How Clinical Practitioners Assess Frailty in Their Daily Practice: an International Survey

Overview

Journal Aging Clin Exp Res

Publisher Springer

Specialty Geriatrics

Date 2017 Aug 4

PMID 28770478

Citations 36

Authors

Olivier Bruyere

Fanny Buckinx

Charlotte Beaudart

Jean-Yves Reginster

Juergen Bauer

Tommy Cederholm

Antonio Cherubini

Cyrus Cooper

Alfonso Jose Cruz-Jentoft

Francesco Landi

Stefania Maggi

Rene Rizzoli

Avan Aihie Sayer

Cornel Sieber

Bruno Vellas

Matteo Cesari

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: Various operational definitions have been proposed to assess the frailty condition among older individuals. Our objective was to assess how practitioners measure the geriatric syndrome of frailty in their daily routine.

Methods: An online survey was sent to national geriatric societies affiliated to the European Union Geriatric Medicine Society (EUGMS) and to members of the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO).

Results: A total of 388 clinicians from 44 countries answered to the survey. Most of them were medical doctors (93%), and their primary field of practice was geriatrics (83%). Two hundred and five clinicians (52.8%) always assessed frailty in their daily practice, 38.1% reported to "sometimes" measure it, and 9.1% never assess it. A substantial proportion of clinicians (64.9%) diagnose frailty using more than one instrument. The most widely used tool was the gait speed test, adopted by 43.8% of the clinicians, followed by clinical frailty scale (34.3%), the SPPB test (30.2%), the frailty phenotype (26.8%) and the frailty index (16.8%).

Conclusion: A variety of tools is used to assess frailty of older patients in clinical practice highlighting the need for standardisation and guidelines.

Citing Articles

Quantitative biomechanical analysis in validating a video-based model to remotely assess physical frailty: a potential solution to telehealth and globalized remote-patient monitoring.

Dehghan Rouzi M, Lee M, Beom J, Bidadi S, Ouattas A, Cay G Biomed Eng Lett. 2024; 14(6):1365-1375.

PMID: 39465102 PMC: 11502621. DOI: 10.1007/s13534-024-00410-2.

Association of Dietary Patterns, Suspected Sarcopenia, and Frailty Syndrome among Older Adults in Poland-A Cross-Sectional Study.

Gajda R, Jezewska-Zychowicz M, Raczkowska E, Rak K, Szymala-Pedzik M, Noculak L Nutrients. 2024; 16(18).

PMID: 39339690 PMC: 11434646. DOI: 10.3390/nu16183090.

Frailty assessment in critically ill older adults: a narrative review.

Moisi L, Mino J, Guidet B, Vallet H Ann Intensive Care. 2024; 14(1):93.

PMID: 38888743 PMC: 11189387. DOI: 10.1186/s13613-024-01315-0.

Development of a minimum clinical dataset for preoperative comprehensive geriatric assessment using a modified Delphi technique.

Lodge M, Aitken R, Chong Y, Thillainadesan J Australas J Ageing. 2024; 43(4):733-739.

PMID: 38754868 PMC: 11671713. DOI: 10.1111/ajag.13334.

Which Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) instruments are currently used in Germany: a survey.

Kudelka J, Ollenschlager M, Dodel R, Eskofier B, Hobert M, Jahn K BMC Geriatr. 2024; 24(1):347.

PMID: 38627620 PMC: 11022468. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-024-04913-6.

References

Dartigues J, Amieva H . Cognitive frailty: rational and definition from an (I.a.N.a./i.a.g.g.) international consensus group. J Nutr Health Aging. 2014; 18(1):95. DOI: 10.1007/s12603-013-0437-5. View

Theou O, Cann L, Blodgett J, Wallace L, Brothers T, Rockwood K . Modifications to the frailty phenotype criteria: Systematic review of the current literature and investigation of 262 frailty phenotypes in the Survey of Health, Ageing, and Retirement in Europe. Ageing Res Rev. 2015; 21:78-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.arr.2015.04.001. View

Fried L, Tangen C, Walston J, Newman A, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J . Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001; 56(3):M146-56. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/56.3.m146. View

