D Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023; 5:CD013088.

PMID: 37218645 PMC: 10204122. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013088.pub2.

References

Slaets J . Vulnerability in the elderly: frailty. Med Clin North Am. 2006; 90(4):593-601. DOI: 10.1016/j.mcna.2006.05.008. View

Gobbens R, Luijkx K, Wijnen-Sponselee M, Schols J . [Frail elderly. Identification of a population at risk]. Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr. 2007; 38(2):65-76. View

Markle-Reid M, Browne G . Conceptualizations of frailty in relation to older adults. J Adv Nurs. 2003; 44(1):58-68. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02767.x. View

Raphael D, Cava M, Brown I, Renwick R, Heathcote K, Weir N . Frailty: a public health perspective. Can J Public Health. 1995; 86(4):224-7. View

Bilotta C, Bowling A, Case A, Nicolini P, Mauri S, Castelli M . Dimensions and correlates of quality of life according to frailty status: a cross-sectional study on community-dwelling older adults referred to an outpatient geriatric service in Italy. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010; 8:56. PMC: 2889875. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-8-56. View

Fried L, Tangen C, Walston J, Newman A, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J . Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001; 56(3):M146-56. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/56.3.m146. View

Metzelthin S, Daniels R, van Rossum E, de Witte L, van den Heuvel W, Kempen G . The psychometric properties of three self-report screening instruments for identifying frail older people in the community. BMC Public Health. 2010; 10:176. PMC: 2868816. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-176. View

Rockwood K, Fox R, Stolee P, Robertson D, Beattie B . Frailty in elderly people: an evolving concept. CMAJ. 1994; 150(4):489-95. PMC: 1486322. View

van den Brink M, van den Hout W, Stiggelbout A, van de Velde C, Kievit J . Cost measurement in economic evaluations of health care: whom to ask?. Med Care. 2004; 42(8):740-6. DOI: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000132351.78009.a1. View

10.

Strawbridge W, Shema S, Balfour J, Higby H, Kaplan G . Antecedents of frailty over three decades in an older cohort. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 1998; 53(1):S9-16. DOI: 10.1093/geronb/53b.1.s9. View

11.

King J, Yourman L, Ahalt C, Eng C, Knight S, Perez-Stable E . Quality of life in late-life disability: "I don't feel bitter because I am in a wheelchair". J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012; 60(3):569-76. PMC: 3619719. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03844.x. View

12.

Bowling A . Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality. J Public Health (Oxf). 2005; 27(3):281-91. DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdi031. View

13.

Daniels R, van Rossum E, Beurskens A, van den Heuvel W, de Witte L . The predictive validity of three self-report screening instruments for identifying frail older people in the community. BMC Public Health. 2012; 12:69. PMC: 3293057. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-69. View

14.

Mitnitski A, Mogilner A, Rockwood K . Accumulation of deficits as a proxy measure of aging. ScientificWorldJournal. 2003; 1:323-36. PMC: 6084020. DOI: 10.1100/tsw.2001.58. View

15.

Gobbens R, van Assen M, Luijkx K, Wijnen-Sponselee M, Schols J . The Tilburg Frailty Indicator: psychometric properties. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2010; 11(5):344-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2009.11.003. View

16.

Buchner D, Wagner E . Preventing frail health. Clin Geriatr Med. 1992; 8(1):1-17. View

17.

Covinsky K, Palmer R, Counsell S, Pine Z, Walter L, Chren M . Functional status before hospitalization in acutely ill older adults: validity and clinical importance of retrospective reports. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000; 48(2):164-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb03907.x. View

18.

Schuurmans H, Steverink N, Lindenberg S, Frieswijk N, Slaets J . Old or frail: what tells us more?. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2004; 59(9):M962-5. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/59.9.m962. View

19.

Fried L, Ferrucci L, Darer J, Williamson J, Anderson G . Untangling the concepts of disability, frailty, and comorbidity: implications for improved targeting and care. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2004; 59(3):255-63. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/59.3.m255. View

20.

Hebert R, Bravo G, Korner-Bitensky N, Voyer L . Refusal and information bias associated with postal questionnaires and face-to-face interviews in very elderly subjects. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996; 49(3):373-81. DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(95)00527-7. View