» Articles » PMID: 28706207

The Influence of Marital Status on Survival of Gallbladder Cancer Patients: a Population-based Study

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2017 Jul 15
PMID 28706207
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Marital status has been found to be a prognostic factor for survival in various cancers, but its role in gallbladder cancer (GBC) has not been fully studied. In this study, we used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER)-registered database to analyze the survival of GBC patients with different marital status. A total of 6,627 GBC patients were selected from SEER database from 2004 to 2013. The age, race, grade, histologic type, AJCC stage, SEER stage and marital status were identified as independent prognostic factors. Married GBC patients had a higher 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) than that of unmarried ones (20.1% v.s. 17.8%, P < 0.05). Subgroup analyses showed that widowed patients had 14.0% less of 5-year CSS compared to married ones of stage I (55.9% v.s. 41.9%, P < 0.05), 14.7% of stage II (15.6% v.s. 10.9%, P < 0.05), and 1.5% of stage III + IV (2.9% v.s. 1.4%, P < 0.05). In addition, single is an independent prognostic factor at stage III + IV (HR = 1.225, 95%CI 1.054-1.423, P = 0.008). These results indicated that widowed patients were at a high risk of cancer-specific mortality and marriage can be a protective prognostic factor in CSS.

Citing Articles

The role of marital status in gallbladder cancer: a real-world competing risk analysis.

Jin H, Du D, Xie Y, Jin H, Tong J, Li B BMC Gastroenterol. 2024; 24(1):276.

PMID: 39164628 PMC: 11334324. DOI: 10.1186/s12876-024-03364-y.


A prognostic nomogram and risk classification system of elderly patients with extraosseous plasmacytoma: a SEER database analysis.

Chen Y, Tang M, Fu Y, Zhuang X, Wei R, Chen Y J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023; 149(20):17921-17931.

PMID: 37955685 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-05492-6.


The association between the volume of the gallbladder based on sonographic findings and demographical data in the PERSIAN Guilan cohort study (PGCS).

Joukar F, Ashoobi M, Alizadeh A, Zeinali T, Faraji N, Tabatabaii M BMC Res Notes. 2023; 16(1):310.

PMID: 37924103 PMC: 10623732. DOI: 10.1186/s13104-023-06582-x.


Epidemiological and survival outcomes of neuroendocrine carcinoma of the breast: a SEER data analysis.

Xia L, Lai J, Liu X, Kong F, Qiu S, Hu H Transl Cancer Res. 2023; 12(8):1951-1962.

PMID: 37701099 PMC: 10493786. DOI: 10.21037/tcr-23-368.


Marital status and survival in cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Krajc K, Mirosevic S, Sajovic J, Ketis Z, Spiegel D, Drevensek G Cancer Med. 2022; 12(2):1685-1708.

PMID: 35789072 PMC: 9883406. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5003.


References
1.
Rendall M, Weden M, Favreault M, Waldron H . The protective effect of marriage for survival: a review and update. Demography. 2011; 48(2):481-506. DOI: 10.1007/s13524-011-0032-5. View

2.
Hu Y, Goldman N . Mortality differentials by marital status: an international comparison. Demography. 1990; 27(2):233-50. View

3.
Mahdi H, Kumar S, Munkarah A, Abdalamir M, Doherty M, Swensen R . Prognostic impact of marital status on survival of women with epithelial ovarian cancer. Psychooncology. 2011; 22(1):83-8. DOI: 10.1002/pon.2058. View

4.
Pup L, Mantovani A, Luce A, Cavaliere C, Facchini G, di Francia R . Endocrine disruptors and female cancer: Informing the patients (Review). Oncol Rep. 2015; 34(1):3-11. DOI: 10.3892/or.2015.3997. View

5.
Hoeijmakers J . DNA damage, aging, and cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009; 361(15):1475-85. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra0804615. View