» Articles » PMID: 28689940

Carotid Body Tumor Resection: Just As Safe Without Preoperative Embolization

Overview
Journal Ann Vasc Surg
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2017 Jul 11
PMID 28689940
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Carotid body tumors (CBTs) are rare entities for which surgical resection remains the gold standard. Given their hypervascularity, preoperative embolization is often used; however, controversy exists over whether a benefit is associated. Proponents of embolization argue that it minimizes blood loss and complications. Critics argue that cost and stroke outweigh benefits. This study aimed to investigate the impact of embolization on outcomes following CBT resection.

Methods: Patients undergoing CBT resection were identified using the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Database for 5 states between 2006 and 2013. Patients were divided into 2 groups: carotid body tumor resection alone (CBTR) and carotid body tumor resection with preoperative arterial embolization (CBETR). Descriptive statistics were calculated using arithmetic means with standard deviations for continuous variables and proportions for categorical variables. Patients were propensity score matched on the basis of sex, age, race, insurance, and comorbidity prior to analysis. Risk-adjusted odds of mortality, stroke, nerve injury, blood loss, and length of stay (LOS) were calculated using mixed-effects regression models with fixed effects for age, race, sex, and comorbidities.

Results: A total of 547 patients were identified. Of these, 472 patients underwent CBTR and 75 underwent CBETR. Mean age was 54.7 ± 16 years. Mean number of days between embolization and resection was 0.65 ± 0.72 days (range 0-3). When compared with CBTR, there were no significant differences in mortality for CBETR (1.35% vs. 0%, P = 0.316), cranial nerve injury (2.7% vs. 0%, P = 0.48), and blood loss (2.7% vs. 6.8%, P = 0.245). Following risk adjustment, CBETR increased the odds of prolonged LOS (odds ratio 5.3, 95% confidence interval 2.1-13.3).

Conclusions: CBT resection is a relatively rare procedure. The utility of preoperative tumor embolization has been questioned. This study demonstrates no benefit of preoperative tumor embolization.

Citing Articles

Retropharyngeal carotid body tumor: A challenge in terms of surgical technicality.

Ahmadi A, Jahanshahi F, Shafiei A, Naderi D Int J Surg Case Rep. 2024; 126():110672.

PMID: 39616742 PMC: 11648258. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2024.110672.


The effect of preoperative embolization rate on surgical outcomes for carotid paraganglioma resection.

Yildirim M, Yildirim H, Dogan Y Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2024; 70(8):e20240371.

PMID: 39166682 PMC: 11329243. DOI: 10.1590/1806-9282.20240371.


Preoperative Embolization in Surgical Resection of Cervical Paragangliomas: Usefulness and Current Evidence.

Rajendran S, Yadev I, Sreekumar R Cureus. 2023; 15(11):e48278.

PMID: 38058316 PMC: 10695852. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.48278.


Multidisciplinary care improves outcomes for patients with carotid body paragangliomas-The UCLA experience.

Wong K, Tam K, Tran E, Sajed D, St John M Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2023; 8(5):1203-1209.

PMID: 37899866 PMC: 10601546. DOI: 10.1002/lio2.1130.


Carotid Body Tumors: Institutional Experience of 10 Cases and a Review of Literature.

Nayak A, Parida P, Aswathi K, Preetam C, Pradhan P, Samal D Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023; 75(2):1282-1289.

PMID: 37275006 PMC: 10234938. DOI: 10.1007/s12070-022-03226-7.


References
1.
Patetsios P, Gable D, Garrett W, Lamont J, Kuhn J, Shutze W . Management of carotid body paragangliomas and review of a 30-year experience. Ann Vasc Surg. 2002; 16(3):331-8. DOI: 10.1007/s10016-001-0106-8. View

2.
Power A, Bower T, Kasperbauer J, Link M, Oderich G, Cloft H . Impact of preoperative embolization on outcomes of carotid body tumor resections. J Vasc Surg. 2012; 56(4):979-89. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.03.037. View

3.
Sajid M, Hamilton G, BAKER D . A multicenter review of carotid body tumour management. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007; 34(2):127-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2007.01.015. View

4.
Lemon S, Roy J, Clark M, Friedmann P, Rakowski W . Classification and regression tree analysis in public health: methodological review and comparison with logistic regression. Ann Behav Med. 2003; 26(3):172-81. DOI: 10.1207/S15324796ABM2603_02. View

5.
Murphy T, Brackmann D . Effects of preoperative embolization on glomus jugulare tumors. Laryngoscope. 1989; 99(12):1244-7. DOI: 10.1288/00005537-198912000-00007. View