» Articles » PMID: 28663921

Depth Sensitivity of Frequency Domain Optical Measurements in Diffusive Media

Overview
Specialty Radiology
Date 2017 Jul 1
PMID 28663921
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The depth sensitivity functions for AC amplitude, phase (PH) and DC intensity signals have been obtained in the frequency domain (where the source amplitude is modulated at radio-frequencies) by making use of analytical solutions of the photon diffusion equation in an infinite slab geometry. Furthermore, solutions for the relative contrast of AC, PH and DC signals when a totally absorbing plane is placed at a fixed depth of the slab have also been obtained. The solutions have been validated by comparisons with gold standard Monte Carlo simulations. The obtained results show that the AC signal, for modulation frequencies < 200 MHz, has a depth sensitivity with similar characteristics to that of the continuous-wave (CW) domain (source modulation frequency of zero). Thus, the depth probed by such a signal can be estimated by using the formula of penetration depth for the CW domain (Sci. Rep.6, 27057 (2016)). However, the PH signal has a different behavior compared to the CW domain, showing a larger depth sensitivity at shallow depths and a less steep relative contrast as a function of depth. These results mark a clear difference in term of depth sensitivity between AC and PH signals, and highlight the complexity of the estimation of the actual depth probed in tissue spectroscopy.

Citing Articles

Fundamental effects of array density and modulation frequency on image quality of diffuse optical tomography.

Fan W, Trobaugh J, Zhang C, Yang D, Culver J, Eggebrecht A Med Phys. 2024; 52(2):1045-1057.

PMID: 39494917 PMC: 11788260. DOI: 10.1002/mp.17491.


Cross-wavelength calibrating method for real-time imaging of tissue optical properties using frequency-domain diffuse optical spectroscopy.

Pham T, Wei L, Roblyer D Biomed Opt Express. 2024; 15(8):4963-4979.

PMID: 39346994 PMC: 11427195. DOI: 10.1364/BOE.529551.


Spatial Sensitivity to Absorption Changes for Various Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Methods: A Compendium Review.

Blaney G, Sassaroli A, Fantini S J Innov Opt Health Sci. 2024; 17(4).

PMID: 39267952 PMC: 11391891. DOI: 10.1142/s1793545824300015.


Effects of atlas-based anatomy on modelled light transport in the neonatal head.

Hirvi P, Kuutela T, Fang Q, Hannukainen A, Hyvonen N, Nissila I Phys Med Biol. 2023; 68(13).

PMID: 37167982 PMC: 10460200. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/acd48c.


Real-Time Handheld Probe Tracking and Image Formation Using Digital Frequency-Domain Diffuse Optical Spectroscopy.

Applegate M, Amelard R, Gomez C, Roblyer D IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2021; 68(11):3399-3409.

PMID: 33835913 PMC: 8612633. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2021.3072036.


References
1.
Durduran T, Choe R, Baker W, Yodh A . Diffuse Optics for Tissue Monitoring and Tomography. Rep Prog Phys. 2015; 73(7). PMC: 4482362. DOI: 10.1088/0034-4885/73/7/076701. View

2.
Patterson M, Andersson-Engels S, Wilson B, Osei E . Absorption spectroscopy in tissue-simulating materials: a theoretical and experimental study of photon paths. Appl Opt. 2010; 34(1):22-30. DOI: 10.1364/AO.34.000022. View

3.
Boas D, OLeary M, Chance B, Yodh A . Detection and characterization of optical inhomogeneities with diffuse photon density waves: a signal-to-noise analysis. Appl Opt. 1997; 36(1):75-92. DOI: 10.1364/ao.36.000075. View

4.
Schmitt J, Knuttel A, Knutson J . Interference of diffusive light waves. J Opt Soc Am A. 1992; 9(10):1832-43. DOI: 10.1364/josaa.9.001832. View

5.
Contini D, Martelli F, Zaccanti G . Photon migration through a turbid slab described by a model based on diffusion approximation. I. Theory. Appl Opt. 1997; 36(19):4587-99. DOI: 10.1364/ao.36.004587. View