» Articles » PMID: 28662097

Reconstructive Endovascular Treatment of Vertebral Artery Dissecting Aneurysms with the Low-profile Visualized Intraluminal Support (LVIS) Device

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2017 Jun 30
PMID 28662097
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: The Low-profile Visualized Intraluminal Support (LVIS) device is a new generation of self-expanding braided stent recently introduced in China for stent assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysms. The aim of our study is to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of the LVIS device in reconstructive treatment of vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms (VADAs).

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the neurointerventional database of our institution from June 2014 to May 2016. Patients who underwent endovascular treatment of VADAs with LVIS stents were included in this study. Clinical presentation, aneurysmal characteristics, technical feasibility, procedural complications, and angiographic and clinical follow-up results were evaluated.

Results: 38 patients with VADAs who underwent treatment with LVIS stent were identified, including 3 ruptured VADAs. All VADAs were successfully treated with reconstructive techniques including the stent-assisted coiling (n = 34) and stenting only (n = 4). Post-procedural complications developed in 3 patients (7.9%) including two small brainstem infarctions and one delayed thromboembolic event. Complications resulted in one case of minor permanent morbidity (2.6%). There was no procedure-related mortality. The follow-up angiogram was available in 30 patients at an average of 8.3 months (range, 2 to 30 months), which revealed complete occlusion in 23 patients (76.7%), residual neck in five patients (16.7%), and residual sac in two patients (6.7%). The follow-up of 25 aneurysms with incomplete immediate occlusion revealed 22 aneurysms (88%) with improvement in the Raymond class. One aneurysm (3.3%) showed recanalization and required retreatment. Clinical followed-up at 5-28 months (mean 14.1 months) was achieved in 36 patients because two patients died of pancreatic cancer and basal ganglia hemorrhage, respectively. No new neurologic deterioration or aneurysm (re)bleeding was observed.

Conclusions: Our preliminary experience with reconstruction of VADAs with the LVIS device demonstrates that this treatment approach is feasible with good short-term angiographic and clinical outcomes. Long-term and larger cohort studies are necessary to determine long-term outcomes of this therapy.

Citing Articles

A clinical comparative study of dual LVIS devices and single flow diversion stenting for the treatment of unruptured V3-V4 vertebral artery dissection.

Long S, Shi S, Zhang Z, Tian Q, Wei Z, Ma J Interv Neuroradiol. 2024; :15910199241254864.

PMID: 38751187 PMC: 11569745. DOI: 10.1177/15910199241254864.


Multiple Myeloma Treatment Challenges: A Case Report of Vertebral Artery Pseudoaneurysm Complicating Occipitocervical Arthrodesis and a Review of the Literature.

Reyes Soto G, Torres C, Perez Terrazas J, Honda Partida K, Rosario Rosario A, Campero A Cureus. 2024; 15(11):e49716.

PMID: 38161862 PMC: 10757504. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.49716.


Clinical and Angiographic Outcomes of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Intracranial Vertebral Artery Dissecting Aneurysms Using Double-Overlapping Stents : Low-Profile Visualized Intraluminal Support within Enterprise Stents.

Koo J, Hwang E, Song J, Lim Y J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2023; 67(5):531-540.

PMID: 38130141 PMC: 11375064. DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2023.0224.


Low-profile visualized intraluminal support-within-Enterprise overlapping-stent technique versus flow diversion in the treatment of intracranial vertebrobasilar trunk dissecting aneurysms.

Wu Q, Wang C, Xu S, Ji Z, Qi J, Li Y Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023; 13(6):3536-3546.

PMID: 37284083 PMC: 10239987. DOI: 10.21037/qims-22-970.


Endovascular Management of Iatrogenic Vertebral Artery Pseudoaneurysm: A Case Report.

Park J, Kim S, Kang M J Korean Soc Radiol. 2023; 84(2):483-488.

PMID: 37051392 PMC: 10083639. DOI: 10.3348/jksr.2022.0107.


References
1.
de Barros Faria M, Castro R, Lundquist J, Scrivano E, Ceratto R, Ferrario A . The role of the pipeline embolization device for the treatment of dissecting intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011; 32(11):2192-5. PMC: 7964407. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2671. View

2.
Guan J, Li G, Kong X, He C, Long J, Qin H . Endovascular treatment for ruptured and unruptured vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms: a meta-analysis. J Neurointerv Surg. 2016; 9(6):558-563. DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012309. View

3.
Levitt M, Park M, Albuquerque F, Moon K, Kalani M, McDougall C . Posterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery Patency after Flow-Diverting Stent Treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015; 37(3):487-9. PMC: 7960112. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4550. View

4.
Roy D, Milot G, Raymond J . Endovascular treatment of unruptured aneurysms. Stroke. 2001; 32(9):1998-2004. DOI: 10.1161/hs0901.095600. View

5.
Sonmez O, Brinjikji W, Murad M, Lanzino G . Deconstructive and Reconstructive Techniques in Treatment of Vertebrobasilar Dissecting Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015; 36(7):1293-8. PMC: 7965277. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4360. View