» Articles » PMID: 23750040

Integration of Multiple Cues Allows Threat-sensitive Anti-intraguild Predator Responses in Predatory Mites

Overview
Journal Behaviour
Specialty Biology
Date 2013 Jun 11
PMID 23750040
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Intraguild (IG) prey is commonly confronted with multiple IG predator species. However, the IG predation (IGP) risk for prey is not only dependent on the predator species, but also on inherent (intraspecific) characteristics of a given IG predator such as its life-stage, sex or gravidity and the associated prey needs. Thus, IG prey should have evolved the ability to integrate multiple IG predator cues, which should allow both inter- and intraspecific threat-sensitive anti-predator responses. Using a guild of plant-inhabiting predatory mites sharing spider mites as prey, we evaluated the effects of single and combined cues (eggs and/or chemical traces left by a predator female on the substrate) of the low risk IG predator and the high risk IG predator on time, distance and path shape parameters of the larval IG prey . IG prey discriminated between traces of the low and high risk IG predator, with and without additional presence of their eggs, indicating interspecific threat-sensitivity. The behavioural changes were manifest in distance moved, activity and path shape of IG prey. The cue combination of traces and eggs of the IG predators conveyed other information than each cue alone, allowing intraspecific threat-sensitive responses by IG prey apparent in changed velocities and distances moved. We argue that graded responses to single and combined IG predator cues are adaptive due to minimization of acceptance errors in IG prey decision making.

Citing Articles

Microgeographic differentiation in thermal and antipredator responses and their carry-over effects across life stages in a damselfly.

Amer N, Stoks R, Antol A, Sniegula S PLoS One. 2024; 19(2):e0295707.

PMID: 38394143 PMC: 10889876. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295707.


Reproducing during Heat Waves: Influence of Juvenile and Adult Environment on Fecundity of a Pest Mite and Its Predator.

Tscholl T, Nachman G, Spangl B, Serve H, Walzer A Biology (Basel). 2023; 12(4).

PMID: 37106755 PMC: 10136120. DOI: 10.3390/biology12040554.


Does fear beget fear? Risk-mediated habitat selection triggers predator avoidance at lower trophic levels.

Blubaugh C, Widick I, Kaplan I Oecologia. 2017; 185(1):1-11.

PMID: 28730345 DOI: 10.1007/s00442-017-3909-1.


Intraguild interactions among three spider mite predators: predation preference and effects on juvenile development and oviposition.

Rahmani H, Daneshmandi A, Walzer A Exp Appl Acarol. 2015; 67(4):493-505.

PMID: 26462926 DOI: 10.1007/s10493-015-9974-4.


Predation on heterospecific larvae by adult females of Kampimodromus aberrans, Amblyseius andersoni, Typhlodromus pyri and Phytoseius finitimus (Acari: Phytoseiidae).

Ahmad S, Pozzebon A, Duso C Exp Appl Acarol. 2015; 67(1):1-20.

PMID: 26154593 DOI: 10.1007/s10493-015-9940-1.


References
1.
Walzer A, Schausberger P . Sex-specific developmental plasticity of generalist and specialist predatory mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in response to food stress. Biol J Linn Soc Lond. 2011; 102(3):650-660. PMC: 3191859. DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2010.01593.x. View

2.
Rosenheim J, Wilhoit L, Armer C . Influence of intraguild predation among generalist insect predators on the suppression of an herbivore population. Oecologia. 2017; 96(3):439-449. DOI: 10.1007/BF00317517. View

3.
McMurtry J, Croft B . Life-styles of Phytoseiid mites and their roles in biological control. Annu Rev Entomol. 1997; 42:291-321. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ento.42.1.291. View

4.
Walzer A, Schausberger P . Phenotypic plasticity in anti-intraguild predator strategies: mite larvae adjust their behaviours according to vulnerability and predation risk. Exp Appl Acarol. 2012; 60(1):95-115. PMC: 3616216. DOI: 10.1007/s10493-012-9624-z. View

5.
Schausberger P, Croft B . Cannibalism and intraguild predation among phytoseiid mites: are aggressiveness and prey preference related to diet specialization?. Exp Appl Acarol. 2001; 24(9):709-25. DOI: 10.1023/a:1010747208519. View