» Articles » PMID: 28674740

Changes in Gait Pattern and Early Functional Results After ACL Repair Are Comparable to Those of ACL Reconstruction

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Date 2017 Jul 5
PMID 28674740
Citations 29
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Dynamic intraligamentary stabilization (DIS) has been introduced as a new technique to repair the torn anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and to restore knee joint kinematics after an acute ACL tear. Aim of the present study was to compare the early post-operative activity, restoration of gait pattern and functional results after DIS in comparison with primary ACL reconstruction (ACLR) for acute ACL tears. It was hypothesized that functional results, post-operative activity and changes in gait pattern after DIS are comparable to those after ACLR.

Methods: Sixty patients with acute ACL tears were included in this study and underwent either DIS or ACLR with an anatomic semitendinosus autograft in a randomized manner. Patients were equipped with an accelerometric step counter for the first 6 weeks after surgery in order to monitor their early post-operative activity. 3D gait analysis was performed at 6 weeks and 6 months after surgery. Temporal-spatial, kinematic and kinetic parameters were extracted and averaged for each subject. Functional results were recorded at 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months after surgery using the Tegner activity scale, International Knee Documentation Committee score and Lysholm score.

Results: Patients who underwent DIS showed an increased early post-operative activity with significant differences at week 2 and 3 (p = 0.0241 and 0.0220). No significant differences between groups were found for knee kinematic and kinetic parameters or the functional scores at any time of the follow-up. Furthermore, the difference in anterior tibial translation was not significantly different between the two groups (n.s.).

Conclusion: Early functional results and changes in gait pattern after DIS are comparable to those of primary ACLR. Therefore, ACL repair may be an alternative to ACLR in this cohort of patients.

Level Of Evidence: I.

Citing Articles

Successful ACL repair by dynamic intraligamentary stabilisation is non-inferior in functional performance and worse in proprioception compared to healthy controls in a case-matched study.

Gommers S, Farid A, de Groot J, Sierevelt I, Haverkamp D J Exp Orthop. 2024; 11(4):e70047.

PMID: 39463467 PMC: 11512437. DOI: 10.1002/jeo2.70047.


Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair Leads to Improved Patient-Reported Outcomes Compared to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Karlin E, McCann J, Panish B, Geng X, Wei L, Argintar E Cureus. 2024; 16(5):e60693.

PMID: 38903336 PMC: 11187451. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.60693.


Acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture: can repair become an alternative to reconstruction: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and cohort studies.

Opoku M, Fang M, Lu W, Li Y, Xiao W J Orthop Surg Res. 2024; 19(1):331.

PMID: 38825707 PMC: 11145936. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-04812-x.


Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Modern Augmented ACL Repair and Autograft ACL Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Studies With Minimum 2-Year Follow-up.

Ren Y, Wang J, Ji J, Zhang C, Meng Q Orthop J Sports Med. 2024; 12(1):23259671231223743.

PMID: 38282789 PMC: 10812109. DOI: 10.1177/23259671231223743.


Continuous data capture of gait and mobility metrics using wearable devices for postoperative monitoring in common elective orthopaedic procedures of the hip, knee, and spine: a scoping review.

Natarajan P, Fonseka R, Maharaj M, Koinis L, Mobbs R J Orthop Surg Res. 2023; 18(1):812.

PMID: 37907943 PMC: 10617143. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-04303-5.


References
1.
Eggli S, Kohlhof H, Zumstein M, Henle P, Hartel M, Evangelopoulos D . Dynamic intraligamentary stabilization: novel technique for preserving the ruptured ACL. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014; 23(4):1215-21. PMC: 4371814. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-2949-x. View

2.
Paessler H, Deneke J, Dahners L . Augmented repair and early mobilization of acute anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Am J Sports Med. 1992; 20(6):667-74. DOI: 10.1177/036354659202000607. View

3.
Mulligan E, McGuffie D, Coyner K, Khazzam M . The reliability and diagnostic accuracy of assessing the translation endpoint during the lachman test. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2015; 10(1):52-61. PMC: 4325288. View

4.
Webster K, Feller J . Alterations in joint kinematics during walking following hamstring and patellar tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2010; 26(2):175-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.09.011. View

5.
Webster K, Wittwer J, OBrien J, Feller J . Gait patterns after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction are related to graft type. Am J Sports Med. 2005; 33(2):247-54. DOI: 10.1177/0363546504266483. View