High-pitch Dual-source CT Angiography Without ECG-gating for Imaging the Whole Aorta: Intraindividual Comparison with Standard Pitch Single-source Technique Without ECG Gating

Overview

Journal Diagn Interv Radiol

Publisher Galenos Publishing House

Date 2017 Jul 14

PMID 28703104

Citations 2

Authors

Carmelinda Manna

Mario Silva

Rocco Cobelli

Sara Poggesi

Cristina Rossi

Nicola Sverzellati

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to perform intraindividual comparison of computed tomography (CT) parameters, image quality, and radiation exposure between standard CT angiography (CTA) and high-pitch dual source (DS)-CTA, in subjects undergoing serial CTA of thoracoabdominal aorta.

Methods: Eighteen subjects with thoracoabdominal CTA by standard technique and high-pitch DS-CTA technique within 6 months of each other were retrieved for intraindividual comparison of image quality in thoracic and abdominal aorta. Quantitative analysis was performed by comparison of mean aortic attenuation, noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Qualitative analysis was performed by visual assessment of motion artifacts and diagnostic confidence. Radiation exposure was quantified by effective dose. Image quality was apportioned to radiation exposure by means of figure of merit.

Results: Mean aortic attenuation and noise were higher in high-pitch DS-CTA of thoracoabdominal aorta, whereas SNR and CNR were similar in thoracic aorta and significantly lower in high-pitch DS-CTA of abdominal aorta (P = 0.024 and P = 0.016). High-pitch DS-CTA was significantly better in the first segment of thoracic aorta. Effective dose was reduced by 72% in high-pitch DS-CTA.

Conclusion: High-pitch DS-CTA without electrocardiography-gating is an effective technique for imaging aorta with very low radiation exposure and with significant reduction of motion artifacts in ascending aorta; however, the overall quality of high-pitch DS-CTA in abdominal aorta is lower than standard CTA.

Citing Articles

Progress of CT aortic angiography combined with coronary artery in the evaluation of acute aortic syndrome.

An H, Xie R, Ge Y, Wang T Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022; 9:1036982.

PMID: 36479572 PMC: 9719981. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1036982.

Optimizing low contrast volume thoracic CT angiography: From the basics to the advanced.

Kaproth-Joslin K, Hobbs S, Rajiah P, Chaturvedi A, Chaturvedi A J Clin Imaging Sci. 2022; 12:41.

PMID: 36128360 PMC: 9479554. DOI: 10.25259/JCIS_51_2022.

References

Karlo C, Leschka S, Goetti R, Feuchtner G, Desbiolles L, Stolzmann P . High-pitch dual-source CT angiography of the aortic valve-aortic root complex without ECG-synchronization. Eur Radiol. 2010; 21(1):205-12. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-010-1907-3. View

Wuest W, Anders K, Schuhbaeck A, May M, Gauss S, Marwan M . Dual source multidetector CT-angiography before Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) using a high-pitch spiral acquisition mode. Eur Radiol. 2011; 22(1):51-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-011-2233-0. View

Geleijns J, Golding S, Menzel H, Schibilla H . A workshop on quality criteria for computed tomography held in Arhus, Denmark, November 1998. Eur Radiol. 2000; 10(3):544-5. DOI: 10.1007/s003300050095. View

Holmquist F, Nyman U . Eighty-peak kilovoltage 16-channel multidetector computed tomography and reduced contrast-medium doses tailored to body weight to diagnose pulmonary embolism in azotaemic patients. Eur Radiol. 2006; 16(5):1165-76. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-005-0117-x. View

Bischoff B, Meinel F, Reiser M, Becker H . Novel single-source high-pitch protocol for CT angiography of the aorta: comparison to high-pitch dual-source protocol in the context of TAVI planning. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013; 29(5):1159-65. DOI: 10.1007/s10554-013-0182-1. View

Schindera S, Nelson R, Mukundan Jr S, Paulson E, Jaffe T, Miller C . Hypervascular liver tumors: low tube voltage, high tube current multi-detector row CT for enhanced detection--phantom study. Radiology. 2007; 246(1):125-32. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2461070307. View

Samei E, Dobbins 3rd J, Lo J, Tornai M . A framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital X-ray imaging. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005; 114(1-3):220-9. DOI: 10.1093/rpd/nch562. View

