» Articles » PMID: 28692700

Noise, Multisensory Integration, and Previous Response in Perceptual Disambiguation

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2017 Jul 11
PMID 28692700
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Sensory information about the state of the world is generally ambiguous. Understanding how the nervous system resolves such ambiguities to infer the actual state of the world is a central quest for sensory neuroscience. However, the computational principles of perceptual disambiguation are still poorly understood: What drives perceptual decision-making between multiple equally valid solutions? Here we investigate how humans gather and combine sensory information-within and across modalities-to disambiguate motion perception in an ambiguous audiovisual display, where two moving stimuli could appear as either streaming through, or bouncing off each other. By combining psychophysical classification tasks with reverse correlation analyses, we identified the particular spatiotemporal stimulus patterns that elicit a stream or a bounce percept, respectively. From that, we developed and tested a computational model for uni- and multi-sensory perceptual disambiguation that tightly replicates human performance. Specifically, disambiguation relies on knowledge of prototypical bouncing events that contain characteristic patterns of motion energy in the dynamic visual display. Next, the visual information is linearly integrated with auditory cues and prior knowledge about the history of recent perceptual interpretations. What is more, we demonstrate that perceptual decision-making with ambiguous displays is systematically driven by noise, whose random patterns not only promote alternation, but also provide signal-like information that biases perception in highly predictable fashion.

Citing Articles

Multisensory stimuli facilitate low-level perceptual learning on a difficult global motion task in virtual reality.

Fromm C, Maddox R, Polonenko M, Huxlin K, Diaz G PLoS One. 2025; 20(3):e0319007.

PMID: 40036211 PMC: 11878941. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319007.


Perception of temporal synchrony not a prerequisite for multisensory integration.

Jertberg R, Begeer S, Geurts H, Chakrabarti B, Van der Burg E Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):4982.

PMID: 38424118 PMC: 10904801. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-55572-x.


Spatial and temporal (non)binding of audiovisual rhythms in sensorimotor synchronisation.

Lapenta O, Keller P, Nozaradan S, Varlet M Exp Brain Res. 2023; 241(3):875-887.

PMID: 36788141 PMC: 9985575. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-023-06569-x.


Implicit expectation modulates multisensory perception.

Zeljko M, Grove P, Kritikos A Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022; 84(3):915-925.

PMID: 35233744 PMC: 9001297. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-022-02460-z.


Multisensory Integration as per Technological Advances: A Review.

Cornelio P, Velasco C, Obrist M Front Neurosci. 2021; 15:652611.

PMID: 34239410 PMC: 8257956. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.652611.


References
1.
Grassi M, Casco C . Audiovisual bounce-inducing effect: attention alone does not explain why the discs are bouncing. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009; 35(1):235-43. DOI: 10.1037/a0013031. View

2.
Neri P, Heeger D . Spatiotemporal mechanisms for detecting and identifying image features in human vision. Nat Neurosci. 2002; 5(8):812-6. DOI: 10.1038/nn886. View

3.
Pastukhov A, Braun J . A short-term memory of multi-stable perception. J Vis. 2009; 8(13):7.1-14. DOI: 10.1167/8.13.7. View

4.
Thompson P . Perceived rate of movement depends on contrast. Vision Res. 1982; 22(3):377-80. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(82)90153-5. View

5.
Moreno-Bote R, Rinzel J, Rubin N . Noise-induced alternations in an attractor network model of perceptual bistability. J Neurophysiol. 2007; 98(3):1125-39. PMC: 2702529. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00116.2007. View