» Articles » PMID: 20511102

The Tilburg Frailty Indicator: Psychometric Properties

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2010 Jun 1
PMID 20511102
Citations 358
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To assess the reliability, construct validity, and predictive (concurrent) validity of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI), a self-report questionnaire for measuring frailty in older persons.

Design: Cross-sectional.

Setting: Community-based.

Participants: Two representative samples of community-dwelling persons aged 75 years and older (n = 245; n = 234).

Measurements: The TFI was validated using the LASA Physical Activity Questionnaire, BMI, Timed Up & Go test, Four test balance scale, Grip strength test, Shortened Fatigue Questionnaire, Mini-Mental State Examination, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, Anxiety subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Mastery Scale, Loneliness Scale, and the Social Support List. Adverse outcomes were measured using the Groningen Activity Restriction Scale and questions regarding health care use. Quality of life was measured using the WHOQOL-BREF.

Results: The test-retest reliability of the TFI was good: 0.79 for frailty, and from 0.67 to 0.78 for its domains for a 1-year time interval. The 15 single components, and the frailty domains (physical, psychological, social) of the TFI correlated as expected with validated measures, demonstrating both convergent and divergent construct validity of the TFI. The predictive validity of the TFI and its physical domain was good for quality of life and the adverse outcomes disability and receiving personal care, nursing, and informal care.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates that the psychometric properties of the TFI are good, when performed in 2 samples of community-dwelling older people. The results regarding the TFI's validity provide strong evidence for an integral definition of frailty consisting of physical, psychological, and social domains.

Citing Articles

The Biological Rationale for Integrating Intrinsic Capacity Into Frailty Models.

Yu Z, Lozupone M, Chen J, Bao Z, Ruan Q, Panza F Clin Interv Aging. 2025; 20:273-286.

PMID: 40060276 PMC: 11890019. DOI: 10.2147/CIA.S509990.


State of the Art in Measuring Frailty in Patients With Heart Failure: from Diagnosis to Advanced Heart Failure.

Uchmanowicz I, Lisiak M, Lomper K, Czapla M, Kurpas D, Jedrzejczyk M Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2025; 22(1):11.

PMID: 40056318 PMC: 11890372. DOI: 10.1007/s11897-025-00699-9.


Sleep disorders and the association with frailty among community-dwelling older adults in Northwest China: a cross-sectional study.

Yu X, Wang D, Yao L, Shi Z, Liu X, Wu H BMJ Open. 2025; 15(2):e088030.

PMID: 40021193 PMC: 11873331. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088030.


Development of a psychological frailty index: results from the China health and retirement longitudinal study.

Zhao J, Liu J, Fernandez D, Tyrovolas S Front Psychol. 2025; 16:1495733.

PMID: 40008339 PMC: 11850362. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1495733.


The relationship between psychological distress and frailty in stroke patients: the mediating effect of depression.

Li Y, Chen X, Hu D, Peng X, Wang J BMC Psychol. 2025; 13(1):159.

PMID: 39994713 PMC: 11849192. DOI: 10.1186/s40359-025-02454-0.