» Articles » PMID: 28803421

Quantitative Coronary Plaque Analysis Predicts High-risk Plaque Morphology on Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography: Results from the ROMICAT II Trial

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Radiology
Date 2017 Aug 14
PMID 28803421
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Semi-automated software can provide quantitative assessment of atherosclerotic plaques on coronary CT angiography (CTA). The relationship between established qualitative high-risk plaque features and quantitative plaque measurements has not been studied. We analyzed the association between quantitative plaque measurements and qualitative high-risk plaque features on coronary CTA. We included 260 patients with plaque who underwent coronary CTA in the Rule Out Myocardial Infarction/Ischemia Using Computer Assisted Tomography (ROMICAT) II trial. Quantitative plaque assessment and qualitative plaque characterization were performed on a per coronary segment basis. Quantitative coronary plaque measurements included plaque volume, plaque burden, remodeling index, and diameter stenosis. In qualitative analysis, high-risk plaque was present if positive remodeling, low CT attenuation plaque, napkin-ring sign or spotty calcium were detected. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the association between quantitative and qualitative high-risk plaque assessment. Among 888 segments with coronary plaque, high-risk plaque was present in 391 (44.0%) segments by qualitative analysis. In quantitative analysis, segments with high-risk plaque had higher total plaque volume, low CT attenuation plaque volume, plaque burden and remodeling index. Quantitatively assessed low CT attenuation plaque volume (odds ratio 1.12 per 1 mm, 95% CI 1.04-1.21), positive remodeling (odds ratio 1.25 per 0.1, 95% CI 1.10-1.41) and plaque burden (odds ratio 1.53 per 0.1, 95% CI 1.08-2.16) were associated with high-risk plaque. Quantitative coronary plaque characteristics (low CT attenuation plaque volume, positive remodeling and plaque burden) measured by semi-automated software correlated with qualitative assessment of high-risk plaque features.

Citing Articles

High-Risk Plaque Characteristics in Patients with Suspected Stable Coronary Artery Disease and Impaired Glucose Tolerance: A Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Study.

Andersen T, Overgaard K, Heinsen L, Mohamed R, Madsen F, Precht H J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2025; 12(2).

PMID: 39997471 PMC: 11856177. DOI: 10.3390/jcdd12020037.


Whys and Wherefores of Coronary Arterial Positive Remodeling.

Onnis C, Virmani R, Madra A, Nardi V, Salgado R, Montisci R Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2024; 44(12):2416-2427.

PMID: 39479766 PMC: 11594009. DOI: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.124.321504.


Artificial Intelligence-based Coronary Stenosis Quantification at Coronary CT Angiography versus Quantitative Coronary Angiography.

Dundas J, Leipsic J, Sellers S, Blanke P, Miranda P, Ng N Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2024; 5(6):e230124.

PMID: 38166336 PMC: 11163244. DOI: 10.1148/ryct.230124.


Non-Calcified Coronary Artery Plaque on Coronary Computed Tomography Angiogram: Prevalence and Significance.

Alyami B, Santer M, Seetharam K, Velu D, Gadde E, Patel B Tomography. 2023; 9(5):1755-1771.

PMID: 37736993 PMC: 10514817. DOI: 10.3390/tomography9050140.


Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography: Beyond Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease.

Tonet E, Boccadoro A, Micillo M, Cocco M, Cossu A, Pompei G Life (Basel). 2023; 13(5).

PMID: 37240730 PMC: 10223586. DOI: 10.3390/life13051086.


References
1.
Davies M . The composition of coronary-artery plaques. N Engl J Med. 1997; 336(18):1312-4. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199705013361809. View

2.
Maurovich-Horvat P, Ferencik M, Voros S, Merkely B, Hoffmann U . Comprehensive plaque assessment by coronary CT angiography. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2014; 11(7):390-402. DOI: 10.1038/nrcardio.2014.60. View

3.
Brodoefel H, Burgstahler C, Sabir A, Yam C, Khosa F, Claussen C . Coronary plaque quantification by voxel analysis: dual-source MDCT angiography versus intravascular sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009; 192(3):W84-9. PMC: 3290996. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.08.1381. View

4.
Versteylen M, Kietselaer B, Dagnelie P, Joosen I, Dedic A, Raaijmakers R . Additive value of semiautomated quantification of coronary artery disease using cardiac computed tomographic angiography to predict future acute coronary syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 61(22):2296-305. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.02.065. View

5.
Burke A, Weber D, Kolodgie F, Farb A, Taylor A, Virmani R . Pathophysiology of calcium deposition in coronary arteries. Herz. 2001; 26(4):239-44. DOI: 10.1007/pl00002026. View