» Articles » PMID: 28741903

The Acceptability and Validity of Self-collected Nasal Swabs for Detection of Influenza Virus Infection Among Older Adults in Thailand

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2017 Jul 26
PMID 28741903
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Self-collection of nasal swabs could improve the timeliness of influenza virus detection in older adults.

Objectives: Measure the acceptability, adequacy, timeliness, and validity of self-collected nasal swabs among adults >65 years in Thailand.

Methods: Our evaluation consisted of two parts: a one-month study among randomly selected, community-dwelling older adults to simulate community-based surveillance for acute respiratory infections (ARI); and a clinic study of older adults with ARI to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of self-collected nasal swabs for influenza virus infection compared with healthcare worker (HCW)-collected nasal and nasopharyngeal swabs.

Results: In the community study, 24% of participants experienced an ARI during the observation period. All (100%) participants with an ARI self-collected nasal swabs within 72 hours of symptom onset of which 92% were considered adequate samples. In the clinic study, 45% of patients with ARI presented within 72 hours of symptom onset. The sensitivity of self-collected nasal swabs for detection of influenza virus infection was 78% (95% CI 40-97) compared to nasopharyngeal and 88% (95% CI 47-100) compared to nasal swabs collected by HCWs. Specificity was 100% (95% CI 97-100) compared to both methods. Self-collection of nasal swabs was found acceptable by 99% of participants in both studies.

Conclusions: Self-collection of nasal swabs was acceptable to older adults in Thailand who were able to take adequate samples. Self-collection of nasal swabs may improve the timeliness of sample collection but lower sensitivity will need to be considered.

Citing Articles

Influenza vaccine hesitancy among healthcare workers in a Northeastern province in Thailand: Findings of a cross-sectional survey.

Shrestha M, Sherer P, Paek S, Prasert K, Chawalchitiporn S, Praphasiri P PLoS One. 2024; 19(9):e0310761.

PMID: 39298526 PMC: 11412645. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310761.


Impact of Swabbing Location, Self-Swabbing, and Food Intake on SARS-CoV-2 RNA Detection.

Drager S, Bruni F, Bernasconi M, Hammann-Hanni A, Jirasko V, Tanno A Microorganisms. 2024; 12(3).

PMID: 38543642 PMC: 10976265. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms12030591.


Pandemic driven innovation: A pilot evaluation of an alternative respiratory pathogen collection device.

Nguyen T, Zeger W, Wadman M, Schnaubelt A, Barksdale A Am J Emerg Med. 2022; 61:111-116.

PMID: 36087464 PMC: 9423874. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.08.047.


Sensitivity and Specificity of SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Detection Tests Using Oral, Anterior Nasal, and Nasopharyngeal Swabs: a Diagnostic Accuracy Study.

Wolfl-Duchek M, Bergmann F, Jorda A, Weber M, Muller M, Seitz T Microbiol Spectr. 2022; 10(1):e0202921.

PMID: 35107327 PMC: 8809344. DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.02029-21.


Evaluation of the Practicability of Biosynex Antigen Self-Test COVID-19 AG+ for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid Protein from Self-Collected Nasal Mid-Turbinate Secretions in the General Public in France.

Tonen-Wolyec S, Dupont R, Awaida N, Batina-Agasa S, Hayette M, Belec L Diagnostics (Basel). 2021; 11(12).

PMID: 34943454 PMC: 8700066. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11122217.


References
1.
Dhiman N, Miller R, Finley J, Sztajnkrycer M, Nestler D, Boggust A . Effectiveness of patient-collected swabs for influenza testing. Mayo Clin Proc. 2012; 87(6):548-54. PMC: 3538476. DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2012.02.011. View

2.
Dawood F, Prapasiri P, Areerat P, Ruayajin A, Chittaganpitch M, Muangchana C . Effectiveness of the 2010 and 2011 Southern Hemisphere trivalent inactivated influenza vaccines against hospitalization with influenza-associated acute respiratory infection among Thai adults aged ≥ 50 years. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2014; 8(4):463-8. PMC: 4181806. DOI: 10.1111/irv.12233. View

3.
Irving S, Vandermause M, Shay D, Belongia E . Comparison of nasal and nasopharyngeal swabs for influenza detection in adults. Clin Med Res. 2012; 10(4):215-8. PMC: 3494547. DOI: 10.3121/cmr.2012.1084. View

4.
Akmatov M, Gatzemeier A, Schughart K, Pessler F . Equivalence of self- and staff-collected nasal swabs for the detection of viral respiratory pathogens. PLoS One. 2012; 7(11):e48508. PMC: 3498275. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048508. View

5.
Goyal S, Prasert K, Praphasiri P, Chittaganpitch M, Waicharoen S, Ditsungnoen D . The acceptability and validity of self-collected nasal swabs for detection of influenza virus infection among older adults in Thailand. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2017; 11(5):412-417. PMC: 5596524. DOI: 10.1111/irv.12471. View