» Articles » PMID: 28785906

Comparison of 3D Plate and Locking Plate in Treatment of Mandibular Fracture-a Clinical Study

Overview
Date 2017 Aug 9
PMID 28785906
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and post-operative complication of 3-dimensional (3D) titanium miniplate and locking plate in mandibular fractures (parasymphysis, symphysis, body, and angle).

Materials And Methods: Forty patients, with non-comminuted mandibular fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation using 3D titanium miniplate system or locking plate system through an intra-oral approach, were included in this study. All patients were systematically monitored up to 2 months post-operatively. Parameters recorded were infection, occlusal discrepancies, hardware failure, wound dehiscence, sensory disturbance of the inferior alveolar nerve, and stability of fractured segments.

Results: Forty patients with mandibular fracture were divided into two groups randomly without any bias. The fractures of all 40 patients were found to be adequately fixed when checked intra-operatively after fixation. One patient (2.5%) of the 3D plate group developed an infection on the first and second post-operative visit and was treated by antibiotic coverage. One patient in the locking plate group (2.5%) reported wound dehiscence after the first week follow-up.

Conclusion: Both 3D titanium miniplates and locking plate are effective in the treatment of mandibular fractures, and overall complication rates are lesser. However, the 3D plating system uses less hardware in cases of parasymphysis and symphysis fractures and more hardware in cases of body and angle fractures.

Citing Articles

Complications following miniplate insertion in maxillofacial fractures: a systematic review.

Sejati B, Kusumaatmaja A, Widiastuti M, Haniastuti T F1000Res. 2025; 13:1507.

PMID: 40028448 PMC: 11869201. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.159017.2.


Management of mandibular angle and body fractures using miniplates and 3D plates.

Balani A, Saroj P, Kharsan V, Karan A, Mazhar H, Awasthy A Bioinformation. 2024; 20(6):605-609.

PMID: 39131529 PMC: 11312315. DOI: 10.6026/973206300200605.


Effect of Joint Use of External Minifixator and Titanium Lockplate on Total Active Motion Range and Hand Function Recovery in Comminuted Metacarpal and Phalanx Fracture Patients.

Li Y, Zhang H J Healthc Eng. 2022; 2022:3566364.

PMID: 35126920 PMC: 8808207. DOI: 10.1155/2022/3566364.


Comparative study of outcomes between locking plates and three-dimensional plates in mandibular fractures.

Amjad S, Kalim Ansari M, Ahmad S, Rahman T Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2021; 11(2):263-269.

PMID: 33897192 PMC: 8051647. DOI: 10.4103/njms.NJMS_53_19.


Treatment of Mandible Fractures Using a Miniplate System: A Retrospective Analysis.

Bohner L, Beiglboeck F, Schwipper S, Lustosa R, Pieirna Marino Segura C, Kleinheinz J J Clin Med. 2020; 9(9).

PMID: 32927782 PMC: 7565660. DOI: 10.3390/jcm9092922.

References
1.
Sauerbier S, Kuenz J, Hauptmann S, Hoogendijk C, Liebehenschel N, Schon R . Clinical aspects of a 2.0-mm locking plate system for mandibular fracture surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2010; 38(7):501-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2010.01.001. View

2.
Singh V, Kumar I, Bhagol A . Comparative evaluation of 2.0-mm locking plate system vs 2.0-mm nonlocking plate system for mandibular fracture: a prospective randomized study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011; 40(4):372-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2010.11.012. View

3.
Zix J, Lieger O, Iizuka T . Use of straight and curved 3-dimensional titanium miniplates for fracture fixation at the mandibular angle. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007; 65(9):1758-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2007.03.013. View

4.
Bui P, Demian N, Beetar P . Infection rate in mandibular angle fractures treated with a 2.0-mm 8-hole curved strut plate. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009; 67(4):804-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.08.034. View

5.
Alpert B, Gutwald R, Schmelzeisen R . New innovations in craniomaxillofacial fixation: the 2.0 lock system. Keio J Med. 2003; 52(2):120-7. DOI: 10.2302/kjm.52.120. View