» Articles » PMID: 28772104

The Role of the Lateral Intraparietal Area in (the Study Of) Decision Making

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2017 Aug 4
PMID 28772104
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Over the past two decades, neurophysiological responses in the lateral intraparietal area (LIP) have received extensive study for insight into decision making. In a parallel manner, inferred cognitive processes have enriched interpretations of LIP activity. Because of this bidirectional interplay between physiology and cognition, LIP has served as fertile ground for developing quantitative models that link neural activity with decision making. These models stand as some of the most important frameworks for linking brain and mind, and they are now mature enough to be evaluated in finer detail and integrated with other lines of investigation of LIP function. Here, we focus on the relationship between LIP responses and known sensory and motor events in perceptual decision-making tasks, as assessed by correlative and causal methods. The resulting sensorimotor-focused approach offers an account of LIP activity as a multiplexed amalgam of sensory, cognitive, and motor-related activity, with a complex and often indirect relationship to decision processes. Our data-driven focus on multiplexing (and de-multiplexing) of various response components can complement decision-focused models and provides more detailed insight into how neural signals might relate to cognitive processes such as decision making.

Citing Articles

The geometry of the neural state space of decisions.

Monsalve-Mercado M, Stine G, Shadlen M, Miller K bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39896602 PMC: 11785246. DOI: 10.1101/2025.01.24.634806.


The neural network RTNet exhibits the signatures of human perceptual decision-making.

Rafiei F, Shekhar M, Rahnev D Nat Hum Behav. 2024; 8(9):1752-1770.

PMID: 38997452 DOI: 10.1038/s41562-024-01914-8.


Neuronal activity in posterior parietal cortex area LIP is not sufficient for saccadic eye movement production.

Brunamonti E, Pare M Front Integr Neurosci. 2023; 17:1251431.

PMID: 38076390 PMC: 10710236. DOI: 10.3389/fnint.2023.1251431.


Different roles of response covariability and its attentional modulation in the sensory cortex and posterior parietal cortex.

Jiang Y, He S, Zhang J Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023; 120(42):e2216942120.

PMID: 37812698 PMC: 10589615. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2216942120.


Pathway and directional specificity of Hebbian plasticity in the cortical visual motion processing network.

Bevilacqua M, Huxlin K, Hummel F, Raffin E iScience. 2023; 26(7):107064.

PMID: 37408682 PMC: 10319215. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107064.


References
1.
Murasugi C, Salzman C, Newsome W . Microstimulation in visual area MT: effects of varying pulse amplitude and frequency. J Neurosci. 1993; 13(4):1719-29. PMC: 6576737. View

2.
Brunton B, Botvinick M, Brody C . Rats and humans can optimally accumulate evidence for decision-making. Science. 2013; 340(6128):95-8. DOI: 10.1126/science.1233912. View

3.
Basso M, WURTZ R . Modulation of neuronal activity in superior colliculus by changes in target probability. J Neurosci. 1998; 18(18):7519-34. PMC: 6793246. View

4.
Kim J, Shadlen M . Neural correlates of a decision in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex of the macaque. Nat Neurosci. 1999; 2(2):176-85. DOI: 10.1038/5739. View

5.
Goldman-Rakic P . Cellular basis of working memory. Neuron. 1995; 14(3):477-85. DOI: 10.1016/0896-6273(95)90304-6. View