» Articles » PMID: 11826182

Distribution and Behaviour of Glabrous Cutaneous Receptors in the Human Foot Sole

Overview
Journal J Physiol
Specialty Physiology
Date 2002 Feb 5
PMID 11826182
Citations 85
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To document the activity of cutaneous mechanoreceptors in the glabrous skin of the foot sole, tungsten microelectrodes were inserted through the popliteal fossa and into the tibial nerve of thirteen healthy human subjects. A total of 104 cutaneous mechanoreceptors were identified in the glabrous skin of the foot. This sample consisted of 15 slow adapting type I (14 %), 16 slow adapting type II (15 %), 59 fast adapting type I (57 %), and 14 fast adapting type II units (14 %). The location of the receptors and the outline of the receptive fields were determined by using nylon monofilaments perpendicularly applied against the surface of the skin. This revealed that the receptors were widely distributed without an accumulation of receptors in the toes. There were also larger receptive fields predominantly isolated on the plantar surface of the metatarsal-tarsal region of the foot sole. Furthermore, with the foot in an unloaded position, there was no background discharge activity in any of the cutaneous receptors in the absence of intentionally applied stimulation. These findings suggest that skin receptors in the foot sole behave differently from those receptors found on the glabrous skin of the hand. This may reflect the role of foot sole skin receptors in standing balance and movement control.

Citing Articles

Effect of Vibro-Tactile Stimulation Sequence and Support Surface Inclination on Gait and Balance Measures.

Engsberg C, Hunt N, Barlow S, Mukherjee M Brain Sci. 2025; 15(2).

PMID: 40002471 PMC: 11853359. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci15020138.


Velocity ratings and perceptual qualities of electrotactile stimulation of the foot sole are impacted by direction, stimulus interval, and cutaneous saltation.

Apollinaro M, Bent L Perception. 2025; 54(3):160-179.

PMID: 39887193 PMC: 11869507. DOI: 10.1177/03010066251315053.


Mechanoreceptor sensory feedback is impaired by pressure induced cutaneous ischemia on the human foot sole and can predict cutaneous microvascular reactivity.

Howe E, Apollinaro M, Bent L Front Neurosci. 2024; 18:1329832.

PMID: 38629048 PMC: 11019310. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1329832.


Dynamics of brain-muscle networks reveal effects of age and somatosensory function on gait.

Roeder L, Breakspear M, Kerr G, Boonstra T iScience. 2024; 27(3):109162.

PMID: 38414847 PMC: 10897916. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.109162.


Sex hormone mediated change on flexion reflex.

Soedirdjo S, Chung Y, Dhaher Y Front Neurosci. 2024; 17:1263756.

PMID: 38188036 PMC: 10768023. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1263756.


References
1.
Edin B . Quantitative analysis of static strain sensitivity in human mechanoreceptors from hairy skin. J Neurophysiol. 1992; 67(5):1105-13. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1992.67.5.1105. View

2.
Edin B, Abbs J . Finger movement responses of cutaneous mechanoreceptors in the dorsal skin of the human hand. J Neurophysiol. 1991; 65(3):657-70. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1991.65.3.657. View

3.
Knibestol M . Stimulus-response functions of slowly adapting mechanoreceptors in the human glabrous skin area. J Physiol. 1975; 245(1):63-80. PMC: 1330845. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp010835. View

4.
VALLBO A, HAGBARTH K . Activity from skin mechanoreceptors recorded percutaneously in awake human subjects. Exp Neurol. 1968; 21(3):270-89. DOI: 10.1016/0014-4886(68)90041-1. View

5.
Trulsson M . Mechanoreceptive afferents in the human sural nerve. Exp Brain Res. 2001; 137(1):111-6. DOI: 10.1007/s002210000649. View