» Articles » PMID: 15701611

Gait Patterns After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Are Related to Graft Type

Overview
Journal Am J Sports Med
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2005 Feb 11
PMID 15701611
Citations 39
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Although there is a tendency toward gait normalization after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, altered moments about the knee flexion-extension axis have been reported. It is possible that these gait alterations relate to donor site morbidity associated with the graft harvest.

Hypothesis: There is a relationship between graft type and external knee moments during walking.

Study Design: Controlled laboratory study.

Methods: Three groups were compared: 17 patellar tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction patients (mean, 11 months after surgery), 17 hamstring tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction patients (mean, 9.3 months after surgery), and 17 matched controls. A 3-dimensional motion analysis and force plate system was used to determine sagittal plane kinematics and kinetics of the lower limb during comfortable-speed walking.

Results: There were significant differences in the moments about the knee that related to graft type. The external knee flexion moment at midstance was significantly smaller than that in the control knees in 65% of patients in the patellar tendon group and 29% of patients in the hamstring tendon group. In contrast, the external knee extension moment at terminal stance was significantly smaller than that in the control knees in 53% of subjects in the hamstring tendon group and 23% of subjects in the patellar tendon group.

Conclusions: There are graft-specific differences in knee biomechanics after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction that appear to relate to the donor site.

Clinical Relevance: Considerable debate continues as to whether the patellar tendon or the hamstring tendon graft is preferable for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. It is therefore clinically relevant to understand the biomechanical differences in knee function associated with both graft types.

Citing Articles

Evaluating Gait with Force Sensing Insoles 6 Months after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: An Autograft Comparison.

Cherelstein R, Kuenze C, Harkey M, Walaszek M, Grozier C, Brumfield E Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2024; 57(1):210-216.

PMID: 39283230 PMC: 11649491. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000003554.


Prolonged quadriceps latency during gait early after anterior cruciate ligament injury predicts radiographic knee osteoarthritis 6-years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Ito N, Capin J, Arhos E, Wellsandt E, Pohlig R, Buchanan T Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2024; 117:106301.

PMID: 38945068 PMC: 11250627. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2024.106301.


Time to treat the tendon rupture induced by surgery: early hypertrophy of the patellar tendon graft site predicts strong quadriceps after ACLR with bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft.

Ito N, Sigurdsson H, Snyder-Mackler L, Silbernagel K Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023; 31(12):5791-5798.

PMID: 37934286 PMC: 10842920. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-023-07657-9.


The Influence of Knee Position on Ultrasound Imaging of Femoral Cartilage in Individuals with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Battersby H, Holmes S, Shumski E, Heredia C, Garcia S, Pamukoff D Cartilage. 2023; 15(2):84-93.

PMID: 37846037 PMC: 11368891. DOI: 10.1177/19476035231205682.


Stabilization and Gap Formation of Adjustable Versus Fixed Primary ACL Repair With Internal Brace: An in Vitro Full-Construct Biomechanical Cadaveric Study.

Bachmaier S, Smith P, Hammoud S, Ritter D, Hauck O, Wijdicks C Orthop J Sports Med. 2023; 11(9):23259671231201462.

PMID: 37786477 PMC: 10541754. DOI: 10.1177/23259671231201462.