Computed Tomography-based High-risk Coronary Plaque Score to Predict Acute Coronary Syndrome Among Patients with Acute Chest Pain--Results from the ROMICAT II Trial
Overview
Radiology
Authors
Affiliations
Background: Coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) can be used to detect and quantitatively assess high-risk plaque features.
Objective: To validate the ROMICAT score, which was derived using semi-automated quantitative measurements of high-risk plaque features, for the prediction of ACS.
Material And Methods: We performed quantitative plaque analysis in 260 patients who presented to the emergency department with suspected ACS in the ROMICAT II trial. The readers used a semi-automated software (QAngio, Medis medical imaging systems BV) to measure high-risk plaque features (volume of <60HU plaque, remodeling index, spotty calcium, plaque length) and diameter stenosis in all plaques. We calculated a ROMICAT score, which was derived from the ROMICAT I study and applied to the ROMICAT II trial. The primary outcome of the study was diagnosis of an ACS during the index hospitalization.
Results: Patient characteristics (age 57 ± 8 vs. 56 ± 8 years, cardiovascular risk factors) were not different between those with and without ACS (prevalence of ACS 7.8%). There were more men in the ACS group (84% vs. 59%, p = 0.005). When applying the ROMICAT score derived from the ROMICAT I trial to the patient population of the ROMICAT II trial, the ROMICAT score (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.4-6.0, p = 0.003) was a predictor of ACS after adjusting for gender and ≥ 50% stenosis. The AUC of the model containing ROMICAT score, gender, and ≥ 50% stenosis was 0.91 (95% CI 0.86-0.96) and was better than with a model that included only gender and ≥ 50% stenosis (AUC 0.85, 95%CI 0.77-0.92; p = 0.002).
Conclusions: The ROMICAT score derived from semi-automated quantitative measurements of high-risk plaque features was an independent predictor of ACS during the index hospitalization and was incremental to gender and presence of ≥ 50% stenosis.
Alven J, Petersen R, Hagerman D, Sandstedt M, Kitslaar P, Bergstrom G Eur Radiol. 2025; .
PMID: 39909898 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-025-11410-w.
van Rosendael S, Shiyovich A, Cardoso R, Souza Freire C, van Rosendael A, Lin F J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2024; 3(11):102230.
PMID: 39649823 PMC: 11624369. DOI: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.102230.
Ihdayhid A, Sehly A, He A, Joyner J, Flack J, Konstantopoulos J JACC Adv. 2024; 3(9):100861.
PMID: 39372456 PMC: 11450949. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.100861.
A novel deep learning model for a computed tomography diagnosis of coronary plaque erosion.
Park S, Yuki H, Niida T, Suzuki K, Kinoshita D, McNulty I Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):22992.
PMID: 38151502 PMC: 10752868. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-50483-9.
Cardiac Computed Tomography Angiography in CAD Risk Stratification and Revascularization Planning.
Mehta C, Naeem A, Patel Y Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(18).
PMID: 37761268 PMC: 10530183. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13182902.