Geyer L, De Cecco C, Schoepf U, Silverman J, Krazinski A, Bamberg F . Low-volume contrast medium protocol for comprehensive cardiac and aortoiliac CT assessment in the context of transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Acad Radiol. 2015; 22(9):1138-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2015.03.018. View

Christensen J, Seaman D, Lungren M, Hurwitz L, Boll D . Assessment of vascular contrast and wall motion of the aortic root and ascending aorta on MDCT angiography: dual-source high-pitch vs non-gated single-source acquisition schemes. Eur Radiol. 2014; 24(5):990-7. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-014-3120-2. View

10.

Sahani D, Saini S, DSouza R, ONeill M, Prasad S, Kalra M . Comparison between low (3:1) and high (6:1) pitch for routine abdominal/pelvic imaging with multislice computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2003; 27(2):105-9. DOI: 10.1097/00004728-200303000-00001. View

11.

Apfaltrer P, Hanna E, Schoepf U, Spears J, Schoenberg S, Fink C . Radiation dose and image quality at high-pitch CT angiography of the aorta: intraindividual and interindividual comparisons with conventional CT angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012; 199(6):1402-9. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.12.8652. View

12.

Mileto A, Ramirez-Giraldo J, Nelson R, Hurwitz L, Roy Choudhury K, Seaman D . High-Pitch Dual-Source MDCT for Imaging of the Thoracoabdominal Aorta: Relationships Among Radiation Dose, Noise, Pitch, and Body Size in a Phantom Experiment and Clinical Study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015; 205(4):834-9. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.15.14334. View

13.

Schernthaner R, Stadler A, Beitzke D, Homolka P, Weber M, Lammer J . Dose modulated retrospective ECG-gated versus non-gated 64-row CT angiography of the aorta at the same radiation dose: comparison of motion artifacts, diagnostic confidence and signal-to-noise-ratios. Eur J Radiol. 2011; 81(4):e585-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.06.053. View

14.

Zhang L, Li X, Schoepf U, Wichmann J, Xiang Tang C, Zhou C . Non-Electrocardiogram-Triggered 70-kVp High-Pitch Computed Tomography Angiography of the Whole Aorta With Iterative Reconstruction: Initial Results. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2015; 40(1):109-17. DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000329. View

15.

Russo V, Garattoni M, Buia F, Attina D, Lovato L, Zompatori M . 128-slice CT angiography of the aorta without ECG-gating: efficacy of faster gantry rotation time and iterative reconstruction in terms of image quality and radiation dose. Eur Radiol. 2015; 26(2):359-69. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-015-3848-3. View

16.

Flohr T, Leng S, Yu L, Aiimendinger T, Bruder H, Petersilka M . Dual-source spiral CT with pitch up to 3.2 and 75 ms temporal resolution: image reconstruction and assessment of image quality. Med Phys. 2010; 36(12):5641-53. DOI: 10.1118/1.3259739. View

17.

Nakagawa J, Tasaki O, Watanabe Y, Azuma T, Ohnishi M, Ukai I . Reduction of thoracic aorta motion artifact with high-pitch 128-slice dual-source computed tomographic angiography: a historical control study. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2013; 37(5):755-9. DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e31829c3f76. View

18.

Beeres M, Wichmann J, Frellesen C, Bucher A, Albrecht M, Scholtz J . ECG-gated Versus Non-ECG-gated High-pitch Dual-source CT for Whole Body CT Angiography (CTA). Acad Radiol. 2015; 23(2):163-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2015.09.003. View

19.

Beeres M, Schell B, Mastragelopoulos A, Herrmann E, Kerl J, Gruber-Rouh T . High-pitch dual-source CT angiography of the whole aorta without ECG synchronisation: initial experience. Eur Radiol. 2011; 22(1):129-37. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-011-2257-5. View

20.

Bolen M, Popovic Z, Tandon N, Flamm S, Schoenhagen P, Halliburton S . Image quality, contrast enhancement, and radiation dose of ECG-triggered high-pitch CT versus non-ECG-triggered standard-pitch CT of the thoracoabdominal aorta. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012; 198(4):931-8. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.11.6921. View