» Articles » PMID: 28730345

Does Fear Beget Fear? Risk-mediated Habitat Selection Triggers Predator Avoidance at Lower Trophic Levels

Overview
Journal Oecologia
Date 2017 Jul 22
PMID 28730345
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Non-consumptive effects (NCEs) of predators are ubiquitous in food webs with well-detailed impacts on trophic cascades over multiple levels. However, integrating NCEs with other predator-mediated interactions, like intraguild predation, as well as context-specific habitat factors that shape top-down pressure, remains a challenge. Focusing on two common seed predators, mice (Peromyscus spp.) and carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae), we quantify trophic and behavioral consequences of predation risk and availability of refuge vegetation on both intraguild predators (mice) and intraguild prey (beetles). In a 2-year field experiment, we manipulated refuge habitat (red clover), small mammal access, and moonlight, which small mammals use as an indirect cue of predation risk. We found that avoidance of predation risk by mice in simulated moonlight reduced carabid activity density in vegetation by up to 50% compared to exposed habitat, but had no cascading effects on seed predation. We linked patterns observed in the field with behavioral mechanisms by observing beetle foraging activity, and found that exposure to both indirect and direct vertebrate predator cues reduced movement by 50%, consistent with predator-mediated activity reductions observed in the field. However, predation risk increased carabid seed consumption by 43%. Thus, weak effects of predation risk on seed removal in the field may be explained by overcompensatory seed feeding by beetles. This work demonstrates that predators elicit responses that cascade over multiple trophic levels, triggering behavioral changes in species lower on the food chain. These behavior-mediated cascades are controlled by their spatiotemporal context and have important downstream impacts on predator-prey dynamics.

Citing Articles

Insecticides may facilitate the escape of weeds from biological control.

Rowen E, Pearsons K, Smith R, Wickings K, Tooker J PeerJ. 2025; 13():e18597.

PMID: 39822979 PMC: 11737330. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18597.


Insect communities under skyglow: diffuse night-time illuminance induces spatio-temporal shifts in movement and predation.

Dyer A, Ryser R, Brose U, Amyntas A, Bodnar N, Boy T Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023; 378(1892):20220359.

PMID: 37899019 PMC: 10613549. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0359.


Connected Carabids: Network Interactions and Their Impact on Biocontrol by Carabid Beetles.

De Heij S, Willenborg C Bioscience. 2020; 70(6):490-500.

PMID: 32536691 PMC: 7277018. DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biaa039.

References
1.
Janssen A, Sabelis M, Magalhaes S, Montserrat M, van der Hammen T . Habitat structure affects intraguild predation. Ecology. 2007; 88(11):2713-9. DOI: 10.1890/06-1408.1. View

2.
Schmidt J, Rypstra A . Opportunistic predator prefers habitat complexity that exposes prey while reducing cannibalism and intraguild encounters. Oecologia. 2010; 164(4):899-910. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-010-1785-z. View

3.
Prasad R, Snyder W . Diverse trait-mediated interactions in a multi-predator, multi-prey community. Ecology. 2006; 87(5):1131-7. DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[1131:dtiiam]2.0.co;2. View

4.
Bricker M, Pearson D, Maron J . Small-mammal seed predation limits the recruitment and abundance of two perennial grassland forbs. Ecology. 2010; 91(1):85-92. DOI: 10.1890/08-1773.1. View

5.
Polis G, Holt R . Intraguild predation: The dynamics of complex trophic interactions. Trends Ecol Evol. 2011; 7(5):151-4. DOI: 10.1016/0169-5347(92)90208-S. View