» Articles » PMID: 28752950

Cell Protrusion and Retraction Driven by Fluctuations in Actin Polymerization: A Two-dimensional Model

Overview
Specialty Cell Biology
Date 2017 Jul 29
PMID 28752950
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Animal cells that spread onto a surface often rely on actin-rich lamellipodial extensions to execute protrusion. Many cell types recently adhered on a two-dimensional substrate exhibit protrusion and retraction of their lamellipodia, even though the cell is not translating. Travelling waves of protrusion have also been observed, similar to those observed in crawling cells. These regular patterns of protrusion and retraction allow quantitative analysis for comparison to mathematical models. The periodic fluctuations in leading edge position of XTC cells have been linked to excitable actin dynamics using a one-dimensional model of actin dynamics, as a function of arc-length along the cell. In this work we extend this earlier model of actin dynamics into two dimensions (along the arc-length and radial directions of the cell) and include a model membrane that protrudes and retracts in response to the changing number of free barbed ends of actin filaments near the membrane. We show that if the polymerization rate at the barbed ends changes in response to changes in their local concentration at the leading edge and/or the opposing force from the cell membrane, the model can reproduce the patterns of membrane protrusion and retraction seen in experiment. We investigate both Brownian ratchet and switch-like force-velocity relationships between the membrane load forces and actin polymerization rate. The switch-like polymerization dynamics recover the observed patterns of protrusion and retraction as well as the fluctuations in F-actin concentration profiles. The model generates predictions for the behavior of cells after local membrane tension perturbations.

Citing Articles

Pushing boundaries: mechanisms enabling bacterial pathogens to spread between cells.

Raab J, Hamilton D, Harju T, Huynh T, Russo B Infect Immun. 2024; 92(9):e0052423.

PMID: 38661369 PMC: 11385730. DOI: 10.1128/iai.00524-23.


Nascent adhesions shorten the period of lamellipodium protrusion through the Brownian ratchet mechanism.

Carney K, Khan A, Stam S, Samson S, Mittal N, Han S Mol Biol Cell. 2023; 34(12):ar115.

PMID: 37672339 PMC: 10846621. DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E23-08-0314.


Understanding the Role of Fibroblasts following a 3D Tumoroid Implantation for Breast Tumor Formation.

Rijal G Bioengineering (Basel). 2021; 8(11).

PMID: 34821729 PMC: 8615023. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering8110163.


Discrete mechanical model of lamellipodial actin network implements molecular clutch mechanism and generates arcs and microspikes.

Rutkowski D, Vavylonis D PLoS Comput Biol. 2021; 17(10):e1009506.

PMID: 34662335 PMC: 8553091. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009506.


WAVE1 and WAVE2 have distinct and overlapping roles in controlling actin assembly at the leading edge.

Tang Q, Schaks M, Koundinya N, Yang C, Pollard L, Svitkina T Mol Biol Cell. 2020; 31(20):2168-2178.

PMID: 32697617 PMC: 7550694. DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E19-12-0705.


References
1.
Peskin C, Odell G, Oster G . Cellular motions and thermal fluctuations: the Brownian ratchet. Biophys J. 1993; 65(1):316-24. PMC: 1225726. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(93)81035-X. View

2.
Yamashiro S, Mizuno H, Smith M, Ryan G, Kiuchi T, Vavylonis D . New single-molecule speckle microscopy reveals modification of the retrograde actin flow by focal adhesions at nanometer scales. Mol Biol Cell. 2014; 25(7):1010-24. PMC: 3967967. DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E13-03-0162. View

3.
Welf E, Johnson H, Haugh J . Bidirectional coupling between integrin-mediated signaling and actomyosin mechanics explains matrix-dependent intermittency of leading-edge motility. Mol Biol Cell. 2013; 24(24):3945-55. PMC: 3861089. DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E13-06-0311. View

4.
Smith M, Kiuchi T, Watanabe N, Vavylonis D . Distributed actin turnover in the lamellipodium and FRAP kinetics. Biophys J. 2013; 104(1):247-57. PMC: 3540247. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2012.11.3819. View

5.
Moure A, Gomez H . Computational model for amoeboid motion: Coupling membrane and cytosol dynamics. Phys Rev E. 2016; 94(4-1):042423. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.94.042423. View