» Articles » PMID: 28679842

The Firing Characteristics of Foot Sole Cutaneous Mechanoreceptor Afferents in Response to Vibration Stimuli

Overview
Journal J Neurophysiol
Specialties Neurology
Physiology
Date 2017 Jul 7
PMID 28679842
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Single unit microneurography was used to record the firing characteristics of the four classes of foot sole cutaneous afferents [fast and slowly adapting type I and II (FAI, FAII, SAI, and SAII)] in response to sinusoidal vibratory stimuli. Frequency (3-250 Hz) and amplitude (0.001-2 mm) combinations were applied to afferent receptive fields through a 6-mm diameter probe. The impulses per cycle, defined as the number of action potentials evoked per vibration sine wave, were measured over 1 s of vibration at each frequency-amplitude combination tested. Afferent entrainment threshold (lowest amplitude at which an afferent could entrain 1:1 to the vibration frequency) and afferent firing threshold (minimum amplitude for which impulses per cycle was greater than zero) were then obtained for each frequency. Increases in vibration frequency are generally associated with decreases in expected impulses per cycle ( < 0.001), but each foot sole afferent class appears uniquely tuned to vibration stimuli. FAII afferents tended to have the lowest entrainment and firing thresholds ( < 0.001 for both); however, these afferents seem to be sensitive across frequency. In contrast to FAII afferents, SAI and SAII afferents tended to demonstrate optimal entrainment to frequencies below 20 Hz and FAI afferents faithfully encoded frequencies between 8 and 60 Hz. Contrary to the selective activation of distinct afferent classes in the hand, application of class-specific frequencies in the foot sole is confounded due to the high sensitivity of FAII afferents. These findings may aid in the development of sensorimotor control models or the design of balance enhancement interventions. Our work provides a mechanistic look at the capacity of foot sole cutaneous afferents to respond to vibration of varying frequency and amplitude. We found that foot sole afferent classes are uniquely tuned to vibration stimuli; however, unlike in the hand, they cannot be independently activated by class-specific frequencies. Viewing the foot sole as a sensory structure, the present findings may aid in the refinement of sensorimotor control models and design of balance enhancement interventions.

Citing Articles

The effects of whole-body vibration therapy on immune and brain functioning: current insights in the underlying cellular and molecular mechanisms.

Ahuja G, Arenales Arauz Y, van Heuvelen M, Kortholt A, Oroszi T, van der Zee E Front Neurol. 2024; 15:1422152.

PMID: 39144715 PMC: 11323691. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1422152.


Enhanced Muscle Activation Using Robotic Assistance Within the Electromechanical Delay: Implications for Rehabilitation?.

Dzewaltowski A, Malcolm P IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2024; 32:2432-2440.

PMID: 38935467 PMC: 11321240. DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2024.3419688.


Influence of Ambient Temperature on Autonomic Nerve Function and Peripheral Sensation from Moderate-Intensity Treadmill Exercise.

Wada S, Mahbub M, Yamaguchi N, Hase R, Tanabe T Int J Exerc Sci. 2024; 17(2):491-503.

PMID: 38665327 PMC: 11042855. DOI: 10.70252/EFCE3145.


Quantifying spatial acuity of frequency resolved midair ultrasound vibrotactile stimuli.

Cataldo A, Frier W, Haggard P Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):21149.

PMID: 38036579 PMC: 10689848. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-48037-0.


Vertical contact forces affect vibration perception in human hairy skin.

Schmidt D, Schlee G, Milani T, Germano A PeerJ. 2023; 11:e15952.

PMID: 37692116 PMC: 10484200. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.15952.


References
1.
Zeger S, Liang K . Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. Biometrics. 1986; 42(1):121-30. View

2.
Johansson R, VALLBO A . Detection of tactile stimuli. Thresholds of afferent units related to psychophysical thresholds in the human hand. J Physiol. 1979; 297(0):405-22. PMC: 1458728. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp013048. View

3.
Johansson R, Landstrom U, Lundstrom R . Responses of mechanoreceptive afferent units in the glabrous skin of the human hand to sinusoidal skin displacements. Brain Res. 1982; 244(1):17-25. DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(82)90899-x. View

4.
Strzalkowski N, Triano J, Lam C, Templeton C, Bent L . Thresholds of skin sensitivity are partially influenced by mechanical properties of the skin on the foot sole. Physiol Rep. 2015; 3(6). PMC: 4510627. DOI: 10.14814/phy2.12425. View

5.
Kekoni J, Hamalainen H, Rautio J, Tukeva T . Mechanical sensibility of the sole of the foot determined with vibratory stimuli of varying frequency. Exp Brain Res. 1989; 78(2):419-24. DOI: 10.1007/BF00228915. View