» Articles » PMID: 28662232

Nivolumab for Patients With Advanced Melanoma Treated Beyond Progression: Analysis of 2 Phase 3 Clinical Trials

Abstract

Importance: Immune checkpoint inhibitors have demonstrated atypical response patterns, which may not be fully captured by conventional response criteria. There is a need to better understand the potential benefit of continued immune checkpoint inhibition beyond progression.

Objective: To evaluate the safety and potential benefit of nivolumab (anti-programmed cell death receptor 1) monotherapy beyond Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1-defined progression.

Design, Setting, And Participants: Pooled, retrospective analysis of data from phase 3 trials of nivolumab in treatment-naive patients with advanced melanoma (CheckMate 066 or CheckMate 067) conducted at academic and clinical cancer centers. Participants were patients treated beyond first disease progression, defined as those who received their last dose of nivolumab more than 6 weeks after progression (TBP group); and patients not treated beyond progression, who discontinued nivolumab therapy before or at progression (non-TBP group). Data analyses were conducted from November 6, 2015, to January 11, 2017.

Interventions: Nivolumab (3 mg/kg every 2 weeks) administered until progression or unacceptable toxic effects. Patients could be treated beyond progression if deriving apparent clinical benefit and tolerating study drug, at the investigator's discretion.

Main Outcomes And Measures: Tumor response and safety in TBP and non-TBP patients.

Results: Among 526 randomized patients (39% [n = 203] female; median age, 62 years [range, 18-90 years]), 306 (58%) experienced disease progression, including 85 (28%) TBP patients and 221 (72%) non-TBP patients. Twenty-four (28%) of the TBP patients had a target lesion reduction of greater than 30% after progression compared with baseline (TBP>30% group). At the time of this analysis, 65 (76%) TBP patients and 21 (87%) TBP>30% patients were still alive; 27 (32%) and 11 (46%), respectively, continued to receive treatment. Median (range) time from progression to last dose of treatment was 4.7 (1.4-25.8) months for TBP patients and 7.6 (2.4-19.4) months for TBP>30% patients. Median (range) time from progression to greater than 30% tumor reduction was 1.4 (0.2-7.0) months. Treatment-related select grade 3 to 4 adverse events were similar in the TBP and non-TBP groups (5 [6%] and 9 [4%], respectively).

Conclusions And Relevance: A substantial proportion of selected patients treated with frontline nivolumab who were clinically stable and judged to be eligible for treatment beyond RECIST v1.1-defined progression by the treating investigators derived apparent clinical benefit without compromising safety. Further analysis will help define the potential benefit of continued nivolumab treatment beyond progression.

Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifiers: NCT01721772 (CheckMate 066) and NCT01844505 (CheckMate 067).

Citing Articles

Radiotherapy combined with locoregional hyperthermia for oligoprogression in metastatic melanoma local control.

Borkowska A, Chmiel P, Rutkowski P, Telejko M, Spalek M Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2025; 17:17588359251316189.

PMID: 39943943 PMC: 11815812. DOI: 10.1177/17588359251316189.


Phase II trial of nab-paclitaxel plus ramucirumab in combination with nivolumab for unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer after progression on first-line treatment including fluoropyrimidine, platinum, and anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody....

Hirano H, Takahashi N, Amanuma Y, Suzuki N, Takahari D, Kawakami T BMC Cancer. 2025; 25(1):201.

PMID: 39905373 PMC: 11795988. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-025-13591-5.


Beyond first-line therapy: efficacy and safety outcomes of continuing immunotherapy in extensive stage small cell lung cancer after PD-L1 inhibitor progression.

Peng J, Zhai X, Liu X, Huang Z, Wang Y, Wu P Transl Oncol. 2024; 52:102249.

PMID: 39709719 PMC: 11832948. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2024.102249.


Immunotherapy beyond progression following first‑line chemotherapy plus immunotherapy in advanced non‑small cell lung cancer: A retrospective study.

Gu X, Hu Y, Mungur I, Gu F, Xiong Y, Cui J Oncol Lett. 2024; 29(2):90.

PMID: 39677413 PMC: 11638921. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2024.14836.


Real-life effectiveness on overall survival of continued immune checkpoint inhibition following progression in advanced melanoma: estimation from the Melbase cohort.

Macaire C, Lefevre W, Dalac S, Montaudie H, Legoupil D, Dereure O Melanoma Res. 2024; 35(1):50-59.

PMID: 39527777 PMC: 11670915. DOI: 10.1097/CMR.0000000000000973.


References
1.
Ishida Y, Agata Y, Shibahara K, Honjo T . Induced expression of PD-1, a novel member of the immunoglobulin gene superfamily, upon programmed cell death. EMBO J. 1992; 11(11):3887-95. PMC: 556898. DOI: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05481.x. View

2.
Topalian S, Hodi F, Brahmer J, Gettinger S, Smith D, Mcdermott D . Safety, activity, and immune correlates of anti-PD-1 antibody in cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012; 366(26):2443-54. PMC: 3544539. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1200690. View

3.
Callahan M, Flaherty C, Postow M . Checkpoint Blockade for the Treatment of Advanced Melanoma. Cancer Treat Res. 2015; 167:231-50. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-22539-5_9. View

4.
Wolchok J, Hoos A, ODay S, Weber J, Hamid O, Lebbe C . Guidelines for the evaluation of immune therapy activity in solid tumors: immune-related response criteria. Clin Cancer Res. 2009; 15(23):7412-20. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-1624. View

5.
Keir M, Liang S, Guleria I, Latchman Y, Qipo A, Albacker L . Tissue expression of PD-L1 mediates peripheral T cell tolerance. J Exp Med. 2006; 203(4):883-95. PMC: 2118286. DOI: 10.1084/jem.20051776. View