Microstimulation of Macaque Area LIP Affects Decision-making in a Motion Discrimination Task

Overview

Journal Nat Neurosci

Date 2006 Apr 11

PMID 16604069

Citations 173

Authors

Timothy D Hanks

Jochen Ditterich

Michael N Shadlen

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

A central goal of cognitive neuroscience is to elucidate the neural mechanisms underlying decision-making. Recent physiological studies suggest that neurons in association areas may be involved in this process. To test this, we measured the effects of electrical microstimulation in the lateral intraparietal area (LIP) while monkeys performed a reaction-time motion discrimination task with a saccadic response. In each experiment, we identified a cluster of LIP cells with overlapping response fields (RFs) and sustained activity during memory-guided saccades. Microstimulation of this cluster caused an increase in the proportion of choices toward the RF of the stimulated neurons. Choices toward the stimulated RF were faster with microstimulation, while choices in the opposite direction were slower. Microstimulation never directly evoked saccades, nor did it change reaction times in a simple saccade task. These results demonstrate that the discharge of LIP neurons is causally related to decision formation in the discrimination task.

Citing Articles

Reduced latency in manual interception with anticipatory smooth eye movements.

Miyamoto T, Numasawa K, Hirano R, Yoshimura Y, Ono S iScience. 2025; 28(2):111849.

PMID: 39967873 PMC: 11834127. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.111849.

Neural Mechanisms Underlying Robust Target Selection in Response to Microstimulation of the Oculomotor System.

Rakhshan M, Schafer R, Moore T, Soltani A J Neurosci. 2024; 45(3.

PMID: 39516041 PMC: 11735662. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2356-23.2024.

The subthalamic nucleus contributes causally to perceptual decision-making in monkeys.

Branam K, Gold J, Ding L Elife. 2024; 13.

PMID: 39311685 PMC: 11419670. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.98345.

Neural basis of concurrent deliberation toward a choice and degree of confidence.

Vivar-Lazo M, Fetsch C bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39149300 PMC: 11326179. DOI: 10.1101/2024.08.06.606833.

The right posterior parietal cortex mediates spatial reorienting of attentional choice bias.

Sengupta A, Banerjee S, Ganesh S, Grover S, Sridharan D Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):6938.

PMID: 39138185 PMC: 11322534. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-51283-z.

References

Thier P, Andersen R . Electrical microstimulation distinguishes distinct saccade-related areas in the posterior parietal cortex. J Neurophysiol. 1998; 80(4):1713-35. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1998.80.4.1713. View

Gold J, Shadlen M . Neural computations that underlie decisions about sensory stimuli. Trends Cogn Sci. 2001; 5(1):10-16. DOI: 10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01567-9. View

Carello C, Krauzlis R . Manipulating intent: evidence for a causal role of the superior colliculus in target selection. Neuron. 2004; 43(4):575-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.07.026. View

Pare M, WURTZ R . Progression in neuronal processing for saccadic eye movements from parietal cortex area lip to superior colliculus. J Neurophysiol. 2001; 85(6):2545-62. DOI: 10.1152/jn.2001.85.6.2545. View

Butovas S, Schwarz C . Spatiotemporal effects of microstimulation in rat neocortex: a parametric study using multielectrode recordings. J Neurophysiol. 2003; 90(5):3024-39. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00245.2003. View

Leon M, Shadlen M . Representation of time by neurons in the posterior parietal cortex of the macaque. Neuron. 2003; 38(2):317-27. DOI: 10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00185-5. View

Van Essen D, Drury H, Dickson J, Harwell J, Hanlon D, Anderson C . An integrated software suite for surface-based analyses of cerebral cortex. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2001; 8(5):443-59. PMC: 131042. DOI: 10.1136/jamia.2001.0080443. View

Bisley J, Zaksas D, Pasternak T . Microstimulation of cortical area MT affects performance on a visual working memory task. J Neurophysiol. 2001; 85(1):187-96. DOI: 10.1152/jn.2001.85.1.187. View

Palmer J, Huk A, Shadlen M . The effect of stimulus strength on the speed and accuracy of a perceptual decision. J Vis. 2005; 5(5):376-404. DOI: 10.1167/5.5.1. View

10.

Ratcliff R, Smith P . A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time. Psychol Rev. 2004; 111(2):333-67. PMC: 1440925. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.111.2.333. View

11.

Salzman C, Murasugi C, Britten K, Newsome W . Microstimulation in visual area MT: effects on direction discrimination performance. J Neurosci. 1992; 12(6):2331-55. PMC: 6575906. View

12.

Pasternak T, Merigan W . Motion perception following lesions of the superior temporal sulcus in the monkey. Cereb Cortex. 1994; 4(3):247-59. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/4.3.247. View

13.

Colby C, Goldberg M . Space and attention in parietal cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1999; 22:319-49. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.22.1.319. View

14.

Britten K, Shadlen M, Newsome W, Movshon J . The analysis of visual motion: a comparison of neuronal and psychophysical performance. J Neurosci. 1992; 12(12):4745-65. PMC: 6575768. View

15.

Wardak C, Olivier E, Duhamel J . A deficit in covert attention after parietal cortex inactivation in the monkey. Neuron. 2004; 42(3):501-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0896-6273(04)00185-0. View

16.

Gold J, Shadlen M . The influence of behavioral context on the representation of a perceptual decision in developing oculomotor commands. J Neurosci. 2003; 23(2):632-51. PMC: 6741872. View

17.

Opris I, Barborica A, Ferrera V . Effects of electrical microstimulation in monkey frontal eye field on saccades to remembered targets. Vision Res. 2005; 45(27):3414-29. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.03.014. View

18.

Andersen R, Buneo C . Intentional maps in posterior parietal cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2002; 25:189-220. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.25.112701.142922. View

19.

Burman D, Bruce C . Suppression of task-related saccades by electrical stimulation in the primate's frontal eye field. J Neurophysiol. 1997; 77(5):2252-67. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1997.77.5.2252. View

20.

Bisley J, Goldberg M . Neuronal activity in the lateral intraparietal area and spatial attention. Science. 2003; 299(5603):81-6. DOI: 10.1126/science.1077395. View