» Articles » PMID: 28679448

Simultaneous Integrated Boost Therapy of Carcinoma of the Hypopharynx/larynx with and Without Flattening Filter - a Treatment Planning and Dosimetry Study

Overview
Journal Radiat Oncol
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialties Oncology
Radiology
Date 2017 Jul 7
PMID 28679448
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate if the flattening filter free (FFF) irradiation mode of a linear accelerator (linac) is advantageous as compared to the flat beam (FF) irradiation mode in intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for carcinoma of the hypopharynx / larynx.

Methods: Four treatment plans were created for each of 10 patients for an Elekta Synergy linac with Agility collimating device, a dual arc VMAT and a nine field step and shoot IMRT each with and without flattening filter. Plan quality was compared considering target coverage and dose to the organs at risk. All plans were verified by a 2D-ionization-chamber-array and delivery times were compared. Peripheral point doses were determined as a measure of second cancer risk. The Wilcoxon test was used for statistical analysis with a significance level of 0.05.

Results: Plan quality was similar for all four treatment plans without statistically significant differences of clinical relevance. The clinical goals were met in all plans for the PTV-SIB (V > 95%), the spinal cord (D < 45 Gy) and the brain stem (D < 48 Gy). For the parotids, the goal of D < 30 Gy was met in 70% and 60% of the plans for the left and right parotid respectively, and the V of the SIB reached an average of 94%. Delivery times were similar for FF and FFF and significantly decreased by around 70% for VMAT as compared to IMRT. Peripheral doses were significantly reduced by 18% in FFF mode as compared to FF and by 26% for VMAT as compared to IMRT. Lowest peripheral doses were found for VMAT FFF, followed by VMAT FF.

Conclusions: The FFF mode of a linear accelerator is advantageous for the treatment of hypopharynx/larynx carcinoma only with respect to reduction of second cancer induction in peripheral organs for the combination of Elekta Synergy linacs and Oncentra® External Beam v4.5 treatment planning system. This might be of interest in a therapy with curative intent.

Citing Articles

Comparison of the dose distribution of the VMAT radiotherapy technique depending on the beam used: FFF-X10MV and FFF-X15MV.

Plaza D, Sroka L, Orzechowska K, Slosarek K Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2024; 28(5):654-660.

PMID: 38179296 PMC: 10764046. DOI: 10.5603/rpor.97508.


Feasibility of flattening filter free beams for hippocampal avoidance whole-brain radiotherapy: a dosimetric and radiobiological analysis.

Liu F, Peng Y, Li Q, Zhang Q, Shi H, Qie S Front Oncol. 2023; 13:1290434.

PMID: 38074656 PMC: 10703487. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1290434.


Secondary malignancy risk for patients with localized prostate cancer after intensity-modulated radiotherapy with and without flattening filter.

Treutwein M, Loeschel R, Hipp M, Koelbl O, Dobler B J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2020; 21(12):197-205.

PMID: 33147377 PMC: 7769399. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13088.


The influence of radiotherapy techniques on the plan quality and on the risk of secondary tumors in patients with pituitary adenoma.

Treutwein M, Steger F, Loeschel R, Koelbl O, Dobler B BMC Cancer. 2020; 20(1):88.

PMID: 32013920 PMC: 6998093. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-6535-y.


Outcome and toxicity of intensity-modulated radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost in patients with pharyngo-laryngeal cancer.

Fondevilla Soler A, Lopez-Guerra J, Garcia Fernandez A, Samaniego Conde M, Belmonte Gonzalez M, Praena-Fernandez J Clin Transl Oncol. 2018; 21(7):881-890.

PMID: 30506131 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-018-1995-0.


References
1.
Johnston M, Clifford S, Bromley R, Back M, Oliver L, Eade T . Volumetric-modulated arc therapy in head and neck radiotherapy: a planning comparison using simultaneous integrated boost for nasopharynx and oropharynx carcinoma. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2011; 23(8):503-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2011.02.002. View

2.
Nicolini G, Ghosh-Laskar S, Shrivastava S, Banerjee S, Chaudhary S, Agarwal J . Volumetric modulation arc radiotherapy with flattening filter-free beams compared with static gantry IMRT and 3D conformal radiotherapy for advanced esophageal cancer: a feasibility study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012; 84(2):553-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.12.041. View

3.
Habl G, Potthoff K, Haefner M, Abdollahi A, Hassel J, Boller E . Differentiation of irradiation and cetuximab induced skin reactions in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer undergoing radioimmunotherapy: the HICARE protocol (head and neck cancer: immunochemo and radiotherapy with erbitux) - a.... BMC Cancer. 2013; 13:345. PMC: 3751099. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-345. View

4.
Dobler B, Khemissi A, Obermeier T, Hautmann M, Katsilieri Z, Kolbl O . Re-irradiating spinal column metastases using IMRT and VMAT with and without flattening filter - a treatment planning study. Radiat Oncol. 2016; 11:33. PMC: 4774147. DOI: 10.1186/s13014-016-0603-0. View

5.
Miyazaki M, Nishiyama K, Ueda Y, Ohira S, Tsujii K, Isono M . Preliminary analysis of the sequential simultaneous integrated boost technique for intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancers. J Radiat Res. 2016; 57(4):406-11. PMC: 4973640. DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrw010. View