» Articles » PMID: 28800346

How Should a Virtual Agent Present Psychoeducation? Influence of Verbal and Textual Presentation on Adherence

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2017 Aug 12
PMID 28800346
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Objective: With the rise of autonomous e-mental health applications, virtual agents can play a major role in improving trustworthiness, therapy outcome and adherence. In these applications, it is important that patients adhere in the sense that they perform the tasks, but also that they adhere to the specific recommendations on how to do them well. One important construct in improving adherence is psychoeducation, information on the why and how of therapeutic interventions. In an e-mental health context, this can be delivered in two different ways: verbally by a (virtual) embodied conversational agent or just via text on the screen. The aim of this research is to study which presentation mode is preferable for improving adherence.

Methods: This study takes the approach of evaluating a specific part of a therapy, namely psychoeducation. This was done in a non-clinical sample, to first test the general constructs of the human-computer interaction. We performed an experimental study on the effect of presentation mode of psychoeducation on adherence. In this study, we took into account the moderating effects of attitude towards the virtual agent and recollection of the information. Within the paradigm of expressive writing, we asked participants (n= 46) to pick one of their worst memories to describe in a digital diary after receiving verbal or textual psychoeducation.

Results And Conclusion: We found that both the attitude towards the virtual agent and how well the psychoeducation was recollected were positively related to adherence in the form of task execution. Moreover, after controlling for the attitude to the agent and recollection, presentation of psychoeducation via text resulted in higher adherence than verbal presentation by the virtual agent did.

Citing Articles

A Novel Smartphone-Based Intervention Aimed at Increasing Future Orientation via the Future Self: a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of a Prototype Application.

Mertens E, Siezenga A, van der Schalk J, van Gelder J Prev Sci. 2023; 25(2):392-405.

PMID: 37976010 PMC: 10891224. DOI: 10.1007/s11121-023-01609-y.


Technologies in Home-Based Digital Rehabilitation: Scoping Review.

Arntz A, Weber F, Handgraaf M, Lalla K, Korniloff K, Murtonen K JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2023; 10:e43615.

PMID: 37253381 PMC: 10415951. DOI: 10.2196/43615.


Investigating the Role of Context in the Delivery of Text Messages for Supporting Psychological Wellbeing.

Bhattacharjee A, Williams J, Meyerhoff J, Kumar H, Mariakakis A, Kornfield R Proc SIGCHI Conf Hum Factor Comput Syst. 2023; 2023.

PMID: 37223844 PMC: 10201989. DOI: 10.1145/3544548.3580774.


: Translating Mental Health Principles into Real Life Through Story-Based Text Messages.

Bhattacharjee A, Williams J, Chou K, Tomlinson J, Meyerhoff J, Mariakakis A Proc ACM Hum Comput Interact. 2023; 6(CSCW2).

PMID: 36816014 PMC: 9933887. DOI: 10.1145/3555123.


A relational agent for treating substance use in adults: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial with a psychoeducational comparator.

Prochaska J, Vogel E, Chieng A, Baiocchi M, Pajarito S, Pirner M Contemp Clin Trials. 2023; 127:107125.

PMID: 36813084 PMC: 10065942. DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2023.107125.


References
1.
Zhang M, Cheow E, Ho C, Ng B, Ho R, Soon Cheok C . Application of low-cost methodologies for mobile phone app development. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2014; 2(4):e55. PMC: 4275474. DOI: 10.2196/mhealth.3549. View

2.
Cartreine J, Ahern D, Locke S . A roadmap to computer-based psychotherapy in the United States. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2010; 18(2):80-95. DOI: 10.3109/10673221003707702. View

3.
Tielman M, Neerincx M, van Meggelen M, Franken I, Brinkman W . How should a virtual agent present psychoeducation? Influence of verbal and textual presentation on adherence. Technol Health Care. 2017; 25(6):1081-1096. PMC: 5814660. DOI: 10.3233/THC-170899. View

4.
Pennebaker J, Beall S . Confronting a traumatic event: toward an understanding of inhibition and disease. J Abnorm Psychol. 1986; 95(3):274-81. DOI: 10.1037//0021-843x.95.3.274. View

5.
Murphy J, Shevlin M, Houston J, Adamson G . A population based analysis of subclinical psychosis and help-seeking behavior. Schizophr Bull. 2010; 38(2):360-7. PMC: 3283148. DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbq092. View