Demougeot L, Abellan van Kan G, Vellas B, de Souto Barreto P . Frailty Detection with the Gérontopôle Frailty Screening Tool (GFST). J Frailty Aging. 2016; 2(3):150-2. DOI: 10.14283/jfa.2013.22. View

Strawbridge W, Shema S, Balfour J, Higby H, Kaplan G . Antecedents of frailty over three decades in an older cohort. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 1998; 53(1):S9-16. DOI: 10.1093/geronb/53b.1.s9. View

Apostolo J, Cooke R, Bobrowicz-Campos E, Santana S, Marcucci M, Cano A . Predicting risk and outcomes for frail older adults: a protocol for an umbrella review of available frailty screening tools. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016; 13(12):14-24. DOI: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2468. View

Romero-Ortuno R, Walsh C, Lawlor B, Kenny R . A frailty instrument for primary care: findings from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE). BMC Geriatr. 2010; 10:57. PMC: 2939541. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2318-10-57. View

Cesari M, Marzetti E, Calvani R, Vellas B, Bernabei R, Bordes P . The need of operational paradigms for frailty in older persons: the SPRINTT project. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2017; 29(1):3-10. DOI: 10.1007/s40520-016-0712-5. View

Malmstrom T, Morley J . Frailty and cognition: linking two common syndromes in older persons. J Nutr Health Aging. 2013; 17(9):723-5. DOI: 10.1007/s12603-013-0395-y. View

10.

Baitar A, Van Fraeyenhove F, Vandebroek A, De Droogh E, Galdermans D, Mebis J . Evaluation of the Groningen Frailty Indicator and the G8 questionnaire as screening tools for frailty in older patients with cancer. J Geriatr Oncol. 2013; 4(1):32-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2012.08.001. View

11.

Gray W, Richardson J, McGuire J, Dewhurst F, Elder V, Weeks J . Frailty Screening in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016; 64(4):806-23. DOI: 10.1111/jgs.14069. View

12.

Kelaiditi E, Cesari M, Canevelli M, Abellan van Kan G, Ousset P, Gillette-Guyonnet S . Cognitive frailty: rational and definition from an (I.A.N.A./I.A.G.G.) international consensus group. J Nutr Health Aging. 2013; 17(9):726-34. DOI: 10.1007/s12603-013-0367-2. View

13.

Gobbens R, van Assen M, Luijkx K, Wijnen-Sponselee M, Schols J . The Tilburg Frailty Indicator: psychometric properties. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2010; 11(5):344-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2009.11.003. View

14.

Cesari M, Nobili A, Vitale G . Frailty and sarcopenia: From theory to clinical implementation and public health relevance. Eur J Intern Med. 2016; 35:1-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2016.07.021. View

15.

Shimada H, Makizako H, Doi T, Yoshida D, Tsutsumimoto K, Anan Y . Combined prevalence of frailty and mild cognitive impairment in a population of elderly Japanese people. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013; 14(7):518-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2013.03.010. View

16.

Cruz-Jentoft A, Baeyens J, Bauer J, Boirie Y, Cederholm T, Landi F . Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis: Report of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. Age Ageing. 2010; 39(4):412-23. PMC: 2886201. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afq034. View

17.

Cesari M, Gambassi G, Abellan Van Kan G, Vellas B . The frailty phenotype and the frailty index: different instruments for different purposes. Age Ageing. 2013; 43(1):10-2. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/aft160. View

18.

Fried L, Ferrucci L, Darer J, Williamson J, Anderson G . Untangling the concepts of disability, frailty, and comorbidity: implications for improved targeting and care. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2004; 59(3):255-63. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/59.3.m255. View

19.

Buckinx F, Rolland Y, Reginster J, Ricour C, Petermans J, Bruyere O . Burden of frailty in the elderly population: perspectives for a public health challenge. Arch Public Health. 2015; 73(1):19. PMC: 4392630. DOI: 10.1186/s13690-015-0068-x. View

20.

Malmstrom T, Morley J . The frail brain. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013; 14(7):453-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2013.04.010. View